Wrongful Possession of Drugs: The CID memorandum states that the MP found what they suspected to be a bottle of liquid steroids in the wall locker of the SM. Further investigation determined that the liquid was drostanolone propionate, an anabolic/androgenic steroid, which was confirmed by the CID laboratory. The DA 4833 states that the SM recieved an Art. 15, but did not specify as to the SM's punishment. Upon further review of the SM's file no Art. 15 is currently on record in his OMPF.
Wrongful Use of a Controlled Substance (Ecstasy): The CID memorandum states that the SM tested positive for Ecstasy during a command directed urinalysis. The DA 4833 states that the SM received an Art. 15 with a forfeiture monthly of $530.00 for two months, reduction to PV2, and 45 days extra duty and restriction. …show more content…
The SM was apprehended and waived his rights and provided a written statement denying the offense. There is no evidence of any actions taken at command level present in the information provided by screening agencies. (This incident took place 5 months after the pervious offense).
Wrongful Use of Marihuana; Wrongful Possession of Marihuana: The CID memorandum states that the SM observed two Soldier's purchasing and distribute an undetermined amount of marihuana from. Nowhere within the report does it mention anything about the SM using marihuana. The DA 4833 states that both the SM and the previous commander's had PCS'd. Contact was made with the two company commander's but they could not recall the outcome of the events pertaining to this incident. There is no evidence of any actions taken at command level present in the information provided by screening
Wrongful Use of a Controlled Substance (Ecstasy): The CID memorandum states that the SM tested positive for Ecstasy during a command directed urinalysis. The DA 4833 states that the SM received an Art. 15 with a forfeiture monthly of $530.00 for two months, reduction to PV2, and 45 days extra duty and restriction. …show more content…
The SM was apprehended and waived his rights and provided a written statement denying the offense. There is no evidence of any actions taken at command level present in the information provided by screening agencies. (This incident took place 5 months after the pervious offense).
Wrongful Use of Marihuana; Wrongful Possession of Marihuana: The CID memorandum states that the SM observed two Soldier's purchasing and distribute an undetermined amount of marihuana from. Nowhere within the report does it mention anything about the SM using marihuana. The DA 4833 states that both the SM and the previous commander's had PCS'd. Contact was made with the two company commander's but they could not recall the outcome of the events pertaining to this incident. There is no evidence of any actions taken at command level present in the information provided by screening