Plea Bargaining In Criminal Justice Essay

Superior Essays
C 7 – Final

1. The plea bargaining process in the current criminal justice system

The plea bargaining process supports the criminal justice system by helping the judges manage their caseloads in a quicker manner. In courtroom 302, the National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards said, that “The focus was not on rehabilitation or even deterrence, but merely on the disposal of cases, the quicker, the better” (Bogira, 2005, p. 41). Also, we learned in class that the criminal system will collapse if everybody chooses to go to trial instead of opting for the plea bargain.” (Dalton, class lecture, February 9, 2016).
The plea bargaining process undermines the criminal system by coercing innocent defenders to admit guilt to crimes they did not commit. In the Introduction to Criminal justice, Douglas Guidorizzi, one of the plea bargain critics, claims that “plea bargaining undermines the integrity of the criminal system by subverting many of its values; that it allows criminals to “get away” with lenient sentences, thereby undermining the deterrent effect of criminal sanctions; and that it results in the possible coercion of innocent defendants to plead guilty” (Kurbin & Stucky,
…show more content…
(Dalton, class lecture, March 01, 2016). These crimes of public order can seem to be unimportant or harmless, but they can cause someone to have a lot of troubles with the law. For example, as we discussed in class concerning the Henry Gates case. Henry Gates did not commit any crimes but by losing his temper and raising his voice and arguing with the police officers caused him to get arrested for disorderly conduct. The Henry Gates arrest case had received extensive media coverage since he was a well-known and respected African-American university professor with high socioeconomic status. Henry Gates also has strong connections and has close personal relations with President

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Review: In 1975, Attorney General, Avrum Gross, declared a prohibition on plea-bargaining in Alaska. Michael Rubinstein and Teresa J. White from National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice were assigned to study the impact of Gross’s decision. Their first task was looking at whether the policy had been carried out by the courts in Alaska, and second, was what the effects were on Alaska’s criminal justice system. This involved conducting 400 interviews of the surrounding judges in Alaska and collecting information from 3,586 case files. Overall their goal was to create a detailed description of the Alaska system during the “before and after” years.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea-bargaining is an important process in the criminal justice system and are used to prevent lengthy trials. It is defined as “the process of negotiating a guilty plea involving either charge bargaining, where the prosecutor will offer to reduce the severity of the charges or the number of counts in exchange for a guilty plea, or sentence bargaining, where the prosecutor will agree to recommend leniency at the sentencing stage” (Hemmens, Brody, & Spohn, 2013). However, there are both pros and cons with plea-bargaining. One reason why plea-bargaining is an advantage to the court system is because it helps to relieve caseloads since the prosecutor’s workload decreases when a defendant takes the bargain. Also, when a defendant goes this route,…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The individuals falsely accused in the article may have been victims of the Assembly-Line Justice Court Model. It is discussed that this type of court is unfair with little concern for efficiency or processes. This model also suggests that plea bargains are frequent because parties wish to make a quick decision. Milton Lantigua was offered a plea bargain but denied it because of his innocence. He was then sentenced to 20 years in prison for a crime he did not commit.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R Vs Nixon Essay

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    After considering both sides of the argument, the author of this paper agrees with the Supreme Court of Canada and their decision to allow prosecutorial reneging of plea bargains. This opinion is based on the goal of the proper administration of justice and the fact that justice Charron made clear in the case that reputations should remain rare (R v. Nixon, para 69). Therefore, there is not the fear that plea bargains can be revoked on a…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the Innocence Project Organization more than 20,000 innocent people are currently serving time in prison. The Billy Glaze and Andre Hatchett cases are two of thousands in which one can lead one to see the faults in the United States court system. By analyzing the case details, what happened during the investigation, and what stood out during the trial and investigation of both cases, one can conclude that our criminal justice system truly is flawed. Billy Glaze is a man who even lost his life in prison. Andre Hatchett was able to be freed but not until he already served 25 years in prison.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Autonomy In DA

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Pages

    When dealing with autonomy is generally centered base on management of prosecutorial, this enables the assistant district attorney to have the freedom to make his or her own decisions. In some DA’s office there typically written policies regarding cases. Attempting to control the supervision of the assistants tend to erode the morale of the office ( Neubauer, D. W., & Fradella, H. F. 2014). However, this can help reduce a lot of mistakes from the assistant by reviewing all cases to ensure that policies are been followed this only makes the DA assistant more uncomfortable because they feel that they’re trusted.…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea bargaining most often takes place before the beginning of a trial. It is the process by which the defendant and the prosecution work out a conclusion to the case, subject to court approval. For the prosecutor, the purpose of plea bargaining is to ensure a defendant gets punishment. For the defense, it is a way to get a lesser charge than if the case were to go to…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plea Bargain Advantages

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Thus, it is imperative that all actors in the criminal justice and court systems use plea bargain correctly every time. Plea Bargains have changed the appearance of the criminal justice and court system over time. Having a fluid process for plea bargains has become vital in the criminal justice system. The use of a plea bargain will impact…

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea Bargaining Process

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages

    You succinctly described how the Plea and Plea Bargaining phase is an important but controversial part of the Juvenile Court Process. As you noted through your law enforcement experience, many see plea bargaining as a miscarriage of justice. While it does bring an otherwise weak case to some type of closure therefore ultimately saving the time of the court and money for the tax papers, it does not truly bring justice for the victim(s) or the community. “Counterarguments hold that plea bargaining with juveniles is an unregulated and unethical process” (Siegel & Welsh, 2014, p. 360). This is one of the many gray areas that the juvenile court system has as apposed to the adult system.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 10 of Examining Wrongful Convictions: Stepping Back, Moving Forward our authors Take a look into our plea-bargaining systems role into wrongful convictions. According to our authors plea- bargaining dispose of roughly 95 % of adjudicated criminal cases (Maguire, Tbls. 5.24.2008, 5.46.2006). Over my years of taking criminal justice course I have learned to so many innocent people actually plead guilty to crimes they did not commit. DNA evidence which lead to an exoneration is evidence of just that. Wrongful convictions produce out of our Plea Bargaining are much less likely to result in an exoneration due to the defendants own admittance.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nils Christie wrote “Conflicts as Property” arguing the importance of conflicts in society and how they have become property that can be used and stolen. In this critical summary I will summarize and then critically analyze his work to determine if I agree with his argument. Christie opens the paper by arguing the importance of conflicts in our society and that “they ought to be used, and become useful, for those originally involved in the conflict.” He continues by describing how conflicts are taken from the victim, who “is so thoroughly represented that she or he of most of the proceedings is pushed completely out of the arena, reduced to the triggerer-off of the whole thing.” The author also denounces courts and lawyers that, he believes, are trained to steal, prevent, and solve conflicts.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Around 95 percent of cases are plea bargained. Without plea bargaining, the court system would be drowning in cases and the right to a speedy trial under the 6th amendment would be virtually impossible. The court system in the United States is already overloaded with cases waiting to be heard, and the added cases resulting in the elimination of plea bargaining would be catastrophic for the criminal justice system. What plea bargaining does is allow the prosecutor to offer a lesser charge and, in turn, the defendant waives their right to a trial. It allows the court system to move along faster and deal with the offenders who commit more serious, heinous crimes.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Evidence Interpretation

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages

    With lacking evidence, detectives and prosecutors choose the most likely suspect, however; this is not always liable as from time to time, the individual in question is not guilty. There have been cases over the years where innocent defendants are coerced into confession during questioning; confession evidence can be quite compelling in front of the judge and jury (Braithwaite, 2012). Furthermore, individuals who are innocent and being prosecuted for a crime can be convinced that there is enough substantial evidence to prove their guilt, even when there is little to no substantial evidence in the case to start with. They are pushed to believe they would not make it through trial and receive an innocent verdict, often times causing blameless persons to accept a plea-bargain (Gilchrist, 2011). Unfortunately, there is substantial evidence proving that more guiltless individuals are imprisoned due to accepting a plea bargain than taking the case to trail and demanding their innocence (Gilchrist,…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every year in the United States approximately ten thousand individuals may be convicted of a serious crime that they did not commit (Spring 1). Therefore, allowing guilty parties who are a danger to society to remain on the streets resulting in a lack of trust from members in the public towards the judicial system; this source of an undermine towards the judicial system created by the viewpoints of the public on wrongful convictions may be considered as the foremost source of what leads to the main causes for wrongful convictions. The main causes for wrongful convictions in the criminal justice system are mistaken identification by an eye witness, ineffective assistance of the defense counsel, police or prosecutorial misconduct, and false…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The District Attorney has discretionary power to decide the disposition of cases. One of the primary ways that the District Attorney uses its’ discretion is in how he processes plea-bargaining. The District Attorney may reduce a defendants’ exposure to a crime if he provides some pieces of information that he needs to prosecute a bigger player in the narcotics trade. It has been said that the administration of justice is a selective process in which only those cases that will not overload the system will ultimately be prosecuted (Cole, 1970)…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays