It explains the reasons for people to have their arguments on if something is right or wrong based on facts and explanations rather than just personal beliefs. In watchmen, Moral Objectivism plays a big role in helping readers decide for themselves if what Ozymandias did was both right and wrong because of the individual aspects surrounding the situation. As previously stated before, the readers decide amongst themselves whether the pros outweigh the cons by using the information provided. Sure, it’s terribly gruesome to murder millions of innocent lives. But in the end, is it worth saving billions? This information provided allows the readers to think for themselves and come up with their answer, allowing a more mature and well-enforced argument. Those that support Moral Relativism would make their arguments on Ozymandias’ decision based on what they thought was acceptable in their culture which could be correct, but also at the same time be incorrect. It is always better, in an argument, to use evidence and facts, rather than what you believe is to be true. This makes Moral Objectivism the best of the two in the Moral
It explains the reasons for people to have their arguments on if something is right or wrong based on facts and explanations rather than just personal beliefs. In watchmen, Moral Objectivism plays a big role in helping readers decide for themselves if what Ozymandias did was both right and wrong because of the individual aspects surrounding the situation. As previously stated before, the readers decide amongst themselves whether the pros outweigh the cons by using the information provided. Sure, it’s terribly gruesome to murder millions of innocent lives. But in the end, is it worth saving billions? This information provided allows the readers to think for themselves and come up with their answer, allowing a more mature and well-enforced argument. Those that support Moral Relativism would make their arguments on Ozymandias’ decision based on what they thought was acceptable in their culture which could be correct, but also at the same time be incorrect. It is always better, in an argument, to use evidence and facts, rather than what you believe is to be true. This makes Moral Objectivism the best of the two in the Moral