Scholarly writing and academic papers should have an informed argument to present to the reader. To do this, one must separate what is known about a topic and what one’s views are about that same topic. If a paper fails to inform, or argue, then it fails to meet expectations of a scholarly reader. To create an informed argument, one must first recognize that one’s writing should be analytical while the personal aspects should involve a seamless transition with the analytical thought. Personal aspects should blend in and not override analytical, but lend to …show more content…
An appropriate and beneficial question to ask would be, what is known about my topic by other readers and students? A student must be able to have solid and precise answers to several questions that range from can they answer the questions who, when, what, where, how, and why to what do they know about the topic that might help their reader understand it in a different way? One might discover that while they are considering these questions, they are being transported beyond what is known about a topic and beginning to consider what one thinks. In this process, one’s goal is to conjure up a fresh observation because it is not enough to just summarize information about subjects that are already known and talked about into a paper. One must add something of their own to the conversation, but they need to keep in mind that “adding something of their own” is not an invitation to bring their own personal associations, reactions, or experiences to the paper in order to change the context. The writer must take special care to be objective about the subject and not add bias to their