Mandatory Sentencing Strategies

Improved Essays
There are thousands of nonviolent drug offenders serving a lengthy mandatory prison sentencing within federal prisons. Years ago, during the “war on drugs”, this was President Richard Nixon quick fix to the dramatic growth on drug use and dealing. Decades later, maybe sooner, it has come to light that this mandatory sentencing mostly affected African American Men. For example, powder cocaine versus crack cocaine, were said to be two different drugs and crack cocaine dealers would serve a mandatory sentencing if in possession of such. Crack cocaine was an easy drug to acquire in urban neighbourhoods while powder cocaine was seen as a much prestige drug used among a more rich community. President Barack Obama has shown to be determined to find …show more content…
President Obama has mastered ways to use his limited constitutional and congressional powers. His efforts to pass the Criminal Justice Reform Bill, as his last bill before the end of his term, has shown to be promising. The Criminal Justice Reform Bill is a legislation to reduce some of the mandatory sentencing. President Obama has used both Samuel Kernall and Richard Neustadt theoretical strategies power of persuasion by the president. Samuel Kernall strategy of “going public” at which the president takes his political issues, that the government refuse to agree with, and publicise it to get mass support from the public. Richard Neustadt power to persuade is a strategy where the president is more formal by inform individuals that it is in their best interest to support his political issues at hand. Both theories have become strategies used by some of the most successful presidents in the past. President Obama has shown that both strategies are successful strategies with gaining support for the Criminal Justice Reform …show more content…
This strong armed power strategy is not easily seen by the public. With the need for a replacement Supreme Court judge, to fill an open seat, has gotten republicans on their toes with the presidential election coming to an end and a congress that could shift to one political party side with the implant of one candidate. president Obama looking to have his Criminal Justice Bill pass before the end of his term could use a quick solution. Informing the republicans of the outcome of nominating a democratic to fill the Supreme Court possession could be dramatic would be seen as a strong arm threat to the republicans. A president whose political party holds more seated in both chambers of congress is seen to not have much resistance in passing further legislation. Doing so this would be President Obama 's way of persuading the republicans with his position to fill the seat, to support his bill or lose the majority in

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Summary: The New Jim Crow

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This book chapter was written by Michelle Alexander, a successful civil rights litigator and advocate for racial justice. In this chapter Alexander talks about the War on Drugs, racial discrimination, the stigmatization of African American men, housing discrimination, poverty, the rights that felons lose after incarceration, the difficulties of reintegration to society, recidivism, and Supreme Court cases. During the war on drugs, law enforcement was encouraged to go after crack cocaine instead of powder cocaine. At that time, it was well known that crack cocaine was commonly used…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the most recent couple of years the verbal confrontation about whether obligatory sentencing ought to be nullified, and judges utilizing their own carefulness ought to happen has turned into a well known dialog in the United States. I see upsides and downsides for both sides. Mandatory least have filled the correctional facilites and penitentiaries with an excess of peaceful, first time guilty parties which brings about prison/jail packing and more obligation. President Obama expressed in a discourse "We have to lower long obligatory least sentences or dispose of them totally. " Opponents of compulsory least sentences contend that: Minority litigants are excessively detained contrasted with Caucasian respondents under the compulsory least…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    When the elected branches have decided on a course of action-even on controversial issues-they usually prevail. However, the absence of enforcement authority has allowed Congress and the president at times to ignore Supreme Court rulings. Presidents realize that Congress is more willing to relax control when it knows it can easily reassert its preferences if it disagrees with the bureaucracy’s implementation of a policy. By continuing to honor these statutory provisions, designed to create more flexible principal-agency relations, the elected branches have colluded informally to “overrule” the Supreme Court’s verdict on the unconstitutionality of the legislative veto. Several provisions of the Constitution equip Congress and the president with the power to rein in the Supreme Court when they disagree with its decisions.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nixon Drug Cartels Essay

    • 1373 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As we stated before about five percent of the World population and 25 percent of world prisoners are citizens of the U.S. Only one quarter of the U.S. population are African American and Hispanics. Anybody would think that our justice system would serve right, but in reality it does not. Although white people are five times more likely to use drugs, an estimate of 58 percent of all prisoners are African American and Hispanic and African Americans face jail time at nearly six times the rate of whites. In fact Hispanics are almost four times as likely to go to prison at some point, but less likely than African Americans are sent to prison for drug offenses at ten times the rate as whites. Research shows that African Americans represent 12 percent of the total population of drug users, but 38 percent of those arrested for drug offenses, and 59 percent of those in state prison for a drug offense.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States Congress has granted the Sentencing Commission to conduct research and collect data collection. There instructions were to “develop means of measuring the degree to which the sentencing, penal, and correctional practices are effective in meeting the purposes of sentencing” (Barkow, 2013). Guidelines are limited because the only govern judges and parole officials but lack the appropriate regulations to govern prosecutorial discretion. Congress have been known to ignore findings provided by the Commission. Their recommendations fell on death’s ears when it came to the Commission proposing to eliminated the disparity between sentences for usage powdered and crack cocaine in in the mid 90’s.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Crack vs Powder Cocaine: Unjust Prison Sentences of Two Races For decades the United States has experienced an imbalance sentencing problem between African Americans and White Americans who use crack cocaine and powder cocaine respectively. Although both of these drugs are similar to one another, African Americans have been incarcerated more often than White Americans. According to the NAACP, from 1980 to 2008, the number of prisoners in America increased from about 500,000 to 2.3 million. Today, the US makes up about 5% of the world population and has almost 25% of the world prisoners (NAACP). Out of the 2.3 million prisoners who are in U.S. prisons, nearly 1 million of those locked up are African Americans (NAACP).…

    • 1920 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States’ governmental policies known as the War on Drugs contributed to increases of incarceration and arrest rates, notably of African Americans; although substance use and abuse rates of African Americans are lower than that of Whites. Kakade, Duarte, Liu, Fuller, Drucker, Hoven, Fan, and Wu (2012) addressed two main hypotheses: the “differential offending” hypothesis and the “differential treatment” hypothesis. Kakade et. al hypothesized for the “differential offending” hypothesis that overrepresentation of racial/ethnic minorities in the juvenile and criminal justice systems reveals racial differences in the prevalence, the seriousness and the consistent engagement in criminal behavior. Kakade et.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Smarter Sentencing

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Pages

    I am writing this letter requesting you vote in favor of the Smarter Sentencing Act. Sentences regarding possession and trafficking of controlled substances are due for much needed review. Taxpayers spend several thousand dollars to hold a single inmate in prison for a year, and there are thousands of individuals currently incarcerated for such offenses. By essentially halving the minimum sentence of these crimes the billions of taxpayer dollars saved can be applied elsewhere.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the many ways that our criminal justice system demonstrably targets minority groups can be seen in the way we prosecute cocaine drug offenders. The Anti-Drug Abuse Act was passed by Congress in 1986, in response to the increased usage of cocaine around the nation. However, this act mandated criminal penalties for the possession of crack cocaine that were much more severe than that of powder cocaine. The possession of 500 grams of powder cocaine yields a five-year mandatory minimum sentence for a first offense; yet it takes merely 28 grams of crack cocaine to prompt the same sentence (Riley). This is notable because when this act was established, African Americans were more likely to possess crack cocaine, whereas powder cocaine offenders were more commonly white (Riley).…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mandatory Minimum Sentences

    • 2345 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Introduction On March 12 2012, Harpers conservative government implemented omnibus bill that introduced many new mandatory minimum sentences (cbc,2012). As part of Harpers tough on crime agenda, the bill introduced mandatory minimum sentences for crimes such as drug trafficking, child exploitation and some other violent offences(cbc,2012).In accordance to their tough on crime agenda, the harper government has introduced so many new mandatory minimums sentence, to the point that we now have the second most mandatory minimum sentences in the world, second to the USA(Fine,2015). Since their introduction these mandatory minimum sentences have been debated heavily, with most people believing these mandatory minimum are unnecessary and are just increasing…

    • 2345 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While watching Law and Order or NCIS, it is common to hear about the policy known as the Mandatory Minimal Sentencing. When someone goes to court they are told how long they need to serve for their crime, the lowest and highest. The lowest is set by the Mandatory Minimal Sentencing policy. The policy impacted prisons across the country. There has been an enormous rise in the prison population, along with the guidelines causing discrimination with in the justice system.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prison Rehabilitation DBQ

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Though blacks make up only 13% of the U.S. population, 40% of the prison population are black (Source E). This racial disparity is a systemized result from laws passed by the government. Mass incarceration began with the implementation of “law and order,” the government announcing a war on drugs. However, a racial disparity became evident as possession of crack cocaine held a more severe sentence that of pure cocaine (Source B). This differentiation effectively criminalized more African Americans since crack cocaine was more prominent in their communities due to its low price.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Proceduralism In America

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are cases and situations, specifically that have to do with the executive agreements and executive orders, usually when Congress is silent it can mean consent. Further, Lessig and Sunstien, believe that the president should be given its powers provided by the constitution in article 2, as well as, the virtues that it was been promised as the one who tries to execute all laws. This really speaks on the structure and how the president should be given the opportunity to see what he started go through the appropriate process. The separation of powers has become blurred in that this is an issue that interconnects all the branches. If the senate tried to impeach the president due to him appointing Garland, Glarland would ironically hear Obama’s impeachment trial.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I personally feel tougher sentences do not necessarily mean deterrence, especially with drug offenders. I also feel habitual offenders that are serving life sentences for non-violent crimes never received the correct treatment for them to stop repeat offending. This has led to the overcrowding of our prisons and cutbacks to resources which makes it even harder for inmates to receive any kind of treatment they may need. We live in a county that leads the world in sentencing offenders to prison yet our crime rates haven't changed("Criminal Justice," 2017). A study conducted in 2009 by the top criminologists in the United States discovered 88% of their peers believed the death penalty which is the harshest sentence one can be given, did not…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Understanding the relationship between the president and congress is key in understanding American politics. Congress and the president cannot avoid engaging with one another, with a constitutional set up that demands they work together constructively. Congress has its roles to play in policy making as does the president. The president and congress are given certain powers in the constitution, that power is divvied up, so that neither one of these branches has too much power at one time (Fisher 2007). The founders of the constitution were very distrustful of the presidency and feared if the president was given too much power it would lead to demagogy (Dickinson 2008).…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays