OPTION 1: Push the first item despite the fact that it was not even best answer for the customer.
It is said that this method would keep up the vital relationship Jeffrey as of now had with that architect yet the new customer was not fulfilled by the present item, so the organization's infamy was at danger in the event that it offered an item although it was known that the item was not totally in accordance with the customer's needs.
According to my point of view, the first option is not recommended as it was that company will push the existing product but although it was not even required by the customer. We cannot just choose this option just because architect is happy with this existing product. It should be kept in mind that Jeffrey should …show more content…
In the event that it succeeded Jeffrey may considerably facilitate support the architect's trust in Woodtronics to convey the best answers for his different customers not far off. In any case, the architect was determined to utilizing the time tested item. A genuine danger he would leave Woodtronics and discover a contender that disagreed to test a new item with one of existing customers. I would recommend this option to choose as this will be most beneficial for company.
Conclusion:
In the conclusion it is said that Option 2 was picked by Jeffrey and went specifically to the customer with a false up of the new evolution stage. He had not informed the architect that he himself had ended this till the time he was certain that the customer was totally satisfied by the new option. Woodtronics got improved the sale, besides, customer chose to buy the new item within the time period of a week of having seen the demo. So my option is 3 which will be chosen and helpful in meeting the sales to high level. It will also be helpful in attracting the new customers and also can maintain the relations with the existing
It is said that this method would keep up the vital relationship Jeffrey as of now had with that architect yet the new customer was not fulfilled by the present item, so the organization's infamy was at danger in the event that it offered an item although it was known that the item was not totally in accordance with the customer's needs.
According to my point of view, the first option is not recommended as it was that company will push the existing product but although it was not even required by the customer. We cannot just choose this option just because architect is happy with this existing product. It should be kept in mind that Jeffrey should …show more content…
In the event that it succeeded Jeffrey may considerably facilitate support the architect's trust in Woodtronics to convey the best answers for his different customers not far off. In any case, the architect was determined to utilizing the time tested item. A genuine danger he would leave Woodtronics and discover a contender that disagreed to test a new item with one of existing customers. I would recommend this option to choose as this will be most beneficial for company.
Conclusion:
In the conclusion it is said that Option 2 was picked by Jeffrey and went specifically to the customer with a false up of the new evolution stage. He had not informed the architect that he himself had ended this till the time he was certain that the customer was totally satisfied by the new option. Woodtronics got improved the sale, besides, customer chose to buy the new item within the time period of a week of having seen the demo. So my option is 3 which will be chosen and helpful in meeting the sales to high level. It will also be helpful in attracting the new customers and also can maintain the relations with the existing