William The Conqueror: A Hero Or Villain?

Great Essays
Throughout medieval times and throughout all of history, there have been many people who have caused much controversy regarding whether or not they are good or bad. William Ⅰ, or more commonly known as William the Conqueror, is one of these people. William did many things throughout his reign that may give people the difficult decision of whether or not to call him a hero or villain. Regardless, he did many things that shaped England as a whole and that are still able to be seen today. Although there are many actions that may depict William as a villain, he is mainly able to be seen as a hero due to the fact that he wrote the Domesday book, reorganized and strengthened the church, and organized law and order. William the Conqueror was born …show more content…
When it came time to chose the head positions of the church, he appointed well educated men. This provided many benefits due to the fact that because these men were educated, they were able to know what they were doing, which allowed them to lead the Norman church in a very strong way (John Simkin). Also, they were able to use their knowledge to educate those who were not educated (including those not involved with the church), which further strengthened the church, as well as overall society. Not only did they have advanced administrative skills, but they also contributed large amounts of money, which allowed the church to make major improvements. Often with some of the money they received, the church also donated it to the poor and to the building of infrastructure, which further helped the development of England. William also invited foreign monks and scholars to Normandy to be a part of the church (CN Trueman). This decision made it possible to spread Norman culture due to the fact that these scholars and monks were coming to and from England, which allowed them to transport culture and language. Before his death, he declared that he would like his wealth and possessions to go to a certain place. This place is described from The Ecclesiastical History with, “…The wise king ordered all his treasures to be distributed among the churches and the poor” (Ordericus). …show more content…
At the beginning of William’s reign as king, he established many laws that helped England thrive. These laws not only helped him stay in control, but they also helped to prevent rebellion, arguments among people, and offered protection. For example, one of the laws he created is described with, “…that every freeman shall affirm by oath and compact that he will be loyal to King William both within and without England” (William the Conqueror, Medieval Sourcebook). This quote explains one of the very important laws William enforced, which was to swear loyalty to him. Although this law is partly selfish, it is also very smart because it would prevent rebellion and many other forms of conflict towards him, as well as England. Because people were forced to swear their loyalty to him, it meant that they were on his side and agreed with his views. Because they agreed with him and liked what he did, there would be no reason to rebel against him nor England. This would result in many lives as well as money being saved, because no one would be fighting. With all of this combined, England would be able to be a very strong force. Another very beneficial law that William created is shown with, “I will, moreover, that all men I have brought with me, or who have come after me, shall be protected by my peace and shall dwell in quiet” (William the Conqueror, Medieval Sourcebook). This

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Although Wolsey was able to celebrate success at the beginning of this juridical reformation and served his King successfully by making the system more efficient, meaning that his subjects were subjected to less waiting time and the system had less chance of being corrupted, it was eventually corrupted and abused. This turned a success into a failure and his own goals of removing threats to him from Henry, so that they would have no further influence, brought about another failure. He not only failed to serve his King, as his duties suffered when his timetable was overcome by too many court cases, but also failed to serve himself or the country. As a direct result of the Amicable Grant and the threatening poverty lead the problem of enclosure…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In January 1793, King Louis was executed, but the war was still going bad for France. The period following Louis’ death was known as ‘The Terror’ in France. It spread all over the country. This was a cruel period when France was killing its people by hundreds in a frightening way of rage and decadence. The people were arrested and executed without trial if they were accused of being enemies of the revolution.…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Middle Ages Dbq

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It all started when the Englishman, Earl Harold Godwinson, “was shipwrecked off the coast of Normandy”. This land was ruled by William the Conqueror, who made Harold promise on the bones of saints that he would either help William become king of England or become his vassal. William believed that Harold would keep his oath since it was holy and that he had the right to become king of England. Since the king at the time, King Edward the Professor, had a mother who was Norman, it only made since that a Norman should be king there. (Trueman)…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Now that Thomas Cromwell was Henry the VIII’s right-hand man, it was his duty to follow through with Henry’s plan to detach religiously from Rome. This was the ideal opportunity for Cromwell to prove that not only was he loyal to Henry and what he wanted, but that he was also capable of going beyond even what Wolsey had achieved. Fortunately, Cromwell recognized the power of the people in Parliament, and planned to use that power to his advantage in securing the strength of Henry’s overall power. His plan was rather simple, but could have completely fallen apart had it not been dealt with properly. Parliament needed to be convinced that the King’s sudden claim for supreme power was totally legitimate, and that the proposition to end Rome’s power and replace it with Royal Supremacy would be beneficial.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    only one who has the strength to defeat this creature of darkness. Beowulf proves his capability to defeat Grendel by being rewarded with Grendel’s arm. As described, “The monster’s whole body was in pain, a tremendous wound appeared on his shoulder. Sinews split and the bone- lappings burst. Beowulf was granted the glory of winning…” (806).…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Count William knew he could take advantage of his vassal Hugh because of his rank that was created by the feudal system. Even though Hugh had an important city and had a number of additional claims to other land, William asserted his unyielding power over his territory and thus Hugh’s; Hugh being William’s vassal. William asserted his authority over Hugh countless times, one example being when Hugh had “captured forty-three of the best horsemen” of an enemy and William demanded Hugh to “Hand over the men”. William did so by saying “because you are mine to do my will.”…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Napoleon Bonaparte is a perfect example of a man corrupted by power, Napoleon is so corrupted by his greed for power that he turns into an evil man, a villain. Napoleon may have been a villain but he was also incredibly smart, manipulative and conniving, he managed to convince a whole nation of his absolute patriarchy towards their country. He portrayed himself as the ultimate French men, the ultimate War General, the ultimate Ruler and the ultimate being. Napoleon did help to better France by promoting education and continuing to remove the effects of the feudal system. Napoleon was a smart man hut he allowed his ego and hunger for more power become his demise.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Beowulf Is A True Hero

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What is a true hero? Someone who slays dragons and beasts? Or just someone who people admire and respect? Although people can argue and debate over what a hero is, classic literature can often define what it means to be a true hero. In the story of Beowulf, Beowulf is not only strong and brave, but honest and generous also.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In my opinion Napoleon was a hero and not a tyrant because of the many modern systems and ideas that are still used today that were instituted by him. Firstly before Napoleon had come into power france had no standard law system, the punishment for lets say theft would vary from province to province and how powerful the person you stole from was. After napoleon had instituted the napoleonic code, france's first standard law system the punishment would not vary and you would get punished more severely simple because the person you stole from was influential. In Fact the napoleonic code is still used by dozens of nations around the world. Things the napoleonic covered where freedom of religion, it specified government jobs were to be given on…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Was Beowulf A Good Leader

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Even though he put his needs and values before others, Beowulf was a good king and leader because he was well respected among people and protected them from danger. Beowulf contained almost every attribute that makes one a good leader but such attributes also lead to the downfall of Beowulf his death. I believed Beowulf was a good leader and king amongst the people of Herot. Throughout the land Beowulf was a well respcted man and made sure people lived without fear. “ He kept our coffers and our kingdom safe.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Beowulf Is A Hero

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Pages

    belowulf is a great hero battling he risked a lot he tried his best always. he wanted to save the people and make things better for them.battling from one to another. all the great trophies be was bringing back from heads,shoulders,etc. he was a god,a good one. he had a battle wiith Grendel's mom she was kind of a hard one…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King Arthur's Heroic Hero

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think Arthur is heroic not only because he is brave and courageous but also because he strives to live up to the code of honor he sets for his knights. He really tries to follow his code even when it is not of benefit to him. For example, he give Mordred a place at court because his code of honor requires him to do so even when he know that Mordred is dangerous. He does not want to acknowledge Launcelot and Guenever because it would break the code by bringing a lady to dishonor and would not be in the best interest of the kingdom. Even after he is at war with Launcelot, he is willing to meet with him honorably.…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On the other hand, Paul Stock’s debate brings about the idea that Napoleon’s actions are not what lead people into believing that he is a hero or a villain, rather, the “interest in Bonaparte is driven by aesthetic and philosophical concerns: especially the question of whether Napoleon is an ordinary man ‘within’ history, or a semi-allegorical personage” (Stock 1). Stock further dwells into talking about how the perception of Napoleon as a hero or a villain was not based “along a political or chronological narrative”, but rather through romanticism through the British. Overall, Stock believes that Napoleon is “indeed ‘captive’ of Romantic imaginations”, which especially shown by Byron, who “calls him ‘Conqueror and Captive of the earth’ (Childe…

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    He does not act as if he is above the other pilgrims, or that they should respect him as an official on the journey. Rather, he acts as if he is just another pilgrim on the journey. He wishes to hear good, fun tales from all people, those of the middle and lower classes included. This attitude that is displayed by the knight shows that the upper class was starting to recognize the power of the middle class, and was beginning to respect people from the middle class. This is also reinforced because the Oxford Clerk, a member of the middle class due to his education, is one of the most well respected pilgrims by all of the others, showing that the middle class was growing in power, influence, and…

    • 2356 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    A hero can be defined as a common man who rises to greatness on the basis of sheer talent. Not only did Napoleon Bonaparte better France through his domestic policy, he also expanded the territory of France with many battles won through strategic warfare. He as well gave the citizens of France the sense of national identity and pride they needed. His many accomplishments modified the French society and ultimately the civilized world. Napoleon is sometimes viewed as a tyrant, but ultimately he showed more heroic nationalistic traits than tyrannical.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays