John Rawls Theory Of Justice Essay

Superior Essays
John Rawls was born in 1921, he was recognized as a huge leading proponent of liberalism, which is belief in the value of social and political change in order to achieve progress. (Johnson Encyclopedia). It is to believed that there are two important life events that shaped Rawls’s philosophical work. He lost two younger brothers, one to diphtheria and the other to pneumonia. He also serves as in soldier in the pacific during the last two years of World War II. “These experiences also most likely influenced the development of his vison of justice…” (Johnson Encyclopedia). Rawls used these important events in his life to shape his ideas and they help create the perspective he gives us in his writings. These two experiences helped developed the vision of justice Rawls had for those who were less fortunate than others. In 1971, Rawls published his first major piece of work “A Theory of Justice”. “…Arguing that choices of principle concerning the basic structure of society should …show more content…
The question is, is fairness the same a justice or do we have to decide whether fairness or justice is more important to have a better society? Rawls wants everything to be fair, but if it takes away money from those who make a higher income, then is it really justice? When I hear the word justice, I think of the law; it is something that is the same for everyone and does not change. It can be good in some ways, but can also be a very negative thing. Laws are made to make sure everyone follows the same rules, but there are some rules that are inevitably broken by some people, and it is unfair that they get in trouble because of that law. The problem with fairness is just because something is fair to one person may not seem fair to another. People tend to see what others have and want it instead of what they have even though they have their fair

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    An act that John Rawls would disagree with is the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act was passed 2001 and it allows the government to wire tape and surveillance people who are suspected of terrorist related activities linked to terrorist groups. John Rawls would find this act unjust, because it violates individuals right to privacy and allows the government is profile “suspected” individuals. This act also opens to the door to allow the government to abuse their power, by spying on citizens. I would partially agree with Rawls for finding this act unjust however I think the patriot act is in the best interest for everyone.…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rawls looks at what the proper role of government should be and he begins with the idea that there are primary goods, which include both material goods and goods of rights or opportunities. It is societies job to figure out how to help us cooperate to distribute those goods in a just way. Rawls does not claim that those goods must be distributed equally, unlike Marx, Rawls is advocating for a welfare state not a communist state. Rawls separates the distribution of material goods and rights, and determines that there are certain rights that must be…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues that a person's liberty is what is most important and should be a priority. The second principle is called the “Difference Principle” which requires social and economic inequalities to be modified so that they can produce an outcome that is fair and equal to all. Rawls’ notion of justice as fairness demands that distribution of the goods of society should be consciously structured in order to provide a fair distribution. His last argument ensures that no one is advantaged or disadvantaged in society, this is called the social contract theory. The “original position” is the main component on Rawls’ social contract account of justice, it allows us to figure out what principle of justice people in society would agree to if we lived in a society of total freedom.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If ancient Athenian society followed the conception of justice idolized by Rawls, would Socrates find himself in the predicament that he faced in Crito? The answer to that question, is absolutely not, because of how those principles are set. The first principle of Rawls states “Each person is to have an equal right . . . similar liberty for others.”…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mass incarceration also creates a social hierarchy with Blacks being at the bottom because of being labeled a drug addict/user and a criminal, which in Rawls’ perspective is an injustice because its placing certain individuals higher than others. Rawls would view the situation the same as he viewed distribution of wealth and income, except the moral inquiry would now be the distribution of a negative good which would be punishment among individuals pertaining particularly to certain racial groups. Therefore, if Rawls proposed a solution, it would be that although there would still be some type of punishment institution to house those who are a severe threat to the community in order to protect society, we would choose arrangements that would respect the humanity of each individual. Also he would also examine the “social division of responsibility” between society and individuals. For example when we are about to arrest or convict an individual for possessing or deal drugs, one must also consider everything to ensure that each individual continues to face a decent opportunity for a good life.…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although his critique of mass incarceration maybe harsh under several of his principles the problem can be fixed. Rawls suggestion is that you imagine yourself in an original position in society under a veil of ignorance. Being behind the veil means that you do not know anything about yourself and your natural abilities. You also are unaware of your race, sex, nationality, and talents. In other words, you are being born into the world blind to everything.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am here to discuss the reasons why the individual would choose to pick life without possibility of parole in the case of a robber killing a store owner and being charged with 2nd degree murder. With the case of the individual jury person one of the things about him is that one of his children is in law enforcement, this little amount of evidence shows why he would choose life without parole is because he respects the law and the punishment of the judicial system, defendant shown as a threat to society and he had a weapon. After the veil of ignorance the position is still the same because we believe that the defendant will be a danger to society and needs to be locked up from the public.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rawls’ “Theory of Justice” was one of the first formulations of this type of reflective equilibrium as he proposed that individuals under the “original position” would construct their version of justice through WRE. Under the “original position”, individuals weigh their moral judgements and considerations in an effort to choose among competing principles and construct a feasible conception of justice for which people could easily…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Charles Mills Democracy

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This, he writes, is a hypothetical situation where political decision makers are rational, do not care about the affairs of their peers, have a sense of justice and what is good, and operate under a veil of ignorance. It is this same hypothetical veil of ignorance which is both the most important element to this theory working, but also what breaks it. Under a veil of ignorance, those making decisions on behalf of society will not know who they are going to be in said society. This, Rawls states, leads them to make moral decisions which, if anything, work to the advantage of the least fortunate. Unfortunately, as effective as this may actually be in addressing the issues with democracy today, there is no real way to carry this out in the real world.…

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his work, Theory of Justice, John Rawls describes two principles in which he describes his theory for distributive justice. Rawls interprets the goods described in distributive justice as the power and wealth that stem from institutional positions. The first principle asserts that, “each individual has an equal right to the most extensive liberty compatible with like liberty for all”. (503)…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As I stated above, Rawls indicated that everyone be given equal rights no matter the circumstances. He also implied, that the disadvantage should be given a chance to improve, and I couldn’t agree more. If people aren’t given a chance how are they supposed to improve in…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Once we have stepped behind this boundary we are able to think freely about the nature of social justice. Rawls’ suggests we think this way because by thinking from our emotionally charged subjective biases the truth may be blurred and one may put their values to an advantage in a matter involving who may be guilty or innocent. The idea is to think from pure logic and not be blinded by who we are individually. The two principles consist of the Principle of Equal Liberty and the Difference Principle. The Principle of Equal Liberty follows the egalitarian concept that each person has an equal right to the most extensive liberties compatible with similar liberties for all.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    John Rawls in his book Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (2001) characterizes how idealized reasoners, reason in order to validate the two “principles of justice” (42) in a “basic structure” (10) leading to a “well-ordered society” (8). The idealized reasoners do some kind of calculation. With the “original position” (14) and the “veil of ignorance” (15) idealized reasoners can understand the “difference principle” (61). This is an important element of creating a well-ordered society. Mills finds issue with how Rawls uses this ideal as something we should follow.…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (Rousseau 108). Within the first principle of justice, Rawls looks to promote the same principals as Rousseau. They each see the importance of having equal basic liberties for each individual. For Rousseau, equality promotes a political community that protects individuals from problems found in commercial society. For Rawls, equality is central to the fairness and justice that he looks to emphasize.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    John Rawls theory of social justice developed over time with the publishing of various books he wrote, such as A Theory of Justice and Political Liberalism. In A Theory of Justice, he determines the “Circumstances of Justice.” These circumstances assume justice applies to a “definite geographical territory and that the subjects of justice are “roughly similar in…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays