Liquidated Damages Essay

Improved Essays
COMPENSATION FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT WHERE PENALTY IS STIPULATED FOR

Liquidated damages where the sentence is specified
Section 74 of the Act deals with the parties have agreed in the contract, the penalty for breach of contract itself provides that liquidated damages. The main principle behind this festival is to promote certainty in commercial contracts. Article 74 stipulates that compensation, the amount does not exceed the terms of the contract, it must take into account the victim default. It further provides that such damage must take into account, whether they prove any actual loss or damage to the injured party. Genuine pre-estimate of damages and punitive interpretation of Article 74 differentiate between. The penalty will be a sum of money, which is specified in order to discourage people from breach of contract. When one of the contractual obligations of
…show more content…
• Section 74 read with Section 73 and, therefore, in each case of default, and the aggrieved person to prove that he suffered before he can apply for a decree does not require a breach of contract, the actual loss or damage. Under the circumstances the Court has the ability, even without proof of actual loss suffered the consequences of breach of a violation of a reasonable award of compensation.
• In some contracts, it would be impossible to court, in order to assess the breach, if we consider the compensation will not be punished or unreasonable manner, the court may grant the same, if it is a genuine pre-estimate of the parties arising compensation As a reasonable compensation

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Collateral Estoppel Case

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rule 14-207(b), that GSMC and Ocwen lack standing to pursue foreclosure, and that the denial of her motions constitute a denial of procedural due process. These arguments rest on the premise that neither GSMC nor Ocwen has an enforceable interest in Sucklal’s note. It has been conclusively determined, however, that GSMC and Ocwen do have enforceable interests in the note. The judgment rendered in Sucklal’s declaratory judgment action satisfies the elements so as to invoke collateral estoppel with respect to the issue of Sucklal’s liability to GSMC and Ocwen on the instrument. Accordingly, Sucklal is estopped from arguing that GSMC and Ocwen have no interest in her note.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Circuit Court Case Study

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Notably, the trial court did not expressly ground its decision on the language of the Release contained in the parties settlement agreement. Rather, the court found that Kaye had not breached the relevant standard of care, that Wilson-Gaskins had failed to show that she suffered damages, and that any damages she did suffer were not caused by Kaye. Accordingly, the circuit court found that Wilson-Gaskins failed to make a prima facie showing of professional negligence or a breach of contract.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the laws about comparative negligence, you are able to seek damages from the other party in a car accident. Even if you were partially at fault, you are entitled to recover the percent of the damages that was not your fault. If you were 40 percent at fault for a $100,000 accident, you would be able to recover 60 percent, or $60,000, of the total amount. The “No-Fault” Laws in Florida…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our criminal system has numerous felony cases depending on the crime that are committed. Mississippi has a law that allows property to be seized, and possibly forfeited, if it is assumed to have connection with a violation of controlled substances laws. To validate a forfeiture,” the State must essentially prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that an item of property was “used” or “intended to be used” in violation of the law. Some items of property subject to forfeiture are intuitive – drugs, drug containers, paraphernalia and items used to manufacture drugs are all routinely forfeited”. Under Mississippi’s civil forfeiture laws the government has to connect property to a crime by a multitude of evidence in order to forfeit it.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glimer Case Study

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Glimer, there was some ambiguity about the effect of the statutory exclusion for contracts of employment because, the arbitration clause was not in a contract between an employee and an employer, but rather was in a contract between an employee and the agency. The Supreme Court clarified the ambiguity in Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams, where the Court interpreted the exemption for “contracts of employment” exceptionally narrowly. The Court held that the statute applied to all contracts of employment except those involving workers who, like seamen and railroad workers, were engaged in transportation that crossed state lines. . Therefore, it is now clear that the FAA allows enforcement of agreements mandating arbitration of employment…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Auto accident personal injury settlements offer the compensation amount for the injured victim in an auto accident when the claim is handled through insurance. The increasing rate in the amount of more motor vehicle accidents in the United States makes auto accident insurance settlements one of the most prolific types amongst the insurance settlements. Settlement offers you negotiation for personal injury claims. According to Bureau of Transportation statistics, at least five million motor vehicle accidents are recorded every year on the nation's roadways, two million people are injured, and at least 20,000 people die. Auto accident personal injury settlements are also possible in various injury and property damage auto accident situations.…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Small Claims Court Essay

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The article of the Small Claims Court was an article that dissected what television shows like Judge Judy does to the general public and beyond. This article focused on juries that were in Manhattan, the District of Columbia and Hackensack, New Jersey. However, it would have been interesting for the article to have polled other cities that were not in the northeast of the United States. I believe that if they would had used more different regions in the study, it could have been more complete and perhaps different, given that the study could have found more detailed, thorough findings. The reason it may be different in other regions in the United States is, since some other people may not have watched shows like Judge Judy or they…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Case Study

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Question 1 Area of the Tort law: Negligence Liability Material Facts: Benji v Parramatta Storms Rugby League Club, Jack and Bronco (Personal Injury- Head)/ Negligence act. Benji (Plaintiff), a first grade league player of Western Tigers Rugby League Football Club was severely injured following a spear tackle by Parramatta Storms Rugby League Club’s (first defendant) players Jack and Bronco (second and third defendants). Benji was therefore forced into career retirement at his peak due to negligent acts of the defendant. Subsequently, National Rugby League charged the second and third defendant with having made a dangerous throw, to which they pleaded guilty. Issues: The most pertinent issue at hand is the fact that whether the defendants…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Tort Duty

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “It is primarily the blameworthiness of parental non-action, however, that justifies recognition of a tort duty to protect minor children” (Johnson & Hargrove, p. 319). “For example, in Laser v. Wilson,28 the high court of Maryland found that the parents of a two year-old child, and not their hosts, who had invited the parents and their child to a family gathering, had the duty to protect the child from the obvious danger of an open stairwell. 29 In a Texas case, a trial court entered a tort verdict against a mother who had failed to protect her daughters from abuse by their father.30 In another passive-parent case, in Minnesota, "the mother of a 21-year-old woman who was molested by her father as a child [was] found jointly liable for part of a $2.4 million jury award against him" (Johnson & Hargrove, p.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Promissory Estoppel Essay

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This essay seeks to discuss the Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel and the Doctrine of Consideration, as well as a clear analysis, with the use of case law, how Promissory Estoppel has become an exception to the general principle that a promise may only be enforced if it is supported by good consideration; it will ultimately conclude whether or not a promise to accept a smaller sum in discharge of a larger sum, if acted upon, is binding notwithstanding the absence of consideration. A contract is a legally binding agreement in law between two or more parties, which is enforced by law or by binding arbitration if it covers the elements of a valid legal agreement. For there to be a valid contract, three elements must be present, offer, acceptance, and consideration. If there is no consideration, there is no contract; however, with promissory estoppel instead of consideration, if there is a promise which induces reliance, the court would find some sort of liability for the promise.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Plaintiffs Marc and Bree Kohel entered into a sales contract with the Defendant Bergen Auto Enterprise, LLC for the purchase of a used 2009 Mazda. The Plaintiffs alleged breach of contract was when the Defendant refused to supply permanent plates for the 2009 Mazda that the Plaintiffs already paid for. Also, for the Defendant refusing to pay off plaintiff’s outstanding loan on the Nissan, as they had agreed in the contract. The Defendant argued that the Plaintiffs delivery of the Nissan without a VIN tag was a breach of the contract of sale and excludes the finding that Defendant breach the contract. Rule of Law:…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    THIRD ISSUE: RESPONDENT has valid grounds for avoidance of the Sales Contract on 7 July 2014 and 9 July 2014 B.CLAIMANT did breach the Sales Contract on 4 July 2014 and 8 July 2014 I. CLAIMANT breached the Sales Contract for the inconsistency between the Sales Contract and the letter of Credit opened on 4 July 2014 1. The CISG applies to the merits of the case at issue Pursuant to Article 20 of the Sales Contract [Cl. Exh.1, p. 7], “The contract, including this clause, shall be governed by the law of Danubia”. As Danubia is a Contracting State to the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (hereinafter CISG) [R.A., p. 5, para.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Contracts are an integral part of society, having strong legal contractual principles gives confidence to consumers, investors and anyone who wishes to enter into a contract. Entering in a contract shows that in a primitive way that two parties are on the same page, however it is noted that a high proportion of litigation does actually stem from misunderstood contract (Duxbury (2011)).In this scenario Gary believes he has a valid contract with Mike and is disappointed to learn that Mike has sold on the Bike to Liz (third party). Using previous cases as precedent and analysing the conditions in which a contract is made, advice will be given to Gary on his legal position in regards to the contract and whether there is any suitable remedy that…

    • 1534 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Tort Law

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A tort is a civil wrong that are done by one party against another or causes someone else to suffer loss or harm resulting for the person who commits the act. Tort law decides whether a person should be held legally responsible for injury against another, and what type of compensation the injured party is entitled to. There are 4 elements to tort law which are duty, breach of duty, causation and injury.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James, Adjou, Sylvia, Bob and Tim (represented by Ian) require identifying and advice as to the applicability of relevant contract and tort/delict principles to the current scenario presented in the problem question. Before proceeding with advising the individual’s, we need to check the validity of the contract and to establish the note displayed on the car windscreen is “Invitation to Treat” (or) “Offer”. The difference between the two is significant and need to be specifically identify, as the ‘invitation to treat’ cannot be accepted legally and an offer is an expression of willingness to contract on the specified terms without further negotiation and which is legally accepted.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays