The Ethical Codes Of Philip Zimbardo's Prison Experiment

Improved Essays
In 1971, Philip Zimbardo conducted a social experiment called Stanford Experiment at the Stanford psychology departments basement. Which the basement for Stanford was converted to a real prison. Over 70 college students reached out to the add that was put up in the newspaper about this experiment. Only 24 random college men to be the “prisoners”, and a few men to be the “guards” in this experiment. Zimbardo would pay them 15 dollars a day till the experiment was over, which had to last 2 weeks. The Palo Alto police surprised the men by arrested at the location they were in and was taken to the Stanford psychology department basement. They were assigned an imaginary case and number when they were entering the prison.
The men that took the
…show more content…
There could be things to be improved but it was really creative to build a prison in a basement. Researchers would not be able to conduct this experiment, even though it would be really interesting if they did. They would not because this experiment does not match up the numerous ethical codes, for example the American Psychological Associates. The American Psychological Associates is a large professional and scientific organization of psychology in the United States. Zimbardo did recognize he did fail this ethical codes for his prison experiment, which is big on his part.
If I could be a psychologist for a while and I can redo this experiment, which would be pretty awesome. I would change a few things, first would be to actually do it in a real prison because just remaking a prison in a basement is not that convenient for the participants. Second, I would not let the guards harass and dehumanize the prisoner as much as they did in Zimbardo 's experiment. I think that really affected the study and let it not last as he expected. Lastly, I would like to pick different ethnicities as guards and prisoners, to evaluate how each ethnicity would behave. By me changing these few things I feel like the experiment would last longer than what Zimbardo lasted. Since the guards would be so brutal to the prisoners they did not last like he planned. By having my guards act more modern to our guards from prison, they would actually last and we could actually see if the prisoners would be different. Having different ethnicities would really change the experiment because we would actually see how all different ethnicities act and be in the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Zimbardo wanted to see how quickly the guards would adapt to their role as actual prison guards and assert their authority and dominance on the prisoners. He saw that they adapted too quickly; they developed the “authoritarian personality” (pg. 231). The prison guards tormented the prisoners so much that Zimbardo had to end the experiment after one week instead of…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As we look ahead, however, it is an important question to consider. The boys who participated in Zimbardo 's Prison Experiment did not suffer any lasting affects. Had the experiment not been discontinued, however, who knows what might have occurred. When conducting psycological experiments, it is important to protect the subjects from lasting harm. If we loose sight of that goal, we loose more of our humanity than research findings could ever provide us…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe they experience more unethical issues than Milgram’s. The prisoners wasn’t protected from psychological harm. If it’s just an experiment, why should people become emotionally distressed and humiliated? One prisoner had to be released after one day because of a mental breakdown. Also, Zimbardo wasn’t aware of other things that was going on.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A psychology professor at Stanford University by the name of Philip G. Zimbardo created a controlled experiment of a clear strife between good versus evil, it brought people from a good upbringing into a situation of power play. The Stanford Prison Experiment is a notorious example of how roles and expectations shape people and can alter original morals, actions, and thoughts. In August of 1971 a job advertisement was put into the local newspaper for a psychological experiment on how prison life effects the mind that would pay fifteen dollars a day. Around seventy applicants who responded were psychologically interviewed by Craig Haney and Curt Banks.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This came at cost with the catastrophic effects the experiment brought on the participants. The Stanford prison Experiment is noted as a “classic experiment in the psychology of human behavior (Onishi & Herbert, 2016). In this experiment, Professor Phillip Zimbardo wanted to study the effects of labels and…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A basement was turned into a mock prison, and hired students to be the guards and prisoners. The prisoners were grabbed at their homes by the guards and brought in and treated like real criminals to keep the experiment as real as possible. The guards worked in groups of threes for eight hour shifts and then switched. Zimbardo monitored everything and acted as the prison's warden, both the prisoners and guards adapted quickly to their new found roles. Within hours some guards started acting in a brutal and sadistic manner, and soon after more joined in.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    As a prisoner in the Stanford experiment I would have felt degraded and dehumanized. All hope for a life outside would be diminished. As a guard I would have been glad there was no hope outside because I could be in control for longer. Power is one of the best feelings for everyone, but the Stanford prison guards took it to extremes because it was not real; they were all students, they had never committed any known felonies. Though Zimbardo has said that the prison system is getting worse it does not change the fact that his experiment was wrong.…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The experiment started off with the volunteers adopting their roles quickly and easily, with guards exercising control, and the prisoners being compliant. Soon, the prisoners began adopting realistic behavior where they would abandon their solidarity and seek to benefit from other inmates infringements. With the prisoners being dehumanized with pointless orders, insults, boring jobs, and physical punishment (push-ups), it was clear that the guards began to act tyrannical in their environment. On the mere second day, there was a rebellion. Prisoners ripped off their numbers and barricaded their doors to seek protection and distance to insult and mock the guards.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanford Prison Experiment What prevented "good guards" from objecting or countermanding the orders from tough or bad guards? The good guards were unable to object or countermand the bad guards because of the fear of what it would do to the guards’ authoritative role in the eyes of the prisoners. If they showed disunity as guards the prisoners could take advantage of the unstructured and create chaos within the walls of the prison. By objecting to the bad guards, they take the risk of the prisoners not taking the guards orders seriously.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to obtain candidates for the experiment, an advertisement was placed in the newspaper for anyone who wanted to participate in the study of how life was in prison. Seventy-five men were interviewed for the roles, but of those seventy-five, only twenty-four were chosen. They were selected at random to take and perform the roles of either prison guards or inmates. The experiment was meant to last two weeks’ time, but at the end of just six days, it was apparent that it should come to a close. Phil Zimbardo, the conductor of this experiment, was a teacher of psychology at the university.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Source A McLeod, Saul. Stanford Prison experiment. SimplyPsychology, 2008. Web. 12 Feb. 2016.…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    On August 14, 1971 Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment called the Stanford Prison Experiment took off. Young men were offered $15 a day to take part in a mock prison experiment in the basement of the Stanford University Psychology Department. The men were divided into either prison guards or prisoners, this experiment was only to last two weeks. Upon the prisoners arrival at the make shifted prison they were stripped off their clothes and sprayed with disinfecting spray. Each prisoner was issued a dress as a uniform with their prison identification number on the back and front.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    If I was Zimbardo, I would have firstly set up some sort of guidelines for the guards. Rules against physical and mental abuse would be set into place to combat the breaking of Standard 3.04. With rules set into place preventing harm, the major amounts of stress and sadness exerted on the prisoners would have been avoided. This would have prevented emotional breakdowns that occurred to many prisoners in the real experiment. Another change I would make, would be towards my role as the sociologist.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If this experiment was done today Philip Zimbardo would be arrested for abuse because this experiment is very illegal. This experiment helped prove Philip Zimbardo’s theory could good people turn evil and the answer is yes. The power goes to your heads because in the 6 days that the guards were awful to the prisoners the next week they were all best friends again and no one mistreated anyone. When they were interviewed later they all said that they didn’t know what came over them but they had power and the…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Phillip Zimbardo (1972) gave us notable understandings into human behaviour, even though considered an unethical study. In the scandalous experiment, a group of participants completed a study in a mock prison environment. Some of the participants took on the role of prisoner, and others acted as the guards. The guards behaved in an inhumane and demeaning way towards the participants acting as prisoners. They were not given full details e.g. on what to expect and how to behave.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays