Women Vs Nuclear Energy

Improved Essays
The energy crisis seems to be a common topic for newsstands and debates all over. Due to the imminent loss of fossil fuels, it is imperative that a solution be found. Many believe that nuclear energy could be our ticket out of this crisis. These people believe that if France can produce 76.9% of its energy from nuclear reactors, the world could easily depend on nuclear energy (“World Statistics”). Two organizations, the Nuclear Energy Institute and Women in Nuclear, argue that development of the nuclear energy industry could be beneficial to all. However, the two have very different takes on how it could be beneficial. While Women in Nuclear sees the nuclear energy industry as a platform for female empowerment, the Nuclear Energy Institute …show more content…
To create the company in 1994, many already-established nuclear power organizations united. Today, NEI is a result of the consolidation of the American Nuclear Energy Council, the US Council for Energy Awareness, the nuclear division of the Edison Electric Institute, and the Nuclear Utility Management and Resource Center. Some of these organizations have a history spanning over 60 years in the nuclear industry (“About NEI”). The Nuclear Energy Institute asserts that nuclear energy is beneficial, that it can help us out of the growing energy crisis. They believe that nuclear energy can be a reliable and affordable choice, while creating jobs and fostering economic growth. They claim that for every dollar spent in the nuclear industry, it makes $1.04 at the local level, $1.18 at the state level, and $1.87 at the national level (“About …show more content…
This summit would most likely take place in the United States, as the Nuclear Energy Institute is not international. Whereas Women in Nuclear would draw in people who are advocates for gender equality in the nuclear industry, the Nuclear Energy Institute would appeal more to the politicians and business men or women. This summit would take these two seemingly different groups of people, and place them on common ground. Some of the proposed topics to be discussed at the summit would include: how nuclear energy can empower women and youth, why nuclear energy is the clear answer to the energy crisis, what you can do to push nuclear energy, and how the nuclear industry could help the environment and the economy at the same time. It might be in the best interest of both companies if they also included an open forum for people to ask questions directed towards the presidents of both groups, who would be in attendance. This would allow the visitors to voice any questions they had about the organizations and what they each bring to the table. Another aspect of the summit could be educating people on how nuclear energy has been implemented in other countries around the world, and how it has turned out for them. This would allow people to see real results based on different levels of nuclear integration in different

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Nuclear power has a lot of benefits, especially towards the environment. For example, in Document A, it states that “nuclear power production releases no pollutants into the air.” Meaning that while the nuclear power plant is giving out energy for us, it’s not harming the environment. This is important because since it's not releasing any air pollutants, then its not releasing any greenhouse gasses, the earth’s temperature is going to decrease. It's a win win for both the humanity and Earth.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One statistic that stands out in the article is: “at the end of 2007 the world had 439 operating nuclear reactors producing 372 gigawatts of electricity” (Stieglitz and Docksai 20). This article provides readers with enough information in regards to nuclear power…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How fear of nuclear power is hurting the environment, is a title that would spike anyone’s curiosity. In 13 minutes and 58 seconds, Michael Shellenberger crafts an argument about how the fear of nuclear energy is unfounded and nuclear energy should be the go to clean energy of the world. Shellenberger starts off his TED talk by claiming to viewers that we are in the middle of a clean energy revolution. He backs this up through empirical evidence in his home state of California and through the examples of Germany, who gets half of their power through solar energy, and India who has promised to expand their energy from solar to that of 10 times California output. He also cites bill gates working in china with their engineers and those of MIT…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The generation of electricity through nuclear energy reduces the amount of energy generated from fossil fuels such as coal and oil. Meaning that it is lowering the greenhouse gas emissions such as CO2 due to the use of less fossil fuels.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear power is one of the cheapest forms of energy compared to other sources such as oil and coal. According to studies done by professor Nolan E, Hertel, professor of Nuclear and Radiological Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology, the cost of producing nuclear energy as of 2007 was 1.7 cents per kilowatt hour compared to 2.4 cents for coal, 6.7 cents for natural gas, and 10.2 cents for oil. However does this affordability come at a cost? According to Max Schulz at the center for Energy Policy and the Environment at the Manhattan Institute, there has not been a single accident or fatality involving exposure or harm at a nuclear power plant since the start of their operations in the United States (MI). When compared to the average of 200 accidental deaths per year at coal and natural gas powered plants, not including respiratory issues, its record is impeccable (Lehr).…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Energy Proposal

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages

    My third source was a link found on the bottom page of my second source; the third source was a joint report between the Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency. It gives a complete analysis of uranium such as the supply, demand and even national reports on the resources, production and exploration of uranium in different countries. This information will be utilized in the aspect of statistics on which countries use nuclear power and which do not. At this point in my research I needed to changed my search criteria from the positives of nuclear energy, and alternative fuel for the plants to the cost of building and running a nuclear plant. This change in search criteria led me to my fourth source, which was written by Ian Schultz.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each power plant that is producing nuclear energy can run full on 24/7 and only have to cut off once a year to refuel, meaning this energy will be reliable all the time. Not only does nuclear energy help our country environmentally but it will also help economically. A nuclear energy facility can bring in almost five hundred million dollars in sales. Yearly a nuclear power plant could bring in about seventy million dollars in revenue for taxes federally.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though there are benefits of nuclear power there are also an abundance of issues. These issues include the stability of the reactors, the rigorous process workers take to dispose of waste, the possibility that in the near future scientist will be able to redirect the fuel cycle into more nuclear weapons, and the cost to run these…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Regardless of the various definitions of renewable energy, nuclear energy meets every reasonable criterion for sustainability, which is the primary concern of countries. The United States should use nuclear energy for three primary reasons: first, it produces more cost effective energy than any other non-renewable resource. Second there is no release of greenhouse gasses which contribute to global warming, and finally nuclear energy is the most reliable source of power in the world today. Nuclear power produces electricity that is less expensive than coal and natural gas while providing more energy for use. The Energy Informative Organization supports this claim when the author states, “Generating electricity in nuclear reactors is cheaper…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear Energy Controversy

    • 1506 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In December 20, 1951, the first nuclear reactor produces electric power at the Experimental Breeder Reactor I in Arco Idaho. On December 8, 1953, President Eisenhower gives his speech, “Atoms for Peace” to the United Nations and promotes the progress for peaceful purposes of nuclear energy. On December 2, 1957, in Shippingport, Pennsylvania, the world’s first large-scale nuclear power plant launches into operation and supplies electricity to the Pittsburgh area. Furthermore, on May 22,…

    • 1506 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The documentary that was first shown in 2013 and is approximately 83 minutes long, does an excellent job of creating a debate about the perception of nuclear energy in challenging global climate change during the 21st century. This documentary film's main argument is that nuclear power, yet contradicted by many environmentalists, is a relatively safe and harmless source of energy if compared to other energy sources and can counteract…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They call themselves anti-nuclear activists, and most stand in firm resolution that nuclear power is not safe for the environment, humans, animals, or even plants. According to author of “Nuclear Power is Not The Answer” Helen Caldicott, It isn’t safe for workers, miners, or residents who work or live in the vicinity of nuclear power plants. She says that the exposure causes the increased risk of cancer, and other diseases. The results of switching to Nuclear Power would be catastrophic because in order for nuclear power to operate, it needs to release more radioactive materials into the air, water, and soil.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear Energy Effects

    • 2413 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Nuclear power can have very damaging effects to people and to the environment. However, in order to keep funding this alternate source of energy, what needs to be changed? Nuclear energy has a very high potential to generate massive amounts of power that can be provided to communities. It generates so much energy, that sometimes these community power plants can have dangerous meltdowns. These meltdowns, can cause catastrophic malfunctions damage to people and the environment.…

    • 2413 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The overall conclusion is that when the public is informed about the massive reduction of CO2 emissions and nuclear waste disposal is not a factor for support, the opinion for this type of energy increases dramatically; thus, the researchers state that policy makers need to work in conjunction with the nuclear energy producers to start campaigns of educating people. However, the research warns that if the government were to spearhead such a campaign, it would end more likely than not in failure due to a lack of trust in the government. This data will serve to show that general opinion can be swayed by promoting nuclear power. However, this promotional effort should be led not by the government, but by a research firm or science agency (The source claims that the government’s reliability rating is next to nothing; a science agency has much more dependability in the public’s eye).This can be compared with a possible general survey in Daytona Beach of what residents think about the subject to…

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of nuclear power has been under debate for many years; with issues such as environmental impact, safety, cost, waste management, and efficiency, the cons clearly outweigh the pros. Nuclear power plants have been supplying electricity to the population for nearly 60 years, but all things must come to an end as better options emerge and humanity develops as a species. It 's only natural for things to become outdated, or be replaced by better options as they become available. Nuclear power is a source of energy, created through a reaction when a uranium atom is split, releasing heat that is used to produce electricity. It was initially used as an alternative to coal, as coal-burning facilities were becoming a hazard to the environment.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays