While he believes that this story is showcasing the “collections of misdeeds done by women to men”, it actually reveals the privilege men have within marriages and highlights Simontault’s adverse perspective on women’s roles (14). Although the queen knew her husband was rumored to be cheating with a gentleman's wife while he was away, she also knew “she could not have honor and pleasure” and initially denies the gentleman(16). Despite her unfavorable circumstances, she remains rather calm and reasonable rather than seeking revenge on her cheating husband. Undeniably, this is a double standard because her husband can freely follow his desires without it impacting his reputation. Despite her initial reaction, both of these relationships become tangled and “the cheaters being cheated, four would share the pleasure, which two imagined they had all to themselves”(18). Simontault presents this dynamic as if now that everyone is unfaithful it is more acceptable. This contradicts the implications that women face in their reputations, unless both of these women willingly sacrificed their honor for pleasure. However, the concern for women’s honor seems unlikely considering that Simontault is trying to justify infidelity. After finishing his tale, he adds, “This, ladies...when your husband gives you horns you may do the same by them (19). Again, Simontault neglects that women do not wear horns like the men because they are not the same set of standards. Infidelity is only noteworthy when it’s a woman and that is what gives men their horns. Regardless, this immoral act does not even out if both parties are doing it, and Simontault is only trying to be like the first king in his story that breaks a marriage up. Simontault’s entitlement to share this story as his means of persuasion highlights how disconnected he is
While he believes that this story is showcasing the “collections of misdeeds done by women to men”, it actually reveals the privilege men have within marriages and highlights Simontault’s adverse perspective on women’s roles (14). Although the queen knew her husband was rumored to be cheating with a gentleman's wife while he was away, she also knew “she could not have honor and pleasure” and initially denies the gentleman(16). Despite her unfavorable circumstances, she remains rather calm and reasonable rather than seeking revenge on her cheating husband. Undeniably, this is a double standard because her husband can freely follow his desires without it impacting his reputation. Despite her initial reaction, both of these relationships become tangled and “the cheaters being cheated, four would share the pleasure, which two imagined they had all to themselves”(18). Simontault presents this dynamic as if now that everyone is unfaithful it is more acceptable. This contradicts the implications that women face in their reputations, unless both of these women willingly sacrificed their honor for pleasure. However, the concern for women’s honor seems unlikely considering that Simontault is trying to justify infidelity. After finishing his tale, he adds, “This, ladies...when your husband gives you horns you may do the same by them (19). Again, Simontault neglects that women do not wear horns like the men because they are not the same set of standards. Infidelity is only noteworthy when it’s a woman and that is what gives men their horns. Regardless, this immoral act does not even out if both parties are doing it, and Simontault is only trying to be like the first king in his story that breaks a marriage up. Simontault’s entitlement to share this story as his means of persuasion highlights how disconnected he is