Wikipedia's Credibility In A Competitive Industry

Improved Essays
If you run a business in a competitive industry, you know how important it is to appear credible in the eyes of consumers. If given a choice between two similar companies, people will do business with the one that comes across as being more professional. Except for testimonials, a Wikipedia page about your business is the best way to gain credibility and trust. Consumers trust Wikipedia's neutral viewpoint, with legitimate, third-party references to back up each fact about your organization. They want to know who founded your company, when you opened the doors for business and where you're headquartered; this shows that you have nothing to hide.

You're probably wondering when you would find the time necessary to create your own Wikipedia

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Nt1330 Unit 3 Assignment 1

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Wiki- is an open website for users to add their own information to help others. It is a huge encyclopaedia where users can join and write articles or new ones to help people for what they are searching for. Information is passed on around because users can edit on the article and insert their own information relevant to the article. You can either edit or change information on it. Here is an example…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Bus 1101 Question Paper

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Have a long time frame-10 to 30 years. The time frame listed goes back 10- 30 years with combined history. Are you clear, compelling and easy to grasp. Is the About page compelling and easy to grasp along with the introductions of everyone, It might be for some? Directly reflect your core values and purpose.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (The Editors of Encyclopaedia…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The ‘Undue Weight’ of Truth on Wikipedia by Timothy Messer-Kruse is a great article about Kruse’s experience with the information, authors, and policies on Wikipedia. During the reading Kruse made valid points about Wikipedia’s policies and the requirements that need to be met in order to change an article on the website; these points left me with many questions. For example, why do secondary sources have more weight than certain primary sources? One would think that testimony from the publishing by the Library of Congress would have more weight than a book published about the case. Aside from the questions left unanswered, this was a very interesting and amusing article that catches the reader’s attention and promotes more in-depth…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Non Credible Sources

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Another thing that makes Wikipedia a non-credible source is that anyone can make updates or change any/all of the information on the page as long as you create a Wikipedia account. This is portrayed within the URL provided above with each edit from different authors. The hardest part about sifting through the nutritional information was having to verify whether or not the information given on this site was accurate by going to a credible source to compare the information. Sifting through the information just way too time consuming, incredibly inconvenient and entirely…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Waters in Why You Can’t Cite Wikipedia in My Class would say “Wikipedia owes its incredible growth to open-source editing, which is also the root of its greatest weakness” (16). I disagree with this statement and agree with Crovitz and Smoot instead, in Wikipedia: Friend, Not Foe they state, “Because Wikipedia is always evolving, its entries often include unconventional sections that might never have been included in a traditional encyclopedia” (93). To me this means that you could actually find valuable information in Wikipedia as it becomes available that you would not find in Encyclopedias since they are not updated as Wikipedia…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Witch Hunt And Mccarthyism

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages

    While I also have some other information pulled from different sources to make several…

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Increasingly so, the world is shifting to life on technology, rather than life in books, but is it for the better? Humans are becoming less and less dependent on books and common knowledge, and more reliant upon engines like google to act as a brain. People under the age of thirty are paving the way for the upcoming “dumbest generation”, by replacing thinking with technology, disregarding books and reading, and lessening the language skills of their own generation. In the current age of technology, there are massive amounts of resources that can be used to obtain any kind of information that one can imagine.…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Impact of Fake News on Society “Google, Democracy and the Truth About Internet Search” written by Carole Cadwalladr discusses how the quickly evolving internet is connected to the growth of fake news in our society. Articles such as this lead to a wide variety of questions about the world today. Now ask yourself, how has society been affected by the popularity of fake news on the internet? No matter where you happen to stumble upon the internet, there’s a chance you’ll come across a form of fake news. On that note, fake news can become a highly irritating thing.…

    • 2060 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After watch the two short video my considerations are, Wikipedia, an online information center, has in a general sense changed the substance of reference books and shrewd journals over the span of the latest ten years. It is quickly taking books, journals, and money out of the condition for examination. Wikipedia has made another way to deal with amass information, casual association, and do ask about. Notwithstanding the way that Wikipedia has its positive uses it is not for the most part a strong source and is best used as a starting stage for investigation.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why trust Wikipedia Wikipedia is known worldwide for its free, anonymously edited entries. But, is it reliable? The question has stood for a long time. Professors from all over have said that Wikipedia is not reliable, and some have even restricted the use of it from their students.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1. Reliable source: a source with accurate information that has been consistently confirmed over and over again throughout the past to have accurate/precise information Example: An example of a reliable source would be the CIA World Factbook. This is a credible source because it is a government website. Other credible source could include academic journals, Purdue Owl, other government websites, etc. 2.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The internet helps people simply find knowledge from Wikipedia and discuss academic question on the forums. Thus, the academic forums and Wikipedia are supplemental evidences to prove that the Internet can do things which the college do. This idea confirms the function of the internet but ignores that quality of knowledge on the Internet is not valid. As we know neither academic forums nor Wikipedia belong in any colleges or universities or educational institution. Generally, most of the similar websites on the internets are open source and free to be edited.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Stand Against Wikipedia by Scott Jaschik draw attention on how students should not use Wikipedia as a resources due to its inaccuracy details and lack completeness entries. In his article he emphasize, “ As Wikipedia has become more and more popular with students, some professors have become increasingly concerned about the online, reader- produced encyclopedia.” Scott have a point where there is plenty of inaccuracy details, but that’s not accurate at all. If the person gathered enough sources that seemingly relates one to the other, then there the sources surely is accurate. Basically, don’t rely on one resources, the researchers needs plenty of resources in order for him or her to make a case or support his or her idea.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tone and Style are important on Wikipedia. Clearly, a certain style and tone are expected on Wikipedia. The best way to get a good idea about the style and tone set by the site is to read their guidelines on this specific subject or to simply browse the site and read a few of their top articles. In addition, this article provides you with information on the tone and style that they prefer on the Wikipedia website. Let's take a closer look.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays