Winning Hearts And Minds In War On Plagiarism Summary

Most initial drafts of papers contain numerous mistakes, which later on are made strides. The initial draft of the student composing on Scott Jaschik's article, "Winning Hearts and Minds in War on Plagiarism," contains many faults, which prevent the draft from reaching its full potential. The main basic error the student made was utilizing proper nouns excessively all through the starting draft. The student specifies and refers to the author commonly all through the entire draft. Despite the fact that it is right to refer back to the author, the student should have diminished the measure of times he included the authors name by just utilizing pronouns. Not only does this make the article sound smoother, it additionally makes the essay flow naturally. …show more content…
The student has the capacity to give strong arguments, supporting them with quotes from the text, but lacks in some point of interest when they are talking about the significance of the quote and the effect it has on the intended audience. In every supporting argument paragraph, the student does refer to the audience and purpose, but they lack in point of interest while clarifying how the rhetorical choice influences the audience and how it supports the purpose. The conclusion of the initial draft is fairly weak in point of interest, where the student refers to the intended audience and purpose but does not demonstrate a strong comprehension of what impacts the rhetorical choices had on them. The student also commits a mistake in the references, he just cite one reference, but he wrote works cited it means that there is not just one citation but more than