Wiki- is an open website for users to add their own information to help others. It is a huge encyclopaedia where users can join and write articles or new ones to help people for what they are searching for. Information is passed on around because users can edit on the article and insert their own information relevant to the article. You can either edit or change information on it. Here is an example…
Prior to reading Chapter 1 and “At Sea in a Deluge of Data”, I realized how elementary my definition of information literacy was. I believed information literacy was the ability to find information using a variety of research methods. So, you can imagine reading the definition was surprising, yet the definition seemed simplistic. Per our course text, “Information literacy is the ability to identify a need for information and successfully locate, evaluate, and use that information ethically and legally for a determined purpose”.…
Is Google Making Us Stupid? When it comes to this topic on the internet versus our intelligence, I have a similar case to argue that Nicholas Carr, the author, explains. I agree with the argument that Google, or the Net in general are corrupting and shaping our minds. Carr starts off by describing his experience with deep reading.…
Today’s world is built upon informative, connected networks that is the internet. The internet is simply an infinite database in which anyone that has a computer can access. Despite what some may argue, the internet is not making us stupid. Instead, the internet simply provides society with useful information at a stroke of a key.…
Another thing that makes Wikipedia a non-credible source is that anyone can make updates or change any/all of the information on the page as long as you create a Wikipedia account. This is portrayed within the URL provided above with each edit from different authors. The hardest part about sifting through the nutritional information was having to verify whether or not the information given on this site was accurate by going to a credible source to compare the information. Sifting through the information just way too time consuming, incredibly inconvenient and entirely…
When doing research on a paper you are writing you find yourself asking if a website is credible or not. You may think it is not credible because of how the website is layed out or that the information is so old that it doesn't apply today. If you find yourself asking that question then you need to look at what makes a source credible. The things to determine whether a website is credible or not is authority, accuracy, and currentisity of that specific website.…
Increasingly so, the world is shifting to life on technology, rather than life in books, but is it for the better? Humans are becoming less and less dependent on books and common knowledge, and more reliant upon engines like google to act as a brain. People under the age of thirty are paving the way for the upcoming “dumbest generation”, by replacing thinking with technology, disregarding books and reading, and lessening the language skills of their own generation. In the current age of technology, there are massive amounts of resources that can be used to obtain any kind of information that one can imagine.…
In the article “How Google, Wikipedia Have Changed Our Lives-For Better and Worse”. Jennifer Woodard Maderazo Introduces How the internet has changed the learning aspect of students in school. It Inflicts how back then when modern technology wasn’t prevalent, students had to use books to research the questions they worked on. As of now in current times more students tend to use the internet as a more useful source than going to a library and taking the time to source/research the information. Also it Generalizes how when students began studying back then in the early ages students were more dedicated to learning about the class and relying on classroom experience.…
Here is a fun fact, Google is making us stupid. Think about this you’re on earth, but without your phone or tablet, you would be bored out of your mind and want to know a way to be able to distract yourself. The articles we read state that Google is making us stupid. I honestly think that Google is making our generation dumber. First of all, you would think that Google is making us smarter because it’s able to access us information in the blink of an eye.…
The process that I used to was to cut and paste a paragraph into a google search box and I was able to find the original source of the information. This was an important lesson for me to learn. My students do need to know about and…
I want to learn more about football helmets and its history. So I took my time and looked things up. I play football and when I get hit I feel safe knowing that this helmets are meant for this sport. Will keep playing this sport until I’m done with high school. Doing some research I saw that they played with just some leather helmets and they were big guys.…
The internet helps people simply find knowledge from Wikipedia and discuss academic question on the forums. Thus, the academic forums and Wikipedia are supplemental evidences to prove that the Internet can do things which the college do. This idea confirms the function of the internet but ignores that quality of knowledge on the Internet is not valid. As we know neither academic forums nor Wikipedia belong in any colleges or universities or educational institution. Generally, most of the similar websites on the internets are open source and free to be edited.…
A Stand Against Wikipedia by Scott Jaschik draw attention on how students should not use Wikipedia as a resources due to its inaccuracy details and lack completeness entries. In his article he emphasize, “ As Wikipedia has become more and more popular with students, some professors have become increasingly concerned about the online, reader- produced encyclopedia.” Scott have a point where there is plenty of inaccuracy details, but that’s not accurate at all. If the person gathered enough sources that seemingly relates one to the other, then there the sources surely is accurate. Basically, don’t rely on one resources, the researchers needs plenty of resources in order for him or her to make a case or support his or her idea.…
Even when I had been going through middle school and high school, my teachers had always been very clear about not using Wikipedia as a source. They would only go as far as to suggest that it could be used as a start for research, but never as an actual source for a project. She uses examples of student’s interviews, the fact that it is constantly updated, and how it has a better example of the American Revolution than an advanced class. She discusses how students had been told to not use Wikipedia as a “main source”, but they were not told why they were not allowed to use Wikipedia or why other sources were more trustworthy. People use Wikipedia to spread their knowledge and, it is usually much easier for people to understand a difficult topic if it is explained by another…
A computer is as accurate as the data that is inputed into the system. According to Robert Murray Thomas in Conducting Educational Research: A Comparative View, “Computers are generally highly accurate and reliable. In the great majority of instances, when errors do occur, the fault either lies with the person who wrote the software program which carries out the computations or else with the people who are operating the computer” (Thomas 337-338). Computers have the ability to compute data at quicker speeds than people, and the results that are created will be as accurate as the data that is inputed into the computer. People are not as accurate or as quick as a computer.…