Hi Mung, # 106:
_____________________________________________
"It is the YEC approach that drags religion into the discussion. YEC literally takes its cues from materialistic assumptions of unguided evolution. God would not do it that way."
____________________________________________
It is ID, OEC, YEC, and theistic evolutionism that drags religion into the discussion, in a wide range of spiritual formats.
It is inevitable when speaking of the beginning and creation. Scripture begins: "In the beginning...."
You say, "YEC literally takes its cues from materialistic assumptions of unguided evolution." That is plain wrong. You surprise me Mung.
God literally said in stone He created, direct, fast, in kinds and in six days, all fit for
_____________________________________________
"It is the YEC approach that drags religion into the discussion. YEC literally takes its cues from materialistic assumptions of unguided evolution. God would not do it that way."
____________________________________________
It is ID, OEC, YEC, and theistic evolutionism that drags religion into the discussion, in a wide range of spiritual formats.
It is inevitable when speaking of the beginning and creation. Scripture begins: "In the beginning...."
You say, "YEC literally takes its cues from materialistic assumptions of unguided evolution." That is plain wrong. You surprise me Mung.
God literally said in stone He created, direct, fast, in kinds and in six days, all fit for