Overall the project went well. I enjoyed and appreciated the opportunity to complete this assignment. The process of interviewing people helped me to better understand friends I thought I already knew and to connect with them further. The process also allowed me to view what students can learn from a youth group but also how youth group teachings can lack. For example, in some situations, students may not be diving deep enough into the word to get a grasp of why values like cheating and lying can be unethical.
I completed five phone interviews and five face-to-face interviews. I also worked on making the conclusions based on the data. I evaluated how we could answer the question: “Are adults helping or hindering adolescent growth.” After …show more content…
If we had extra time, it would have been a beneficial idea for us to meet just to discuss our conclusion to make them deeper and more concrete. I also would perhaps add a concrete way in which we can see the implications of our conclusions within a youth group. Had we met an extra time, we would have also realized any confusion in the order of who is presenting and quickly fixed that. Nonetheless, we did work hard, all gave up the time to do interviews, to meet together and finish all our work.
Considering all this, we could have improved but we still presented the important parts of our project. Based on the analysis of the whole project, I would give Michael a 97, Maggie a 97 and Pat a 97. I feel we did do a good job on this assignment and that the work was truly split evenly.
As a group, we had a friendly and respectful dynamic and so that helped everything to run smoothly. Also, it helped that we had Pat as our designated leader. We worked efficiently which helped us to focus on the assignment itself. While we could have improved on a few aspects of the information we were presenting, we really did make some deep conclusion. It was interesting, for me at least, as I saw how my mind had changed about Clark’s conclusion to see he was not exaggerating in his claims. I enjoyed the chance to talk to people through this project as well and enjoyed working with Maggie, Michael and
I completed five phone interviews and five face-to-face interviews. I also worked on making the conclusions based on the data. I evaluated how we could answer the question: “Are adults helping or hindering adolescent growth.” After …show more content…
If we had extra time, it would have been a beneficial idea for us to meet just to discuss our conclusion to make them deeper and more concrete. I also would perhaps add a concrete way in which we can see the implications of our conclusions within a youth group. Had we met an extra time, we would have also realized any confusion in the order of who is presenting and quickly fixed that. Nonetheless, we did work hard, all gave up the time to do interviews, to meet together and finish all our work.
Considering all this, we could have improved but we still presented the important parts of our project. Based on the analysis of the whole project, I would give Michael a 97, Maggie a 97 and Pat a 97. I feel we did do a good job on this assignment and that the work was truly split evenly.
As a group, we had a friendly and respectful dynamic and so that helped everything to run smoothly. Also, it helped that we had Pat as our designated leader. We worked efficiently which helped us to focus on the assignment itself. While we could have improved on a few aspects of the information we were presenting, we really did make some deep conclusion. It was interesting, for me at least, as I saw how my mind had changed about Clark’s conclusion to see he was not exaggerating in his claims. I enjoyed the chance to talk to people through this project as well and enjoyed working with Maggie, Michael and