Xlandia Government Essay

Superior Essays
We have received your letter regarding our assignment for “Preliminary Recommendations.” Since you no longer have a dictatorship and need a new system of government, we are providing you with a guide of multiple options that can best suit your government. We have thoroughly researched Xlandia as well as its’ past experiences with government. We have delved into the people of Xlandia, their ethnicities and religions, as well as the economy, the jobs and the population. We are knowledgeable of the past dictatorship and its’ political and economic conditions. Therefore, we have created what we think will be a very efficient and beneficial form of government for Xlandia. A major aspect of forming a strong government is creating a written constitution. …show more content…
As opposed to being appointed by a monarch or the legislative branch, the chief executive should be chosen by popular vote. Although Turkey’s chief executive is chosen by the prime minister, we don’t feel this would be beneficial to Xlandia. Xlandia has a relatively small population, so we feel that they should be involved in selecting their president. After not having a government for so long, the citizens of Xlandia will have to learn to gain trust in their new government. Keeping Xlandia’s best interests in mind, we think that the executive role should be played by one executive as opposed to two executives. We think that Xlandia should enforce a presidential system, similar to that in the United States but unlike Turkey. A presidential system allows the citizens to give feedback on the government as well as being able to impeach the president if necessary. Previously Xlandia was under the rule of a dictatorship. The citizens were therefore unable to have a say in their laws or have their choice of executive. Therefore, a presidential system must be established to ensure that the country has the citizens’ best interests in mind. The president should be able to veto laws as well as suggest them to the congress. However the laws should only be able to be passed if they are both signed by the president and agreed upon by the congress. In only a presidential …show more content…
Two choices you have are to create either a unitarian or bicameral system in the legislative branch. A bicameral legislature is not the best choice for Xlandia, because your current population is small. A bicameral system involves two chambers who pass laws. Two houses passing the law would not be necessary because of the population size. In a bicameral system the laws won’t be past as efficiently or quickly as they would in a unicameral system. A unicameral system would serve the best for Xlandia. The legislature would only have one house and only pass laws from one chamber. The citizens of Xlandia will once again have the opportunity to vote for the members of the legislature which in this case would be a unicameral system. The citizens would only have the need to vote for one house of representatives, as opposed to representatives of many states or regions, which don’t apply to your country. As representatives of Turkey, one of the aspects of our government we are most proud of is our unicameral system. We are confident this system will benefit Xlandia as much as it has benefited us. Other countries like the U.S. follows a federal system which divides the congress into a senate and House of Representatives. But, we feel one house would be most efficient and beneficial for your new government system. A unicameral system passes laws faster and has more accountability since there is no opposing

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Choosing a president and vice-president is a very important decision. It is one that is left up to the Electoral College and not the popular vote. This paper discussed the structure and functions of the electoral election, compared the Electoral College to popular vote and assessed the value of an individual citizen’s vote under the Electoral College. It seems that most people may be on the fence about keeping the Electoral College, but it would be a difficult process to amend these…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A representative alternative that has been previously proposed was that of a Triple E Senate. A Triple E Senate would be comprised of elected senators versus the unrepresentative appointment of individuals by the Prime Minister (Makarenko, 2006). An elected Senate would benefit the entire nation as it would allow different regions and provinces to choose exactly who would best represent their interests, versus the Prime Minister practicing political patronage. The triple E Senate would also permit,…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A strong democracy is essential for a state’s freedoms, liberties, and its well being. In order to obtain these notions, a democracy must receive legitimacy from the people. Legitimacy is the concept in which the people believe and give their consent to the government for its right to rule. A democracy functions accordingly to people’s will, and legitimacy will only fortify a democracy as the people will be allowed to judge and express opinions to make final decisions regarding the status of government officials and their privilege to hold power and rule over the state and citizens. As a first time democracy, Xlandia can begin to build legitimacy as it “binds itself to the rule of law.” With a government that follows off a constitution including the guidelines of providing fair and equal rights, the people of Xlandia who were ruled under a leader with abusive power, will accept and trust a…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Electoral College Faulty

    • 1346 Words
    • 5 Pages

    By voting the people can elect new representatives, senators, or even presidents to replace one that did not follow through with their agenda. Through the fear of not being elected once again, the elected officials will be more inclined to listen to the people. Between the people and government, this is the largest check and balance. When the system of electing becomes skewed against the people, it is a major cause of concern. The country was built on certain principles, and the people have a right to exercise these rights. The Electoral College, as this author believes, will destroy this major check and balance. What impact does this have on his view of the broader institutional setting? The system is not one of equality. Democracy should be where every vote and person’s opinion matters. However, in the Electoral College, the only votes that matter are where population is extraordinarily low. Also, when the people’s popular vote does not match the electoral winner, then the system fails. Therefore, the people’s choice does not matter. This causes him to believe that the institution is failing as a democracy.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution is an amazing document that was an aspiration of the founding fathers and the included preamble outlines the freedoms they sought out. The preamble begins with “We the People of the United States…”, our founding fathers created a list of actions they wished to pursue within the beginning of the constitution. The dysfunctional colonies were inspired by their words and in turn become united for a new cause. Clearly, the government over seas wasn’t working efficiently so they embarked on the creation of a new form of government . The preamble, “ to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this chapter it describes the type of government is used and the pros and cons. According to Johannes, “the Parliamentary government is the type of government that rest on the principle of concentrating political power, fusing legislative, and executive authority (16).” This type of government is considered to be effective and efficient. This type of government depends on strong political parties. The political parties elect their members using different methods, however, there are pros and cons in Parliamentary government. This government can be effective and efficient but has numerous vulnerabilities. Johannes stated a question, “would a parliamentary system be preferable to the American presidential system (18)?” However, who can truly say what type of government is prime. Every government is going to possess vulnerabilities. Moreover, I don 't believe that a Parliamentary government will benefit the American government since the American government is based on freedom and the people. A Parliamentary system gives entirely too much power to the leader and America’s government separates the party, however, the president is the leader. Therefore, I disagree that a Parliamentary system will benefit the American…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Livonia Case Study

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This government structure also has a high chance of returning the country back to its communist past because of the presidential voting system. Because of the one-round plurality election, the KGC may end up getting more votes than all the other parties. This is because HAL is split into six different groups and so instead of having one big group to compete with the KGC, the HAL are split into six different groups that could all possibly end up smaller than the KGC. The first option may cause Livonia to end up being led by an extremist leader because of the long presidential term and lack of term limits. The long presidential term may cause a president to eventually become corrupt and maybe even a dictator. The lack of term limits also makes it possible for a president to constantly be reelected which may end up hurting the country even though the country voted for that president in the first place because the unlimited time in power may cause presidents to use the seat of power for their own uses rather than to improve the country. The only way of ending a President’s term in office is to prove him/her guilty of “committing severe crimes” which are terms that I find too vague because it is up to interpretation rather than strict guidelines that the President cannot talk his/her way out of. The system is also inefficient when it comes to the topic of…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Government Power

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “It would seem as if the rulers of our time sought only to use men in order to make things great; I wish that they would try a little more to make great men; that they would set less value on the work and more upon the workman; that they would not forget that a nation cannot long remain strong when every man belonging to it is individually weak.” (Tocqueville 2) Mark R. Levin exemplifies a highly intelligent and practical plan that, if enacted, would strip away the overbearing amount of power that has been acquired by our federal government. This power is not helping the American public. As the government becomes more powerful, we, the people, lose our freedoms, our privacies, and our individuality. “Such a power does not destroy, but it prevents…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert Dahl On Democracy

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A polyarchal democracy is a governing system that fulfills two main requirements; it has six institutions that work to ensure the participation and freedoms of the states’ citizens and these institutions are being applied to large bodies of people, not small city-states. Dahl summarizes that the institutions needed for a polyarchal democracy are free, fair, and frequent elections, freedom of expression, alternative sources of information, associational autonomy, and inclusive citizenship, which all culminate to ensuring maximum participation from a states citizens. Polyarchal democracies by virtue of having these institutions are ultimately inclusive (Dahl 90-91). In addition, the culture created by the institutions, by the system of democratic government instills a democratic practice among the citizenry. Those accustomed to free and fair elections continue the tradition. As well, the institutions that are founded to insure rights, for example the constitution, as deified in the minds of those participating. The symbol of democracy in a polyarchy is weighted more heavily than the reality of if these institutions are sufficiently…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article, “The Perils of Presidentialism” Juan Linz observe that there are few stable democracies that have presidential systems of government. On the contrary, there are many parliamentary democracies and historically, they have performed better. Three major problems of presidential systems can be deduced from his essay; 1) Dual legitimacy, 2) fixed term, and 3) winner-takes-all logic. After explaining all three problems, this paper argues that winner-takes-all logic is as much applicable to parliamentary systems as it is to presidential systems.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s world democracy is the most popular and encouraged form of government. However in its history, it was given birth to in an era that witnessed the use and implementation of most of its counterparts. I like to call those forms of government, democracy’s predecessors. Even though some or all of them were practiced after democracy came to existence, they were once considered as problems to which democracy was the solution. I will now examine each of these terms in the context of the Ancient Greek states and see how they all vary from one another.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Compared to the Presidential system, the Parliamentary system is more favourable to a healthy democracy. This essay will discuss the relationship between the Parliamentary and Presidential systems’ executive and legislative powers and the ways they differ from one another.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The transition to democracy for a new country has it’s foundations in what system it uses, and how well it uses it. This means that for countries such as Livonia, picking the correct system is critical in stabilizing and maintaining democracy as well as transitioning to a market economy. One must be objective and clear when it comes to reviewing which of the two options is best for Livonia.…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Presidential election system of the United States is done by the participation of the people, the Congress, the State Government and the Electoral candidates. Although there are four segments of the election process but there is a constant dependency in a single form of governance i.e. the democracy. In the United States, there are several political factions with different set of ideologies however they are not able to participate in the election process actively due to the dominance of the State government and the Congress that follows democracy in the nation. Therefore, there are some reforms that are required to be implemented in the election process in order to allow people to have more choices rather than only single form of government. There should be a centralized voting format and the people should have the access to elect their preferred political party. The political party along with the Congress could nominate the President because it would reduce the dependency on the Electoral College. Furthermore, people would be able to elect their preferred group and President directly instead of electing the Electoral members…

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are two different systems of a democratic government, parliamentary and presidential, which are seen in multiple countries across the world. World powers such as the Canada and the United Kingdom thrive with their parliamentary system while the United States of America has shown stability and power with their presidential system. While both parliamentary and presidential systems have benefits and drawbacks, parliamentary systems are evidently more democratic because it gives majority of its power to the people by allowing them to call for a vote of no confidence and not setting maximum limits to prime minister term periods. This paper will compare and contrast the two democratic systems, discuss the benefits and critiques of each and finally examine why…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays