Why Were Plebeians Important To Rome

Improved Essays
Why were plebeians so important to Rome?
A Plebeian, is “(in ancient Rome) a Commoner”- Oxford Dictionary. The term evolved from referring not only to the local plebeians in ancient Rome but also generally, a commoner. In the context of ancient Rome however, the plebeians would break out of this definition and eventually become the commoners’ dream.
To properly address this question, it is important to consider the timeline of plebeian importance in Rome, considering their transition of status from commoners to complete equals with the patricians, as full roman citizens and equals before the law. Regardless of a timeline however, it can be seen that the plebeians were very important to Rome even when their social status was at its lowest because
…show more content…
A farm without seeders or harvesters serves no purpose, just as a country without a workforce will have its societal and economical wheels stuck in the mud. That is what the plebeians were to Rome; the spinners of the wheel. In Rome, if a wealthy patrician was going to go out to buy bread say from a bakery, he would most likely meet a plebeian baker. Think of this example in terms of needing to build a house or a need to purchase craft; needs, both of which would be served by a plebeian builder or a craftsman respectively. The plebeians were the working class of Rome at the time, and their importance was not only evident in their empowerment of local trade but I believe in the overall economic structure of ancient Rome. The plebeians were important to Rome because their absence meant they would be baking their own bread and building their own city mansions. Non-figuratively speaking, the plebeians were important to Rome because they made up the vast majority of Rome’s working …show more content…
More interesting though is how the romans always seemed to bend to their demands. I was curious as to why this was so. Now for the final reason why I think the plebeians were important to Rome. That reason is societal stability. Remember how the Spartans were always afraid of a takeover by the rising helot population? They structured their whole military to suppress that possibility. In the case of Rome, however, the plebeians also served in the military. In addition to that, their large population in society could serve as a threat to Rome if an uprising were to occur. This among many other reasons discussed is why I believe the patricians bent to the plebeians demands time and time again. They had power in numbers.
Conclusion
In my view, the plebeians are one the most brilliant groups of ancient times. They knew their importance to Rome and they used that as bargaining chips to negotiate their way all the way up to where they believed they belonged- at the same level as the patricians. Other peoples would have fought or decided to wage war, but the fact that the plebeians seceded five times confirms to me that they knew were not expendable and the wheels of Rome would be stuck without

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Ancient Rome is known to be a powerful and well put together civilization that was somewhat meeting the common good. The reason that Ancient Rome was a successful city was because they had a republic. A republic is a democracy where the people of Rome get to choose their leaders. The city had a huge population with a strong government. They had the five meanings of government, which were providing public services, protect rights, promote rule of law, prepare for a common defense, and support the economic system. Rome did best in most of these categories, but they failed in other ones too.…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Back then if you have more land it means that you have more power, more power means you can control more. The Romans built an effective transportation system that was used solely for their military. However, it was later proven that the roads were used for expansion on land. In document 2 it states, “The military nature of the roads continued to be essential as Romans expanded into territory outside of Italy.” The expansion increased the number of slave labor and the gap between the rich and the poor grew. Although they have a lot of lands to control, they had to constantly fight to defend their growing empire whilst conquering new land. As a result to this, the Romans needed a powerful army thus having the plebeians (lower rank) to also join the fight by…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Livy Vs Plutarch Analysis

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages

    His background as a prominent philosopher are more than likely the root of his broad themes and reasons for looking at history as a series of cause and effect rather than just chronologically listing the events themselves. The introduction of “The Makers of Rome” wasn 't written by Plutarch, but it does layout the main themes of Rome as an invincible military force, and the power struggle between Plebeians and Patricians. (Pg. 5-6) This method of taking a step back and trying to relate events is, in a way, more effective at describing the material to the audience, but also doesn 't go as in depth with details. The other benefit is that Plutarch is able to draw his own philosophical ideas and opinions into the mix and present Rome in whatever light he wishes. Being a prod Roman, he chooses to portray Rome as having great leaders by selectively writing about certain great politicians, one such politician is Tiberius Gracchus. Plutarch describes him as having a great character and tells a story/legend on page 133 about Tiberius catching a pair of snakes, one male, the other female. The augurs then state that one must die if the other is to live and that the male represented himself, and the female his wife. However, Tiberius had such great character that he chose to kill the male and release the female because his wife hadn 't lived as many years as him. This story portrays Tiberius as a noble and logical man with a love of his wife, capable of choosing his own destiny. The information left out in this tale, is that Tiberius was actually murdered by Roman Senate members. This was left out by Plutarch because it would force the reader to ask questions about why Tiberius was killed by his fellow government officials. Instead, what the reader receives is a clear depiction of a noble politician that had high morals. This then ties into…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, the creation of latrines and sewer systems was an important innovation within the empire because without these structures there would be a quickly spreading threat of disease, which would not only contaminate the homes of the Romans, but their food and water supplies could become tainted as well if they were to cultivate with dirt that may contain human fecal matter (Scobie 2003, 130-132). Those who were upper class were able to afford to have latrines created in or near their homes for better hygiene and to prevent any health concerns. The poorer people, known as plebeians in Rome, were not able to afford a latrine and would have to live in filthier and likely unhealthy conditions. Not everything would be a negative experience because there was always an upside to being a citizen of the Empire. Citizens enjoyed banquets and valued friendships among one another thus creating a tight knit society according to Veyne (Pleasures and Excesses in the Roman Empire 2003, 110-113). The banquets were known to be more than just food and friends but it would be open to intelligent conversations, dancing, eating and merriment among all citizens of all classes, including slaves who would serve food and drink among partygoers. Veyne generally concluded that the citizens wanted to live for entertainment and to fulfill their lust for the life full of luxury and intelligence. The people would join groups called confraternities which were glorified interest clubs where they would speak and share information and ideas with one…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first major opinion change of the Plebeians occurs in the very beginning of the book. The Plebeians love Pompey but then they celebrate his defeat by Caesar. Marullus…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han Dynasty

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the 3rd century B.C.E. Rome, a republic and the dominant state on the Italian peninsula, emerged as a new Mediterranean power. When Rome became a city-state, the people were mostly farmers. The early Romans spoke Latin. They borrowed elements of culture from Sicily and the Italian coast. The ideas contributed included planning, gold and bronze, gods and goddesses, and arch building technology. They also set up a Greek style government. Rome became a major center of the Hellenistic culture that went out across the western Mediterranean and Europe. When Rome became a city-state, social tension was already there. The wealthy sat with the senate while everyone else were known as plebs. A social and political system that let people have power…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ancient Rome was a massive empire. They were influenced by other cultures such as the Etruscans and the Greeks. The Romans also conquered many other civilizations, but did they meet the common good? To meet the common good Rome had to do several things. Moreover, they had to protect rights, prepare for the common defense, and of equal importance, they had to provide public services. With all of these criteria, Ancient Rome somewhat met the common good.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ancient Roman Common Good

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ancient Rome used to be ruled over by a king, but then eventually everything got out of hand and the King was overruled. The Roman Empire turned into being a republic. They didn’t want to be ruled over by a king, they wanted to make their own decisions, their own laws, and they want to have their own democracy. One challenge when there is a republic is meeting the common good. Now looking back on everything ancient room only somewhat not the common good In their empire.…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Roman Republic functioned like Aristotle’s ideal city-state, smallish, organic society with a network comprised of leaders who all depended on each other and stayed current. However In 450 b.c the “Twelve Tables” were established as the first written legal code. Formed basis for all subsequent Roman jurisprudence. Property rights were paramount concern and the tables defined circumstances of property repossessions and indentured labor/slavery. Although it did not solve a lot of their problems, it was a further step towards equality. In 367 B.C, patricians finally agreed to plebeian consuls and in 287 B.C, patricians and plebeians formally merged…

    • 1899 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Optimates were senatorial purists that limited power of the plebian assemblies (commoners’ assembly) and thought that citizenship should be granted to far less people, while the populares were people who agreed on land and wealth distribution. They looked at citizenship openly and wanted to loosen the senate’s political iron-grip. The conflict couldn’t be civilly discussed because the politics had no mechanism to deal with opposing sides peacefully, so the problem ended in violence and war. Wide gaps between the rich and the poor were also created as Rome grew; as a result, two men whose names were Tiberius and Gaius tried to help the poor people find jobs but the senators killed him, similar to Julius Caesar’s murder. Conflict arose from this as well. Just because of different viewpoints, the senators murdered one of their own, and the Roman government needed to take steps to deter…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    For example, Cato, a famous politician, had “thundered against the influence of the “weakling” Greeks on the “sturdy” Romans,” (Cato 159). Through this quote, it is implied that if the Romans ever procreate Greek values, they would ultimately lose their power. Knowing this, Romans did not mirror the Greeks war tactics, as they were considered to be mediocre. But all in all, their strategies correlated with their own destruction because they became too cocky and took more land than they could handle. Rome expanded to control vast territories because it brought in outsiders. The downfall to this is, a militia can only control so much territory at once and the Roman Republic definitely exceeded their limits aiding to the collapse of the Roman Republic. Rome‘s controlled territory had grown to such an extent that the existing political system could not be effectively controlled or ran. For example the Making of the West had written, “fear of attacks and the desire for wealth propelled roman imperialism” (151). Through this quote, it is seen that Rome was indeed on edge, but still somehow remained greedy. The Senate was unfortunately more concerned with boosting and maintaining its own power, disregarding all other important aspects. Once the soldiers returned home they found that their homes had been taken over by wealthy senators,…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Save The Roman Republic

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages

    However, none of this would matter if it was all for the common good of Rome and to save the republic, except there wasn’t a true republic to save. Most of the senators were in their position of power because of their families and their wealth. Consequently some of the senators looked down upon the citizens such as when Casca said “if Caesar had stabbed their mothers, they would’ve forgiven him”(I,ii,269-270) to criticize the people of Rome. Their similar backgrounds likely meant that they rarely had opposing viewpoints. The Roman people did not have the same background as the senators and, the citizens’ views were rarely properly represented by these senators. The fact that the republic did not entirely work like a republic means that a…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The huge milestone of the Struggle of the Orders dealt with the struggle between the patricians and plebeians. Rank and order was everything to the Romans, they even used names to “…signify a person’s place in Roman society” (Spielvogel 118). Everybody had a role to play, but the patricians used their money and social status to control the government and empire. The centuriate assembly, even though it had plebeians, was dominated by patricians because of the way it was structured, this was a…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Republic was in control of many regions and not all of these inhabitants were delighted with the current circumstances, especially the citizens in Rome. During the period of the expansion of Rome, the government was becoming less democratic and started displaying signs of an oligarchy. The Senate of the Roman Republic was the prime branch of government. This was comprised of leaders from the patricians, the noble, and wealthy families of ancient Rome. Members of the senate were not elected but were chosen by the Consuls.2 The senate’s main task was to direct spending and verdicts associating with foreign powers. Money in this period meant everything. It characterized your status and ranked your authoritative control. During this time, the Senate was supposed to represent the issues and concerns of the general population of Rome. However, the Roman Senate settled on specific matters without alluding to the assembly of the people. As a result, commanders of the military were given expanded term lengths and power.3 All the power that was supposed to be given to the people, as it rightfully is in a true democracy, was now given to the wealthy and well-known nobles. This resulted in the Roman Republic no longer standing as a democratic…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ancient Rome is important period of history for all modern societies, because of their influence in language, literature, religion, art, and our government and law. Rome conquered and controlled all the powerful countries of the old world, and united them all under Roman rule. As a result, they influenced a larger group of people with their cultures and beliefs. Rome was important to our current world because after the Roman Empire fell each state that was separated became states like France, Spain, Italy, and England. The Romans learned from their captured people, and many were look at like savages, but they converted them into civilized nations. Even their language changed from harsh and rough into a cultured language with poets. While Greeks…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics