Differences Between Jefferson And Hamilton

Improved Essays
Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton had to different views on how America should function. In fact Jefferson never planned to work with Hamilton until Washington appointed Jefferson his first secretary of the State and Hamilton the first secretary of the Treasury. Jefferson strongly believed that America can achieve success through its agrarian tradition. Hamilton had an economic plan that involved that promotion of manufactures and commerce. While Hamilton believed in the federal government holding power and order Jefferson was a strong believer in trusting the people as governors. During the election of 1800 Jefferson called the election a revolution, Jefferson played an important role in shaping the way America functions. Alexander Hamilton served …show more content…
Hamilton believed that American manufacturers and businesses would help the nation flourish, also through higher prices and taxes. Jefferson believed that agriculture and trade would help bring the nation’s economy flourish. When it comes down to minorities Hamilton was not a fan because they were mostly farmers. However, Jefferson believes that they deserve equal rights and laws that everyone else has. Jefferson needed the minority vote during his presidential campaign because without them his economic plan for agriculture would be in jeopardy. Hamilton was in favor of keeping a techniques and views that are similar to the political views as Britain. Jefferson wanted to stay away from following Britain and copying Britain’s economic strategy. Military affairs was very important to Hamilton since he believed in having a strong and powerful government that takes pride in their military. However, Jefferson believed in being neutral and straying away from any violence unless there was a dire need. Jefferson’s idea of a trade system that would be centered on France. Hamilton wanted to keep America’s trade opportunities with

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Which ultimately led to the formation of America’s first political parties. Alexander Hamilton strongly accepted the need for a powerful central government. Hamilton was an officer in the American army during the American Revolution, which he had seen first-hand the creation of a forceless central authority.…

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jefferson was a strong believer in strict construction, which was abiding to what the Constitution specifically states, and not stretching its boundaries. This belief would affect the choices he made for this country. Hamilton believed in loose construction, which is the complete opposite of Jefferson’s idea, and was also pro-British, where Jefferson was pro-French. These disagreements would cause these two men to clash, causing Jefferson to step down since Washington was more influenced…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Jefferson had a very different idea for the future of America when compared to the views and ideas of A Slave and James Forten. Thomas Jefferson seemed to be very two-sided when deciding America’s future. Although he did not mention slavery with his Indian Policy, Jefferson and many other leaders were unsure of how to deal with african americans and indians. His Indian Policy was different depending on who he was talking to. This is shown through his letters to the governor of the Indiana Territory and to the Mandan Nation.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    England and France went back into war during 1793. However, both Hamilton and Jefferson wanted America to remain neutral; the only problem was that both individuals held their own biases towards the situation. On one end of the spectrum, Jefferson held a soft spot for the french after serving in France as an ambassador during the American Revolution and because he didn’t want to announce America’s neutrality, he wanted to keep the British guessing what America’s next move would be as a source of leverage. Hamilton on the other hand, felt that they should be upfront about their neutrality because he not only looked up to, but also appreciated the British and if their neutrality wasn’t clear, the British would automatically assume that America would sign with the French, therefore, they would have to protect Canada. Trying to prove that our neutrality was nothing but a weakness, the British proposed that they were going to violate the Treaty of Paris, as well as implement the Council of Orders.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    (112)American History Questions: 1a. The Articles of Confederation were concerned with the issue of state representation, land claims for states, and the role of a federal government. During the revolution, the states were still sovereign, which created massive conflict between states with greater financial and economic power and those with lesser power. More so, the debates over the role of a greater union between the states was important perceived threat to larger states, such as New York, that did not want a federal government regulating state sovereignty. In this manner, the Articles of Confederation reigned in state territorial claims and it solidified some aspects of a “confederation” that set the stages for a federal government after the Revolutionary War (Berkin et al. 153).…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brandy L. Shimp John P. Davis, Ph.D. HIS 108 29 November 2016 Jeffersonian versus Jacksonian Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson both had a similar vision on how to make America great but how they went about to achieve their vision was different in many aspects. Jefferson did not trust a centralized government; he wanted states to govern themselves while the Federal dealt with foreign affairs. He believed that the nation should remain rural with agriculture being the primary source of revenue. By supporting the expansion westward Jefferson knew it would allow for more small farmers to own land. Although, Jefferson supported the small farmers, he learned to accept the Bank of the United States by allowing it to continue.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1.I feel that Alexander Hamilton had the more sustainable vision for the United States. This is because his Federalist ideals were more practical for American in the long term. Specifically, his ideas. He understood that in order for the US to be able to deal with huge debts they would need financial backing. This is seen when he creates his financial plan and asks Congress to charter the Bank of the United States.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For whatever reason, the two men detested each other personally, a scorn that went far beyond the political disagreements that Hamilton and Jefferson had. And so when Hamilton saw that Burr had a chance of becoming President, he jumped in to stop it from happening. Choosing to argue for the election of one political rival over another, Hamilton…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Jefferson was elected to be president in 1801. Jefferson was built to be a political leader. At the age of 26 he sat in the chair of burgesses for six years, he was the governor of Virginia for three years and he also served as secretary of state for three years. Thomas Jefferson’s election as President was “The Revolution of 1800” because he cut back on spending, believed in states rights, and he wanted a small government which many would feel otherwise. Compared to George Washington and John Adams, Thomas Jefferson represented a real revolution.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In American history, few ideological disagreements have been as important as the divide between Alexander Hamilton 's Federalist Party and Thomas Jefferson 's Democrat-Republicans. Both parties were led by brilliant men whose political arguments would lay the foundation for debates on the nature of government in America that are ever present in our national discourse. Hamilton thought America should drive ahead into the future as an industrial and mercantile powerhouse, whereas Thomas Jefferson felt that America 's greatness lied in the "yeoman farmer" and the agrarian traditions he represented. Both sought the best path forward for the young American nation and both would have a chance to put their theories to the test in their capacities as ministers in the Washington Administration…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were two men who wanted change in the political party system. This is where the two new political parties were created, the Federalist party and the Democratic-Republicans. These two new forms of government brought new and different ideas on how to run a federal government. Most candidates of today still follow these ways of thinking, but their ideals are much less extreme, but also these ideas could be applied to some of the problems of today. Alexander Hamilton started his political career as an advisor to Washington during his presidency.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It gave them a chance to start a new form of government without a king. The only problem was Hamilton and Jefferson did not have the same idea of the type of government they wanted to accomplish for their new nation. Hamilton wanted to accomplish a strong central government. He wanted a government that would be able to control the people’s behavior. He understood that “sometimes good people do bad things and bad people do good things”, this gave Hamilton an advantage because Jefferson did not recognize this.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    While trying to maintain a level-headed approach towards the “Farmer’s” accusations, Hamilton almost entirely disagrees with him and his ideas. He does a good job explaining the facts that the readers need to know with regards to the democratic status of the colonies with the existence of the Continental Congress as opposed to if it had not been there. Hamilton completely supports the decisions that the Continental Congress has made on non-importation and non-exportation. That is, as far as he is concerned, the only way possible to get through to the British is by taking something really dear from them away. He further assesses the geopolitical status of the British and concludes that they simply do not possess the resources to stage a full-out war on the colonies.…

    • 1861 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the late 18th and early 19th century, Jefferson and Hamilton explicitly exemplify their views about the agricultural and industrial economy. During the Revolutionary war, Americans boycotted manufactured goods that the British made which then lead to the Intolerable Acts in…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He was an anti-federalist and in order to reduce the influence of the central government, Jefferson decreased the amount of government employees, lowered Army enlistments, and cut the national debt. During his presidency, Jefferson was faced with foreign affairs every day. It often pushed him towards Federalists policies that negates his personal political philosophy. Jefferson’s is very well spoken and that is one of the reasons he was able to purchase the Louisiana Purchase for $15 million. Jefferson’s ideal agrarian democracy ignores the fact that slaves are the ones to work on the richest farmlands in the Unites States.…

    • 2099 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays