Is Young's decision defensible? Why or why not?
Young's decision is defensible because the school has to assure that the situation does not create a burden on the school. According to related services, under IDEA, Young must assure that disabled children are able to benefit from the special education services. The Board of Education of Hendrick Hunson Central School v. Rowley in "concluding that a child is not entitled to a public education unless he or she can benefit from it" (Essex, 2012, p. 131). "The interests of all pupils must be safeguarded" (Runswick-Cole, 2008, p. 173).
Is the parents' request reasonable under the law? Why or why not?
The parents' request is reasonable under the law because the parents have the right to address the school about matters concerning their child's development. It is stated that "parents' rights must be respected and addressed in matters relating to evaluation and IEP development" (Essex, 2012, p. 152). The parents are obligated to assure that their child is receiving the proper treatment and education because if not it can lead to academic injury or physical injury to Jonathan. His parents …show more content…
Why or why not?
The provision of a nurse is a related service if it is necessary for Jonathan to receive an appropriate education. Related service is viewed as one that must be provided to allow the child with disabilities to benefit from special education. Related services can be a single service or an entire range of services that can help benefit Jonathan so he'll receive an appropriate education. Young must be certain that the administration takes in regards of the Irving Independent School District v. Tatro, "regarding the differences between medical services and related services" (Essex, 2012, p. 152).
How do you think a court would rule in this case? Provide a rationale for your
Young's decision is defensible because the school has to assure that the situation does not create a burden on the school. According to related services, under IDEA, Young must assure that disabled children are able to benefit from the special education services. The Board of Education of Hendrick Hunson Central School v. Rowley in "concluding that a child is not entitled to a public education unless he or she can benefit from it" (Essex, 2012, p. 131). "The interests of all pupils must be safeguarded" (Runswick-Cole, 2008, p. 173).
Is the parents' request reasonable under the law? Why or why not?
The parents' request is reasonable under the law because the parents have the right to address the school about matters concerning their child's development. It is stated that "parents' rights must be respected and addressed in matters relating to evaluation and IEP development" (Essex, 2012, p. 152). The parents are obligated to assure that their child is receiving the proper treatment and education because if not it can lead to academic injury or physical injury to Jonathan. His parents …show more content…
Why or why not?
The provision of a nurse is a related service if it is necessary for Jonathan to receive an appropriate education. Related service is viewed as one that must be provided to allow the child with disabilities to benefit from special education. Related services can be a single service or an entire range of services that can help benefit Jonathan so he'll receive an appropriate education. Young must be certain that the administration takes in regards of the Irving Independent School District v. Tatro, "regarding the differences between medical services and related services" (Essex, 2012, p. 152).
How do you think a court would rule in this case? Provide a rationale for your