In the case of Williams vs Florida, Williams argued that his rights had been violated when the State of Florida did not let him use the fifth amendment as a reason to not give the name of witnesses that could corroborate his story as an alibi. He also said that the fact that he was getting a six-man jury rather than a 12-man jury, violated his constitutional rights. The jury ended up convicting him of robbery with a life sentence. His claims of violation of his right to a jury and right to not incriminate himself by providing an alibi, which would in turn give the state the opportunity to find a way to rebut his testimony, were rejected. There were majority and dissenting opinions. Justice Marshall dissented in part because he believed that
