Woodrow Wilson's Argument That Executive Branch Should Hold The Majority Of Power

Improved Essays
Woodrow Wilson’s essay arguing against Congressional authority exemplifies the belief that Executive Branch should hold the majority of power. The author first notes that the existence of committees within the Legislative Branch is a monumental hindrance to the progress of the nation, and the way in which it conducts trade. Likewise, he contends that the fact that the federal government is so divided in its ability to execute decisions, considering the three branch system, that the country’s progress is interfered with. Furthermore, the writer calls for one arm to be trusted over the others, as the people need a sole entity that can be followed, and later blamed. The aforementioned concepts almost entirely go against the intentions of the Framers

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    One major constitutional relationship that is defined deeply within the author’s argument is the distinct power of U.S foreign policy and whether or not the president or congress should have the ability to declare war (48). Ultimately when the framers constructed the constitution, it named the president the “ commander-in-chief”, however the power to declare war was only available to congress (50). Eventually this struggle among the branches led to the future outcry of who should deal with U.S foreign policy. Also over time presidents began to exert their “ commander-in-chief” duties by sending troops to where they felt necessary and even began wars only to justify that they did so with nation’s interest in mind, all without congressional approval…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the essay Federalist No. 69, Alexander Hamilton addresses the people off New York, and requests that the president would be a selective ruler he outlines what the presidents powers should be. His introduction was very strong and made the reader want to hear his points. Alexander Hamilton discusses the character of the executive branch by comparison to the king of Great Britain and state governors. He introduced to the reader that the president would be elected for a term of four years; he would be suitable for re-election, and would not have the life tenure of a traditional ruler. The president would be liable to impeachment, trial, and removal from office upon being found guilty of disloyalty, subornation, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Madison and Alexis de Tocqueville are both giants in American political theory and both have deliberated extensively on the tyranny of the majority in democratic societies. Since both are from different eras, the way each of them talk about the problem is framed in different terms and different contexts. Madison offers a solution to a perceived problem, and Tocqueville observes and critiques the solution. In the many Federalist Papers Madison published on the issue, there is one solution that is most conductive to reducing the powers of the tyranny of the majority, and this is solution is the checks and balances between the separate branches of government and between the federal and state governments. Tocqueville’s assessment of this attempted restraint is poor, he sees the government as becoming increasingly centralized in power and state and local governments losing their prestige and influence.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wilson’s blunder Like Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson is one of the best presidents who just served at a bad time as claimed by Kendrick A. Clements, a historian formerly at the University of South Carolina. Clements praises the Wilson administration for its foreign policies and helping America emerge as a world power. Jim Powell of the Cato Institute, on the other hand has a different opinion. According to Powell, Wilson is the worst president in American history. He says, in his need to join the League of Nations, Wilson refused to see that the members of the League would only comprise of winners and their allies of war, which he said would prevent future wars.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The emotional and dramatic debates of 1787 initiated an event turning change in the structure of the United States government. The passion of James Madison’s ambition to create an equally powered federal government through the division of government branches have set foot to what the modernized American system is seen today. Rakove elaborates in great detail of the trials and errors which the delegates of the 1787 Convention had to endure. However, without the strenuous debates, contemplating opinions, and theoretical views of the Virginia Plan delegates against the New Jersey Plan delegates, the American nation would fail to stand on the strong values of equal government power. From the various attempts to create an organized federal government power and Constitution, the intentions of the delegates of the 1787 Convention were centered upon the values of theory and philosophy rather than…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Critics of the president’s power express their discontent at the president gaining power at the expense of Congress. Due to the vagueness of the powers outlined in the Constitution, many fear that the president can just run rampant and do as he wishes. When looking at the overall positives versus the negatives, the benefits of a strong presidency, namely unification of a country under an individual elected by the nation as a whole out, help rather than hinder our…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The similarities of federalism and parliamentary sovereignty in the U.S. and Britain are founded on the power of the legislative body to the representational and territorial facts of democratic institutions. More so, the ability of the U.S. federal government as a “checks and balances” system provides a similar use of parliamentary power in the Congress. However, the U.S. relies more heavily on a tri-parte system of legislative government, which allows a certain concentration of war powers through presidentialism. These factors define the overarching power of the American presidency, which makes the president and the Congress accountable for their actions. In a contrasting way, the British parliament does not allow the same powers to the Prime Minister or The Queen as means of accountability in the governing process.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    constitution, led by Hamilton and Madison, set the stage for a self-governing America. “No one planned the process that produced America’s Constitution”, but it all started in September of 1780 when “Hamilton was the first to conclude that a new government was needed”, even before the Articles of Confederation took effect and called for congress “to revise the Articles”. Calling upon congress to come together and agree was a difficult and long process. Hamilton was always ready for a national convention, yet Madison “was not ready for that drastic step”, but “after the Mount Vernon conference and a trip to New York and Philadelphia, Madison warmed to the idea of a national convention”. The Articles of Confederation needed to be revised, “the weakness of the national government afflicted everyday life” from not having a uniform currency to voting in congress and the complex almost-non existing tax system.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The senate as a possible remedy can, impeach the president. The constitution in Article 1 section 3 states: “The Senate will have the sole Power to try all impeachments. When sitting for that purpose, they shall be on oath or Affirmation. When the president of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no person hall be convicted without the concurrence of two thirds of the members present” (pg.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He speculated that such factions might have the ability to gain enough power to obstruct the execution of laws created by Congress and to prevent the branches of government from functioning as they are designed to by the Constitution. Additionally, he expressed concern that as one party gained ultimate temporary control of the government, they would use it to undermine the powers of the other, forming a vicious cycle of revenge. One could consider these warnings from our first president as astonishingly prophetic, almost paralleling the shortcomings of the modern party system in our nation’s politics. It doesn’t take much searching to find evidence of government shut-downs and policies aimed specifically at subverting opposing parties in the recent history of American…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Well before the 20th century, Congress was in charge of the federal government. Only a handful of times did the president actually make decisions or have involvement in the process. Earlier, in the formation of the United States, the president was easily considered “chief clerk”. The increased importance of foreign policy, helped to develop the presidential powers of the 20th century. Since then, the president of the United States of America has grown to become the most powerful position our nation.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America’s long journey of seeking freedom from governmental oppression, the newly formed nation was skeptical when it came to the discussion of new government authority. Many Americans were still uneasy about consolidated power, while others were aware of the prevalent national instability caused by the lack thereof. Though, in the end, the Constitution prevailed and has become the cornerstone of American government, the path that led to this enduring document was gradual and filled with apprehension and debate. Both sides of the issue had very clear and valid notions about either their support or opposition to the Constitution, and in the end were able to find common ground through patience and compromise.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The design of two houses making up Congress allows the wants of the people to never be settled, because neither side can reach an agreement. The founding fathers’ intentions for Congress to be a government in which the people are represented and heard clearly failed due to the never-ending cycle of The Washington Establishment, the most prominent evidence of a broken government. No government is perfect; however, America should set an example to other countries as one with a government that truly represents its constituents, not as one with a broken…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Understanding the relationship between the president and congress is key in understanding American politics. Congress and the president cannot avoid engaging with one another, with a constitutional set up that demands they work together constructively. Congress has its roles to play in policy making as does the president. The president and congress are given certain powers in the constitution, that power is divvied up, so that neither one of these branches has too much power at one time (Fisher 2007). The founders of the constitution were very distrustful of the presidency and feared if the president was given too much power it would lead to demagogy (Dickinson 2008).…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Legislative Branch and the Executive Branch are both part of the three branches that where put into place to separate power. Also known as separation of powers. Both of these branches has specific powers that they can each do. The Legislative Branch is made up of the House of Representatives and the Senate.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays