Was World War 1 A War Instigated By Fear

Superior Essays
The debate whether World War One was a war instigated by fear or rather a war for motives of gain, has been a debate long fought by historians. Most historians however agree that World War One was caused by the tensions between the European powers and crisis of the balance-of-power system which divided Europe into two armed and completely opposed groups. Furthermore, based on historical evidence and the events leading up to World War One, it can be said that it was a war not only fought due to fear, but also a war fought for the motives of gain.

In the build up to World War One, many momentous events occurred however no single event can be pinpointed as the official start of the war, but instead these events can be seen to have a domino effect
…show more content…
German Historian, Fritz Fischer even claimed that Germany alone was responsible for starting the war. Many historians provide evidence supporting this claim however none explicitly claim that Germany was solely responsible, and as Douglas Hurd claims, German actions are seen as a defensive effort to mitigate Britain’s naval and territorial superiority, and as a way to solve Germany’s internal problems. Since the late 1890s tensions between Germany and Britain continued to grow, with Britain fearing that Germany may rise to dominate the continent, disrupting the balance of power. This fear was evident at during the Spanish-American War of 1898, when Germany sought to limit the extent of US victory by raising a united European front against the US in support of Spain. However, this German initiative failed as the British refused to take part in the diplomatic initiate and chose to support the US, which began to add to the tensions. Later in 1902, these tensions were again displayed, during the Venezuelan Crisis. During this event, Britain, Germany and Italy sent a combined naval squadron to enforce a blockade of the South American republic over debts, however this caused tensions with the US, with the US condemning their actions. Germany was prepared to fight over this, however Britain promptly recalled its forces leaving Germany to fight alone. Soon Germany was forced to retire, and abandoned its goal to seek closer relations with Britain. Instead, Germany went on to develop a naval building program- the program that Britain grew to fear most. However, this plan proved to cause more fear in Germany as it had failed and in turn pushed Britain into closer relationships with Japan, France, Russia and the US. (Christopher Ray) Thus, war at the time was seen to be inevitable

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The United States’ decision to enter World War I was initially met with negative public opinion. The sheer diversity of the U.S. population made it impossible to support the effort. President Woodrow Wilson, who also wanted to be “neutral in fact as well as in name”, originally hoped to influence the postwar arrangements between the belligerents. However, he was compelled by German attacks on American people and the country’s integrity, leading him to ask Congress for a declaration of war against Germany. The Germans had dishonored previous agreements and they had provoked the United States with threats to take away land the country had rightfully gained.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Since the Treaty was enforced by nuclear powers in our scenario, and rational leaders would be deterred by this fact before violating the Treaty. However, due to Hitler’s ambition for empire, he can be categorized as an irrational leader, so I don’t believe he would be deterred by nuclear weapons. For Hitler, undoing the Treaty was the first step in accomplishing his desire for empire. Besides, at a times when Germany started violating the Treaty, countries worldwide were suffering from Great Depression, France and Britain were still recovering from WWI. From Hitler’s point of view, the French and British were too weak to enforce the Treaty.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although in some ways Germany played a minor role in causing World War I because Germany was pressured into WWI to honor its alliances, Germany should be blamed for the war to a great extent because Germany played a crucial role in establishing the alliance system, increased tensions and anticipation of war throughout Europe through its militaristic practices, and increased the size of World War I with its aggressive use of military strategy and new weapons. While some have maintained that Germany was not at fault for World War I since Germany joined the war because of its obligation to help its allies, Germany should be blamed for World War I due to the country’s influential role in developing the alliance system in Europe. Prior to World…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Overy adds that the war was brought by not only Hitler alone, but by making instability in the international system. Some other causes for the war was the rise of nationalism, empire building and industrial power. The first World War was supposed to solve these issues but it didn’t work out so well. Britain and France had involved themselves in the war by rearranging Europe after their victory in the First World War. This first World War weakened the two, and they were weak in economic states and were faced by many states and other forces.…

    • 2220 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kaiser Wilhelm II, the emperor of Germany (1888-1918), significantly impacted not only the governance of his country, Germany, but ultimately influenced the rising tensions between rival nations on an international level. Kaiser’s authoritarian upbringing caused dysfunctional relationships within his family and his British monarchy. This led to his hatred toward Britain. His erratic nature may not personally have decided that Germany should go to war, however he had put into place the structures which fostered a culture of militarism and hence an aggressive foreign policy for the outbreak of war, particularly in ousting Bismarck. Wilhelm’s bellicose and expansionistic motives to achieve a ‘place in the sun’, overthrew Bismarck’s realpolitik…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The treaty of Versailles was created with the intention of weakening Germany. On one side some people considered that the treaty was unfair to Germany, as they weren’t the only country responsible for starting the war. On the other hand Germany caused a lot of damage, and people thought that Germany should be treaty harshly to prevent it from starting another war. The Treaty of Versailles was that was used to achieve each powers interest such as Germany’s navy being reduced so that it wouldn’t represent such a great threat to Germany, and Germany being weakened so France could have its revenge. The powers left the conference feeling that they weren’t able to create a treaty that would help keep the peace, and now a days historians blame the treaty of Versailles for helping cause World War 2.…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Madison Verschleiser Social Studies Hindsight is 20/20 The narrative of World War is one best explained by the phrase, “hindsight is 20/20”. Many countries entered World War Two believing it was in their national interest only for the end result to be significantly different than what they had expected. While the ideas of aggressive nationalism and militarism served as Germany and England’s national interest in the war, by entering the U.S hoped to have a say in the ultimate peace agreement at the end of the war, however in the end, despite Ally victory, no party achieved its goals. In Germany, the ideas of militarism and aggressive nationalism lead to Germany’s desire to expand its sphere of influence. When the war broke out Germany saw it as an easy win and opportunity to expand its sphere of influence while proving once and for all, that it was the strongest…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, since he raised such a powerful government, when he left, the country called for stronger leaders to rule Germany. Kaiser Wilhelm II’s foreign policy of Weltpolitik was practically the polar opposite of Bismarck’s Realpolitik for it was based on emotion and thus led to several bad decisions.Wilhelm put Germany into financial, social, and political distress by attempting to expand the navy and by declaring war and then becoming a figurehead for his generals. Kaiser Wilhelm II was significant to WWI because he caused several conflicts in it and led to the downfall of Germany during the war. All in all, Bismarck’s Realpolitik though less ambitious, was more cautious and led to the prosper of Germany unlike Wilhelm’s rash foreign policy which let to the downfall of Germany during WWI, however both leaders in…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    World War Dbq

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages

    President Roosevelt on the other hand had the bad luck of suffering a gigantic loss and damage to his naval forces before even being able to enter the war. President Wilson had kept a neutral status but remained in trade with both sides, but favored one side heavily. This frustrated the Germans and probably caused the retaliation of the U-boat incident. Roosevelt on the other hand had not traded with the Axis side and put into play a lend-lease act for allied forces. As not being able to enter the war Roosevelt lent supply aid in efforts to help.…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He had wanted Germany to lose its navy and its colonies - the powerful navy threatened the British Empire. Regarding the victors’ point of view, it should be noted once more that if the treaty had requested exactly what France and Britain had wanted out of it in the first place Germany would have not recovered. Another factor to consider is whether or not the treaty was seen as justified at the time. The way Germany had treated Russia in the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk in 1918 was very severe and the Treaty of Versailles was more justified and fair. This caused many to consider Germany as operating on double standards and consequently, much less felt sympathy.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays