Xlandia Government Essay

Better Essays
We have received your letter regarding our assignment for “Preliminary Recommendations.” Since you no longer have a dictatorship and need a new system of government, we are providing you with a guide of multiple options that can best suit your government. We have thoroughly researched Xlandia as well as its’ past experiences with government. We have delved into the people of Xlandia, their ethnicities and religions, as well as the economy, the jobs and the population. We are knowledgeable of the past dictatorship and its’ political and economic conditions. Therefore, we have created what we think will be a very efficient and beneficial form of government for Xlandia. A major aspect of forming a strong government is creating a written constitution. …show more content…
As opposed to being appointed by a monarch or the legislative branch, the chief executive should be chosen by popular vote. Although Turkey’s chief executive is chosen by the prime minister, we don’t feel this would be beneficial to Xlandia. Xlandia has a relatively small population, so we feel that they should be involved in selecting their president. After not having a government for so long, the citizens of Xlandia will have to learn to gain trust in their new government. Keeping Xlandia’s best interests in mind, we think that the executive role should be played by one executive as opposed to two executives. We think that Xlandia should enforce a presidential system, similar to that in the United States but unlike Turkey. A presidential system allows the citizens to give feedback on the government as well as being able to impeach the president if necessary. Previously Xlandia was under the rule of a dictatorship. The citizens were therefore unable to have a say in their laws or have their choice of executive. Therefore, a presidential system must be established to ensure that the country has the citizens’ best interests in mind. The president should be able to veto laws as well as suggest them to the congress. However the laws should only be able to be passed if they are both signed by the president and agreed upon by the congress. In only a presidential …show more content…
Two choices you have are to create either a unitarian or bicameral system in the legislative branch. A bicameral legislature is not the best choice for Xlandia, because your current population is small. A bicameral system involves two chambers who pass laws. Two houses passing the law would not be necessary because of the population size. In a bicameral system the laws won’t be past as efficiently or quickly as they would in a unicameral system. A unicameral system would serve the best for Xlandia. The legislature would only have one house and only pass laws from one chamber. The citizens of Xlandia will once again have the opportunity to vote for the members of the legislature which in this case would be a unicameral system. The citizens would only have the need to vote for one house of representatives, as opposed to representatives of many states or regions, which don’t apply to your country. As representatives of Turkey, one of the aspects of our government we are most proud of is our unicameral system. We are confident this system will benefit Xlandia as much as it has benefited us. Other countries like the U.S. follows a federal system which divides the congress into a senate and House of Representatives. But, we feel one house would be most efficient and beneficial for your new government system. A unicameral system passes laws faster and has more accountability since there is no opposing

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Conception Of Democracy

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Some aspects when applied to current issues and the government are democratic, while others are not. When it comes to the electoral college we don’t get to vote directly for our president, instead we vote for electors. These electors in turn cast votes, but these are not always representative of what the population wants. The main issue here is how can this election be fair if you are not truly voting for the president? While in that aspect it can be undemocratic it can also be democratic.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Representation and its Purpose Nicholas Mickulin nicholas.mickulin@gmail.com October 3rd, 2014. The concept of a representative government was meant to be as representational as possible. The idea of a representative government is to filter the opinion of the masses by electing a small elite to run the country. This idea of government is actually contradictory because a representative government never represents everyone in the populace. In a representative government, representatives can only represent the majority that elected them.…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A few years after the United States was founded, the Constitutional Convention met to decide how the nation would be governed. They decided that they needed a leader to govern the nation. Based on experiences, the delegates knew that they needed find someone who was not a tyrant and did not abuse their power. The delegates did not believe that the president should be chosen by popular vote. They did not contemplate that voters would be perspicacious enough to make a worthy choice in choosing the president.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Electing the president is not based on the citizen’s votes. Are votes as the people are just to give the electors an idea of what the citizens of that state want. Then they don’t have to pay attention to those votes. This topic is controversial because it is proposing equality vs. order. George C. Edwards III thinks we should…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Is parliamentarism more democratic than presidentialism? Democratic governments can be organized mainly in three different ways: Parliamentarism, presidentialism and semi-presidentialism. We will focus on the differences between parliamentary and presidential systems, explaining their main characteristics and claiming that parliamentarism is more democratic because of the executive constraints that it has. One of the defining feature of presidentialism is the lack of “legislative responsibility”, it means that the government acts according to the will of the President, not to the legislature assembly. Therefore, governments in presidential systems do not have the need of preserve the majority legislative support in order to stay in office and it can lead into more autocratic attitudes.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Similar to other democratic nations, The United States has the Constitution to help protect citizens and their rights. However, the reason they are reluctant to ratify treaties is due to Article II and VI. These two articles are written in a way that make ratifying treaties difficult and unappealing. Article II is written so that the President can only make Treaties with the consent of two-thirds of the Senate. Similarly, Article VI would cause treaties to trump national law, giving them the same status of power as the Constitution (U.S constitution).…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When it comes down to it, representative democracy is more efficient the possibility of this form of government falling apart compared to direct democracy is very small. Most important, one does not have to worry about their citizens education in a certain field compared to a direct democracy. Thus reducing the possibility of citizens voting of laws that will cause harm in the future. To quote President Bush, “Think about every problem, every challenge, we face. The solution to each starts with…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In a direct democracy, there is only one degree of separation between the masses’ votes and the government’s policy changes since they directly vote on the policy. In an indirect democracy where the masses elect officials to vote on policy, there are two degrees of separation. As mentioned earlier, this kind of democracy can be less democratic since the interests of the elected official may not always match the interests of the masses. We can take this farther to further show the disconnection between the masses’ interests and the policy changes. We could have an indirect democracy where the masses elect officials at the state level and those officials elect other officials to represent the state officials at the national level so that there’s three degrees of separation between the masses’ interests and policy changes.…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Not only that, but this weakens the participation that the citizens get to have in the government itself. One of the main ideas that our founding fathers based the Constitution on was to give the people more power and say in what happens in order to balance the power more efficiently and prevent tyranny. This whole process of the people not getting to pick the judges overrides that idea. The President already has enough power, giving them this power could potentially cause a mess within the cabinet. It makes it easier for the President to do illegal activity because he could choose who was below…

    • 1094 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Two-party system advocators mainly focus on how stable the government is when compared to multi-party systems. “The two-party system is said to promote governmental stability because a single party can win a majority in the parliament and govern.” This is true, however, it will not allow change. The United States should keep its values and ideas. However, there comes a time when change to policies is essential. With party polarization, compromise will not allow for change to fix problems.…

    • 2380 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Decent Essays