President Woodrow Wilson Argumentative Essay

Better Essays
The United States’ decision to enter World War I was initially met with negative public opinion. The sheer diversity of the U.S. population made it impossible to support the effort. President Woodrow Wilson, who also wanted to be “neutral in fact as well as in name”, originally hoped to influence the postwar arrangements between the belligerents. However, he was compelled by German attacks on American people and the country’s integrity, leading him to ask Congress for a declaration of war against Germany. The Germans had dishonored previous agreements and they had provoked the United States with threats to take away land the country had rightfully gained. Though the public was against the war, Wilson felt he needed to intervene in the war …show more content…
During the war, Britain imposed a naval blockade on the Central Powers in order to prevent important resources. Though this was seen as a violation of American neutrality, the economic benefits to this blockade increased American trade with the Allies fourfold. However, an effect of this trade relationship were the massive loans U.S. banks had given to the Allies, totaling almost 2.5 billion dollars. This set up economic warfare between Germany and America, in which Americans would favor the Allied Powers in terms of giving financial aid. Had the Allies lost, they would have defaulted on these loans, resulting in calamitous losses for American companies. As the president, Wilson was required to protect the industry and the livelihood of Americans, justifying his position on joining the war. Similar to the situation with unrestricted submarine warfare, the threat Germany posed to the economy also supported the cause for a world “safe for democracy”. First, since the Allied Powers were commercial allies, German control of the sea limited free commerce. Furthermore, the threat of a German victory, as previously stated, would result in the failed repayment of debts. Britain and France would not be able to pay back their debts while under German rule, which again violates the foundation of freedom in democracy. Wilson had to make sure that the large debt would be repaid, and a German victory would most certainly have quashed this necessity, justifying him involving America in the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Cause Of World War 2

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Only the United States had intentions of peace to not let this happen again. The rest had ulterior motives, the English wanted to hang the Kaiser the leader of Germany, the French wanted revenge for the Franco-Prussian War, the Italian wanted land from the Germans. At the end of treaty they took away German land the Soar Basin, made they pay reparation sfor whole war and they would end up crippled Germany. They crippled Germany so bad they would turn to anyone for an answer like Adolf Hitler, and would done anything like starting another world…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Clemenceau had enough of seeing damage being done to the land, industry, people, and the pride of France. At the end of the war many viewed Germany as a threat to national security; thus, they wanted Germany to be given a huge burden that they could not overcome easily. Clemenceau was a realist and was aware that not all of what he had wished for was going to be passed; nevertheless, he still viewed the treaty as ‘disappointing.’ The French President had even wanted Germany broken up into tiny states. Meanwhile, Lloyd George also wanted to punish Germany (as a mild treaty would not have been acceptable to the public), but not too harshly. He had wanted Germany to lose its navy and its colonies - the powerful navy threatened the British Empire.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kaiser Wilhelm II, the emperor of Germany (1888-1918), significantly impacted not only the governance of his country, Germany, but ultimately influenced the rising tensions between rival nations on an international level. Kaiser’s authoritarian upbringing caused dysfunctional relationships within his family and his British monarchy. This led to his hatred toward Britain. His erratic nature may not personally have decided that Germany should go to war, however he had put into place the structures which fostered a culture of militarism and hence an aggressive foreign policy for the outbreak of war, particularly in ousting Bismarck. Wilhelm’s bellicose and expansionistic motives to achieve a ‘place in the sun’, overthrew Bismarck’s realpolitik…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This committee instigated a wild “patriotic fervor” in the United States, which was accompanied by the strong discrimination of German-Americans. Wilson had unintentionally created the war among the country`s own population, that which he had intended to prevent by keeping the United States neutral. His initial anger and fervor for striking back at the Germans ignited an attitude in the American people that would create barriers against his ideas for peace later on. However, the increased patriotism in Americans did give the Allied Powers the support needed for to win the…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Also, these atrocities made Germany very vulnerable, and lead to the rise in power of Adolf Hitler. On the contrary, although the Treaty failed in many ways, some people believe that it was not responsible for World War II, and that the worldwide depression was the main factor. First of all, the treaty greatly offended Germany, and caused them to want revenge. The Treaty of Versailles was very offensive towards Germany, causing them to want a retaliation, which resulted with the start of World War II. The Treaty of Versailles,…

    • 1707 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Since the Treaty was enforced by nuclear powers in our scenario, and rational leaders would be deterred by this fact before violating the Treaty. However, due to Hitler’s ambition for empire, he can be categorized as an irrational leader, so I don’t believe he would be deterred by nuclear weapons. For Hitler, undoing the Treaty was the first step in accomplishing his desire for empire. Besides, at a times when Germany started violating the Treaty, countries worldwide were suffering from Great Depression, France and Britain were still recovering from WWI. From Hitler’s point of view, the French and British were too weak to enforce the Treaty.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    During the 1930s successive British governments adopted appeasement as their policy for dealing with Germany in the hope that it would prevent another war on the scale of the Great War. Pacifist attitudes among the British public was one reasons for this policy, however there were other reasons such as the fact that Britain implemented appeasement as Hitler’s demands appeared justifiable, the British military was not ready for war and Britain was lacking in reliable allies that would support them should war breakout. Finally, a fear of Communism spreading from Russia also prompted Britain’s policy of appeasement. This essay will argue that while pacifism did influence the government, it is more realistic to argue that it was these factors combined…

    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The incoming government, the Weimar Republic, was faced with the pressure of the treaty shortly after they were elected as the new German government. German delegates from the Weimar Republic stated, “The deeper we penetrated into the spirit of this Treaty, the more we became convinced of its impracticability. The demands raised go beyond the power of the German Nation....” (document I). The Germans thought that the treaty was overwhelming and unreachable. Although the delegates tried to reject the treaty, they signed it because it was better than going back to another war.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The problem was that the League could not agree with an action to stop Hitler also they did not see the threat of Hitler because he was just taking over country’s that had a large population of Germans. With this threat expanding west, France and Britain started to feel as if their national security was starting to be threatened.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He thought America’s involvement would only prolong the war and increase the destruction in Europe. The only advantage he noted to aiding the allies was that the United States would gain valuable time to build its defenses. He argued that sending war supplies to England, such as planes, strained America’s ability to defend itself. Lindbergh and The America First Committee, also, objected to the Lend-Lease Bill Congress was debating during this same period. (Source) One good point Lindbergh made was, if the nation intervened in Europe and the Pacific, it would create a need to protect supply lines and sea-lanes from Germany and Japan air attacks.…

    • 1261 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays