Zero Tolerance Laws

Security presence can help forestall school violence in the U.S., along with visual and sound-related radio frameworks to keep undesirable guests from entering, in addition to a zero-resilience arrangement for weapons for all students and school faculty. Due to schools lacking in proper preventive means, troublesome events have occurred which leads, to the belief that schools are no longer as secure of an environment as they once were; to reverse this, schools must enforce more severe protective means.
Due to an outbreak in suburban school violence in the 1990s, zero tolerance laws remain in effect on many campuses. According to the findings on gun control policies in schools by author and activist, Dr. Finley, it is a fact that "the 1990 Gun-Free School Zones Act required …show more content…
Further, more than 50 percent of students who were involved in school-related arrests or referred to law enforcement are Hispanic or African American." (Finley 116). Critics claim that zero-tolerance laws neglect to address the root issues that provoke the youth into possessing weapons, drug, or alcohol on school grounds, thus not succeeding in their job to help kids change their bad habits. Zero resilience laws just push the issue into the hands of the community. Consequently, suspension or expulsion will only escalate the probability that a student will have some kind of involvement with the criminal system. In spite of the fact that data does not show a tremendous drop in crime committed by youth, zero resilience laws are utilized in numerous schools.
Equally important to the safety students, school settings have been progressively utilizing security personnel as a method of expanding protective means in schools. The idea is that officers on school grounds will not only hinder youth from taking part in brutal or unlawful conduct, but also be able to quickly take care of any situation. Supporters of hiring school officers