Young Turks Genocide

Improved Essays
In 1915, a group called the Young Turks had been in power since 1908 when Sultan Hamid II was overthrown. The Turks developed a distrust towards the Armenians, who were Christians and not Muslim, which the Turkish people were. The Armenians and the Turks cohabitated in the same area, the Ottoman Empire. Eventually, the Turks wanted to drive the Armenians out of their land, and the controversy got very violent. The United States government should recognize the events of 1915 in Armenia as a genocide. A genocide is defined as the “deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation.” This kind of killing was systematic and had been planned thoroughly. Although the Americans have a trade of oil with Turkey, and declaring this situation a genocide could put the United States in an unfavorable position with Turkey, the country must see it how it is depicted. Before 1915, other occurrences had taken place. In 1909, at the city of Adana, there had been a Turkish massacre, where many Armenians lost their lives. Sultan, who had been the ruler before the Young Turks, had not agreed with Armenians and had an unrest towards them. When the Young Turks came to power, Armenians believed things might turn around for them. However, the Young Turks also looked upon the Armenians in the same way …show more content…
The Turks see it as an act of war since they had been on opposing sides and believe the Armenians had completely turned on them. In actual fact, the Armenians had joined the opposite side after they were already singled out in the empire, and had different laws under the Turks. The United States should agree with the Armenians because this bloody massacre follows the exact definition of what a genocide is. There had been a deliberate killing (Turks killed them and kicked them out of their land) of a large group of people, the Armenians, especially those of a particular ethnic group,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Soon reports came in that the Armenian men had been taken into the mountains and killed by Turkish guards. In one incident, on July 5, 1915, about 800 Armenian men were arrested, marched out of town into the mountains and slaughtered. Turkish soldiers, who began the massacre using their rifles, were ordered not to waste bullets and to employ their bayonets instead. Davis did the best he could, offering the protection of his consulate to many Armenians, holding the property of “deportees”. He investigated reports of massacres and helped some Armenians to escape, when aiding Armenians was a crime punishable by…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Historical fiction is a very controversial genre for avid readers or historians. This is because there are many different ways for an author to write a historical fiction novel. An author can chose to focus more on the historical accuracy of the novel or more on the fiction aspect of their story. But the overall intention of historical novels are to explain historical events in ways that will not only inform the audience but also educate them. Forgotten Fire by Adam Bagdasarian is a historical novel centered around the life of Vahan Kenderian during the Armenian genocide of the eighteenth century.…

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the past hundred of years many genocide atrocities have occurred, taking a toll on human lives, and influencing the history of countries worldwide. The Armenian Genocide and Cambodian Genocide occurred at two very different times, but there are connections between the two that make them comparable. The Armenian Genocide beginning on April 24, 1915 was under the rule of the Young Turks, who wanted to to turkify the Ottoman Empire, by ridding it of any Non- Turks, especially those of whom were Christian. During the seven years of this destructive genocide nearly one point five million Armenians were dead or removed from the country, yet the Turkish government today does not acknowledge the genocide happening. Along with the Armenian Genocide,…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The aggressors was Hitler and his German soldiers that did the bad things. They did bad things to the Jews and their family's. They were killing them, making them go into the death showers, and not feeding them, also making sure they have good health. The Armenian Genocide, was the first genocide of the 20th Century, occurred when two million Armenians living in Turkey.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The aggressors of the Armenians were the Turks while the Nazis were the aggressors of the Holocaust. The two mass executions took the lives of millions of innocent…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the Turks felt their power being tested by the Armenians, they took military action against them. The Turks believe what was done was understandable and necessary to protect the state’s survival from the rebellious Armenians in a time of war. Those on the Armenian’s side say that the huge deportations and massacres of the unthreatening, peaceful Armenian people by the unrelenting Turks should be considered genocide. Those in favor of the Turks are mostly from the Turkish State and also include some historians. Many deniers of the genocide will blame the Armenians, saying: (Suny 932).…

    • 1331 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In May of 1915, the Allied Powers accused the Young Turk regime of crimes against humanity. In 1919, the Ottoman government persecuted leaders of the Young Turks of crimes of massacre. After 1920, Turkey obligated itself to the apprehension of those responsible for the massacres. The international community never questioned the accuracy of the reports of extermination, although they should have. In 1923 the international community abandoned the Armenians, but after the Holocaust they revisited the crimes committed against the Armenians.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Armenian Holocaust

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Armenian Holocaust was a time of pure and utter despair, it was a brutal genocide that killed approximately 1.5 million people. It took place in the Ottoman Empire; the Turkish Armenians wanted to make the empire thoroughly Turkish and they especially wanted to get the Christian Armenians out of the empire. As a result, there were massacres and deportations that ended in many deaths of horrific exterminations. The exterminations consisted of torturing, enslavement, and deportations with no food or water to go along, all in order to “cleanse” the Turkish nation.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The world’s reaction to the Rwandan genocide in 1994 is widely considered as one of the biggest failures of humanity and the UN, hundreds of thousands of innocent lives were lost over the course of the 100 day mass killing. The response has been described as” too little, too late” as an earlier intervention could have saved many more lives, which brings the question why did the world wait? Why did we fail all of these innocent people? The answer lies within the structure of our world’s political system and the different ideals and definitions of key concepts by different states. While no one state can be blamed completely for the lack of aid, the Rwandan genocide brought forward the need for a more comprehensive action plan for intervention…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Armenians were treated very poorly, killed in many different ways and the Turkification had begun. The Turkish government had declared war on the Ottoman Empire. Armenians were arrested and sent on death marches out into the Mesopotamian desert with no food or water during World War I. The Turkification campaign had begun. They consisted of government squads of the Turkish.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The word Genocide means killing or destroying members of an ethic group because of their race, nationality or religion. It is one of the worst crimes that people ever came across when thousands and millions of people were murdered. From 1992-1995 that was happening in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Bosnia is a country in south-eastern Europe that emerged after the break-up of Yugoslavia in 1980. The conflict between the three main ethnic groups in Bosnia, the Serbs, Croats, and Muslims, resulted in genocide committed by the Serbs against the Muslims in this…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One scene does not symbolize the actions that I believe are to be criticized; rather the continuous action of the group as a whole in multiple scenes. In a survival aspect, it’s hard not to look at the situation in an apocalyptic sense, Walking Dead manner per se. The group’s goal is to get as far away from the turkish controlled area as possible. With adding on wounded and weak refugees on the trek how is the group going to survive? Soon Darwinism will begin to take place and you’ll be left with a large group of more innocent armenians murdered.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Genocide Dbq

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Can the World Resolve the Problem of Genocide? Is it possible for the World to fully stop what we consider genocide? In accordance with Document I: Ethnic cleansing was an attempt to instill fear and devastation in Bosnia, but complete extermination such as genocide was not the intention. I think it would be difficult for us to control the crimes being committed by a certain ethnic group of people against another. We do not have enough resources to oversee what everyone is doing at all times.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Ottoman Empire was founded in 1299, and collapsed in 1922. It was one of the long lasting empires in the world from middle ages to modern times. According to Quataert, the Ottoman Empire was a significant non-Western country. The success of the Ottoman Empire in the world began with the Byzantine Empire’s failures because besides other positive things, diversity or multiculturalism and religious tolerance in the Ottoman Empire empowered the Empire, and made the Empire live long. As for the research question that is how the diversity affected on the Ottoman Empire, and how the Ottoman Empire used its advantages for years, multiculturalism embraces all ethnic and religious communities and tries to keep them together.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many Turks started to come into central Anatolia after the Battle of Manzikert which led Byzantine Empire into an economic crisis. There were many Muslim states in Anatolia competing with each other for territory. Ertugrul Gazi, Osman I`s father, led his group to move towards to the west Anatolia. Osman I was the founder of the Ottoman Empire. In his lifetime, Ottoman was not an empire, it was just a state.…

    • 1825 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays