The Supreme Court Case Of Marbury V. Madison

Improved Essays
Marbury v. Madison

In November 1800 John Adams, President of the United States lost the election to Thomas Jefferson (65 to 39) . He also lost the control of Congress. Adams was a Federalist and Jefferson was Republican. They both believed that victory by the other person will be a disaster for the nation. As one of his last acts, Adams convinced the Congress to pass a new law which will grant him the power to appoint new judges. Three of the new justices of peace could not been appointed because Adam’s office ended and his secretary failed to deliver the official documents. One of these judges was William Marbury. When Jefferson found out that Adams is trying to fill the courts with Federalist judges he asked his Secretary of State, James
…show more content…
This is called judicial review. If a law violates the terms of the Constitution, the Supreme Court has the right to invalidate that law. Because of the judicial review the Supreme Court plays an important role in the well-functioning of the law system. It prevents the different sectors of government to abuse their power. According to these facts the U.S. Supreme Court has the ability to exercise judicial review of legislative acts and declare them …show more content…
Madison there is a hierarchy between the Constitution and federal legislative acts. Constitution should always be above the federal legislative acts.

The main arguments used by the Supreme Court were that if the court issued the writ of mandamus it would not matter anyway because they had no power to enforce it with the result that president Jefferson could just easily neglect it. Another argument was that if the Supreme Court refused to issue the writ then it would mean that they backed down before Jefferson. The final reason was that the Supreme Court declared the law of Judiciary Act of 1789 unconstitutional because it granted too much power to the court above the Constitution.

The final decision of the case showed that Jefferson’s secretary, James Madison had no right to prevent William Marbury from taking his office as a justice of peace. But on the other hand the Supreme Court has no power to force Jefferson and his secretary to let Marbury take his position because they would ignore what the court says. The law upon which Marbury’s claim was based on was declared by Chief Justice John Marshall unconstitutional . So after all that happened William Marbury could not become a justice of peace of the district

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Gibbons Vs Ogden Essay

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1803 William Marbury sued John Madison for being denied the role of Justice of Peace and claimed that the executive branch was forcing actions on the other branches. Before Thomas Jefferson was elected into his role of Presidency, William Marbury had been appointed to be a Justice of Peace by John Adams, but the appointment process had not fully been completed. By that time Jefferson had been in his role of Presidency and Adam's role was terminated. Thomas Jefferson had then denied Marbury access to his role appointed by the previous President, even though William had been expecting a role. William Marbury brought the case to the Supreme Court, stating that not one branch of the government was allowed to force an action upon another branch.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Jefferson attempted to ease the breach between the Federalists and Republicans by reaching out to his political opponents. Jefferson had been strongly criticized as an atheist, so he stated his beliefs in the importance of religion in his inaugural address. The most important point of his address was the importance of the freedom of religion. 2.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first question was answered when Marshall claimed that Marbury had a right for the writ of mandamus because he was appointed and followed procedures. The second answer was that the Supreme Court should provide a solution to Marbury’s inconveniences. Marshall also believed that the United States’ courts were at liberty to protect their citizens, no matter the situation. The third answer addressed judicial review because the “Court could not grant the writ because Section 13 of the Judicial Act of 1789… was unconstitutional insofar as it extended cases of original jurisdiction” (McBride). Marbury had rejected this act which inclined the Supreme Court to deny his position.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    During the election of 1800, President John Adams realized he was losing to the Democratic-Republican candidate Thomas Jefferson. Fearing that the Federalists were going to become the minority party, Adams decides to appoint a substantial number of Federalists to the Justices of Peace in the closing months of his presidency. However, before all of the commissions could be sent out, Thomas Jefferson assumed the presidency on March 5th, 1801. Jefferson immediately notices all of the unsent commissions, and orders the new Secretary of State, James Madison, not to deliver them. William Marbury, one of Adam's Federalist appointees, noticed that he never received his commission.…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marbury v. Madison was a result of the lame duck period, when the power shifted from the federalists when John Adams was president to Thomas Jefferson, a democratic republican. The night before Jefferson went into presidency, Adams appoints a whole load of new judges so federalists could still have some power. William Marbury was supposed to be one of these judges but was not appointed to be one in time because Jefferson became president. Marbury then asked the Court to issue a writ of mandamus to secretary of state, James Madison but Jefferson decided to withdraw all the new commissions and ordered Madison deny them. This called for John Marshall to rule on this argument.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Presidential election of 1800 President John Adams lost his reelection bid to Vice President. Adams being a staunch Federalist opposed the political beliefs Jefferson, who was a Republican. With Jefferson becoming President, Adams feared that his Federalist party would lose ground in the in the government, and the Republican would give power to the states. To prevent this Adams and his Federalist Congress decided to increase the number of Judicial positions inside the inside the Judicial Branch. President Adams spent his last hours in officer appointing Federalist judge in all positions.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice Marshall wrote the unanimous decision that stated Marbury had the right to sue. The Judiciary act of 1789 was considered unconstitutional4. The Supreme Court cannot mandate something happen. The Writ of Mandamus expanded the power that the court has under the constitution. The judiciary act of 1789 directly conflicted with the U.S Constitution.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If he had such a right, and the right was violated, did the law provide a remedy? And if the law provided a remedy, was the proper remedy a direct order from the Supreme Court? Writing for the Court, Marshall answered the first two questions resoundingly in the affirmative. Marbury’s commission had been signed by the President and sealed by the Secretary of State, he noted, establishing an appointment that could not be revoked by a new executive. Failure to deliver the commission thus violated Marbury’s legal right to the office.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, when Jefferson came into office he decided that he did not what the appointed justices and did not deliver the commissions. Indignation arose to one of the Justices appointed, William Marbury. William Marbury then took action and petitions the Supreme Court for a manding to demonstrate the cause why he did not receive his commission.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Marshall responded by stating that if congressional acts conflict with the Constitution, then they are now law, because the judiciary's responsibility is to uphold the Constitution. Marshall also stated that the court may decide which law applies to a given case. As a result, Marbury never did receive his job. Jefferson and Madison denied Marbury’s commission because the “midnight judges” were appointed by Adams, a mere few hours before Jefferson’s inauguration.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court should be able to overturn unconstitutional laws that Congress has passed. There are many reasons to give the Supreme Court this power, first we need someone to enforce the fact that no law should violate the Constitution. Next, it helps balance the three branches of government, and lastly the Constitution puts judicial power into the Supreme Court and inferior courts. This power will stop substandard laws from getting passed, and will protect the structure of our government that is extremely based on the Constitution.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marbury then applied to the court for a writ of mandamus. The court then ordered Madison to show why the writ should not be issued. The case proceeded after showing no cause. As the court view the case, they had to consider the following questions and then the decision would be made. The first question was “Has the applicant a right to the commission he demands?”…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marbury Vs Madison

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Marbury vs. Madison took place on 1803, it is the most vital case in Supreme Court history. Chief Justice John Marshall chooses the point of interest instance of William Marbury versus James Madison, Secretary of State of the United States and asserts the legal standard of lawful audit. The Supreme court decided the new president was Thomas Jefferson, he is one of the most important secretary of state, James Madison, should have not kept William Marbury from taking office as equity of the peace for Washington County in Columbia. On the other hand, it likewise decided that the court had no purview for the situation and couldn't constrain Jefferson and Madison to situate Marbury.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1786 the federal government realized that America would not survive with the articles of confederation (“Articles of Confederation”). In the summer of 1787, 55 men gathered to amend the Articles of Confederation (“Constitution”). The Constitution had to have compromise for it to pass(“Constitution”). One of those compromises was the Bill of Rights (“Constitution”). There were two sides the federalist and the anti-federalist (“Constitution”).…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court, as Justice Madison puts it, is the Supreme interpreter of the law, and all laws that are not constitutional must be strike down. Brandeis also thinks this way. He thinks the interpreter of the law has supervisory powers. They must be impartial and not allow a citizen or government official to break the law. If citizens break the law, then the appropriate punishment applies according to the statutes; however, if the government breaks the law, then sanctions applies to uphold the integrity of the law.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays