• P alleges excessive force and false arrest. P alleges that he was walking on the sidewalk when MOS Rubin and Sgt. Calhoun approached him. P claims that MOS Rubin and Sgt. Calhoun grabbed him, threw him to the ground, and then banged his head into the sidewalk.…
to not make a UDPTA claim.” Wilson v. Blue Ridge Elec. Mbrshp. Corp., 157 N.C. App. 355, 578 S.E.2d 692 (2003). Dr. Stout was an employee of the Practice and therefore cannot claim the Practice violated the UDPTA. To the extent liability against Health Management and the Hospital is derivative on Dr. Stout’s employment at the Practice, those claims are also barred.…
Argument In the case of Swidler and Berlin v. United States, the government issued a subpoena to obtain the handwritten notes of attorney Hamilton that had been written during a meeting with his client, Vincent Foster. A few days later the client, Foster, committed suicide. The argument of the United States government was that because the client was deceased they could legally obtain the notes disregarding the attorney – client privilege.…
Case Study Template **These are only guidelines and will vary case by case Title: US. vs Byron Mitchell What: Byron’s fingerprints were found on a getaway car used after an armed robbery. The fingerprints were later proven invalid.…
Oyinkansola Lapite January 28th 2016 MFC 483 Case Title and Citation: United States of America v.Juan Manuel Contento-Pachon, 723 F.2d 691 Relevant Case Facts: The defendant Juan Manuel Pachon received a job offered from one of his passenger named Jorge to be a driver of a privately own car. Pachon expressed an interest in the job and decided to meet both Jorge and the owner of the car. The next day Jorge proposed that Pachon swallowed cocaine and transport to the United States, and that if he mentioned the proposition to anyone he would get in trouble. A week later Pachon told Jorge he would not be transporting the drugs. Jorge replied to Pachon by mentioned important and personal…
In 1977 Fusilier v. Russell dealt with intoxicated drivers and the police failure to arrest. The plaintiff brought criminal action against two Louisiana Sheriffs for failure to arrest or restrain an intoxicated driver. The subject had later become involved in a motor vehicle accident that left the victim/plaintiff severely burned. Prior to the accident deputy sheriffs were responding to a call from a nightclub where they were to evict a disorderly customer. When the officers arrived they noticed an intoxicated person in the parking lot.…
Bernard (Bernie) Douglas Banton was an Australian advocate for people suffering from asbestos associated diseases and social injustice, the campaigner was born in Sydney on the 13th of October in 1946, he had begun his profession at James Hardie & Co Pty Ltd From 1968 to 1974. James Hardie is an industrial building materials corporation headquartered in Dublin, Ireland. The company specializes in the manufacturing and shipping of fibre cement products and develops materials for the production of a variety of building materials. Banton had worked as a bathe operator, shaping blocks of asbestos for use in power stations and making asbestos pipe sections. He was widely embraced as the face of legal and political campaign to achieve compensation…
Argument 1. The judgement for Appellee should be affirmed because the Appellant’s mother had apparent authority to consent to the search of the shoebox. Appellant’s mother, Ms. Fallsbauer, demonstrated apparent authority to consent to the search of the shoebox when she stated her prior ownership of the shoebox. (R. at 5.)…
Packard v. Packard 18 January 1864, the jury reached its verdict. “We, the undersigned, Jurors in the case of Mrs. Elizabeth P. W. Packard, alleged to be insane, having heard the evidence… are satisfied that she is sane.” Judge Starr ordered, “… that Mrs. Elizabeth P. W. Packard be relieved of all restraints incompatible with her condition as a sane woman.” (Packard v. Packard, pg. 40)…
The Engel v. Vital case in 1962 was a time when controversy began . The State was in favor of banning school prayers in public schools. This ruling clearly clarified the concept regarding school prayers. Whereas, first Amendment allows students to freely express them through religious perspective. The students have right to pray, converse or even share their religions with other students but not during school related activities.…
In early September, Twenty-First Century Fox settled with past host of a news show on Fox New, Gretchen Carlson, for sexual harassment. She was awarded twenty million dollars for her being a victim of long time CEO Roger Ailes. Roger Ailes was eventually fired from running the Fox News company. In her lawsuit, Carlson said her contract wasn 't renewed after she “refused to sleep” with Ailes and reported "severe and pervasive sexual harassment” at her workplace. (Yu, 2016)…
The Supreme Court case United States v. Seeger stemmed from an issue within Section 6 (j) of the Universal Military Training and Service Act of 1958. In Section 6 (j) an exemption was offered for conscientious objectors from military service. Their belief of a “Supreme Being” had to be parallel to that of a person believing in a god and fulfilling their duties to that god. Daniel Seeger held a sincere belief that war would damage his soul for having to kill other men. Instead of claiming belief in a Supreme Being, Seeger cited philosophers such as Plato, and Aristotle.…
Bob Ewell decided to hold the trial because he knew that he would win due to his skin color. In the 1930s, no colored person ever won a case and Tom Robinson was not going to be an exception. From my interpretation of the case it seems that Bob might have even thought that the town would appreciate him more for ‘saving them from a colored rapist’. At the end of chapter 26, Scout says that “Tom was a dead man the minute Mayella Ewell opened her mouth and screamed.” (Lee, 1960, pg.…
The culprit wasn’t the Ewells or the Cunninghams, not directly anyway. In all honesty, ignorance was the most liable of them all, and the furthest from being prosecuted. Undeniably, the Ewells created the most chaos for…
Question 1: Who is hurt and who benefits from the manipulation of LIBOR? I would say that the banks are because of the shortage of regulation from the government in partnership with the banks, shoppers and economies globally square measure hurt by the LIBOR scandal. Attributable to the speed manipulation, banks in numerous countries borrowed capital from lenders at rates higher or not up to a number of their competitors. The result was passed on to shoppers in those countries United Nations agency hold accounts or potential accounts with those banks. The shoppers were ready or unable to borrow a lot of or less funding from the banks, which might possible are accustomed open businesses, purchases homes and cars.…