War Against Jap Argumentative Analysis

Improved Essays
There were several Wars having to include weapons and force against each other. However, there were certain weapons that people were biased to either use or not use. In the War against Japan, the US was debating to drop the atomic bomb. There are three main arguments why they should and three why they shouldn’t. Japan was an enemy to the United States at one point. The United States believed in dropping the atomic bomb in Japan. One reason was the bomb saved American lives. People believed it was necessary to end the war as soon as possible. Ending the War early would prevent the number of deaths. The number of deaths were extremely ranking high. There were a various of American soldiers, navy, and military people dying. For this reason, the Unites States wanted to end it as soon as possible. Diverse people predicted that the invasion of the Japanese mainland would cost over 1 million American lives and cost a greater amount of Japanese lives. So this was to save those lives that would have been lost. The second motive was that the Japanese were given fair warning. The United States gave Japan multiply …show more content…
It is an endless discussion. As a result, I do go for the bomb. I find it more reasonable because it helped the United States in plenty ways. Not only did it help the US, but it also helped the Japanese. The bomb was never for negative intentions. It was to keep peace and to end the War. The US wanted to end the war quickly without costing the lives of soldiers. So, the president agreed to drop the bombs. It made the Japanese surrender because they knew that if they continued the war they could not win. Yes, it is a bad that innocent people died in the atomic bombings, but it could have been worse. Japan was given a clear warning and the US did try to let them surrender. In addition, they had a chance to back down, but they wanted to keep going which is why it was

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “Was the U.S justified in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second World War? Discuss the benefits and costs that it resulted.” 1. Introduction During World War Two, the U.S dropped two atomic bombs on the cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, causing high death rates upon the Japanese. Many people may argue that the bombings were devastating and have had a dreadful effect on people’s lives.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    DBQ: Dropping the Atomic Bomb on Japan The decision President Truman had to make regarding dropping a fission bomb onto Japanese cities in order to end the war would have been too hard for most of us to handle. America was weary after 4 years of almost total war with Germany, Italy, and Japan and the war needed to end. At this point, Japan was alone and dragging its feet after many losses. From the history we know, the decision was justified as it ended a devastating war with no end in sight and it saved more lives than were lost.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United State’s decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan during World War ll is one of the most arguable controversies in American history due to the questionable reasoning behind its use, and the horrific effects it had on Japanese citizens. At the time of the bombing it was actually supported by a vast majority of the American public. During 1945, the decision to use the bomb was not only supported but encouraged. In August of 1945 opinion polls given to the American public showed 85% of Americans supported bombing Japan (Hadley, 21). On the contrary, historians such as Gar Alperovitz have argued Truman used the bomb merely to gain political status and power over the Soviets.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Japan’s economy was down and running out of resources, but by the U.S. dropping the bombs it ended the war and allowed Japan to rebuild its country. The atomic bomb did cause fatalities, but it saved more lives that if the war was to be…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The dropping of atomic bombs is Hiroshima and Nagasaki was one of the most catastrophic bombing is history. It resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths and the destruction of more than half of the cities infrastructures. Nonetheless Harry S. Truman and his advisors saw it as the only way to lead Japan to an unconditional surrender. While this is simply the opinion of the United States Commander in Chief and his advisors, there is a lot of controversy as to if it was truly a necessity in forcing Japan to surrender and ending the war. In the “Yes” article, “The Biggest Decision: Why We Had To Drop The Atomic Bomb” by Robert James Maddox argues why dropping atomic bombs in Japan became a necessity when land invasions and the Russians’ mediation were not effective.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A decision of President Truman of America in 1945 to drop a bomb in Hiroshima and Nagasaki causes many arguments for people. Some people say he should do it, some people say he should do it, and some people are neutral. I disagree with his decision to drop bombs in 2 cities of Japan. According to many government records from discussion of class, lectures and websites, this argument will be made.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It had appeared that the Japanese were not going to surrender the way America wanted them to. Of course a big reason why the bomb was used is that if Japan would have been invaded, the death toll could have potentially reached half a million or more instead of the hundreds of thousands that were killed by the atomic bomb. It is said that if the war had continued the amount of American lives lost could have greatly diminished the amount that was killed by the bombs. It is hard to tell what could have really happened but it is certain that if the war had continued so would the loss of…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    You have heard two reasons why dropping the atomic bombs in Japan was not justified and unnecessary. But perhaps the most compelling reasons why dropping the bomb was not justified is that the United States was weeks or months away from Japan surrendering and the war ending before dropping the bombs and killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people. As you will hear from General Mitsuru Ushijima, Japan was already losing the war. The country was surrounded by US troops, Americans controlled Japanese airspace and waterways, and US casualties in military battles were low compared to Japanese. The US commanders knew that Japan was close to surrendering as Germany had already surrendered, and Russia, another powerful military force, was…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 1945, the United States made a fateful decision: to drop not just one, but two atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan. These decisions would spur debate amongst historians for the next sixty-nine years and will most likely continue to do so for some time. One historian, J. Samuel Walker, wrote a book on the topic entitled Prompt & Utter Destruction: Truman and the Use of Atomic Bombs Against Japan. This publication examines the decision-making process followed when the US government was contemplating dropping the atomic bomb on Japan. This book focuses especially on the new President Truman who was just coming into his presidency in 1945.…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States of America dropping the atomic bombs on Japanese cities, Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6th and August 9th, 1945, was a very controversial decision and the opinions as to if the attacks were justified or not differ between those living in Japan and the U.S. The U.S’s act of dropping the atomic bombs was not justified because the long lasting health effects the bombings had on the population was disastrous, Japan’s army was inevitably facing defeat, and the mass destruction caused by the attacks lead to social damages throughout Japan. Although the atomic bombs did ensure victory for the U.S and British forces, it was a victory that definitely came with a cost; the significant loss of the Japanese population.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The decision to use nuclear weapons The decision, made by the United States of America, to drop nuclear bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki may not have been the most popular or best choice for the planet; but however, it was the choice that needed to be made to end the war in the pacific. This decision was made so that both sides would suffer the lowest number of casualties possible. The United States had a conference with Japanese leaders to attempt to bring the war to an end peacefully, however the Japanese had made it very clear to the United States and president Truman that they had no intention of abandoning the code of honor they live by and would fight until the last man. After this conference the Decision to drop…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Another reason, is to show the Soviet Union how powerful United States has became, and avoid conflict protected United States economy which means that other world economies would do well. Truman 's decision to drop the Atomic Bomb was righteous since, Truman wanted to end the war quickly. One explanation that describes why Harry S. Truman declared the dropping of the atomic bomb was because it was necessary in order to minimum the amount of bloodshed. The bombing has saved the potential lives that would have been lost if not for bomb; saved more than estimate 75,000 lives. If the atomic bombs were not dropped then more of American lives would have gone.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Bomb During the summer of 1945, things were looking pretty grim for Imperial Japan, as they were the last axis power left and had been under constant firebombing for the United States, President Truman chose to drop two atomic bombs, one on Hiroshima on August 6th and one on Nagasaki on August 9th. Since before either of the two bombs had been dropped, it has been debated whether or not it was the right decision. Truman stated that the bombs were dropped to save American lives, but many argue over the government’s other motives at the time. Many bring up valid points over why the bomb should not have been dropped and that the government public justification for dropping the bomb was based off of false information, but ultimately the motivation behind dropping the bomb, hidden by the government or not, outweighs the reasons for not dropping the bomb.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paragraph 1- Write about the experiences of Women on the home front and abroad during WWII. Women in the United States played a crucial role during WWII. Without the help of women the United States would not have been able to succeed as they did. Due to a large number of men leaving the workforce to fight, a large number of new workers were needed and “more than 6 million of these new workers were women”(Mobilizing for Defense 4). These 6 million women served an important role on the home front and without them the United States would have struggled to produce any type of product just due to the lack of labor.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The justification of the bombing of Japan (Hiroshima and Nagasaki) has been one of the most debated topics in the history of the United States. Proponents of the idea that the bombings were justified argue that the U.S President at the time, Harry S. Truman, had an obligation to promote the welfare of the United States. Those who believe that the bomb was justified argue that, when American lives are at risks, a president has a duty to end the war in any way that they possibly can. However, those in opposition argue that the United States killed civilians, and helped to usher in a new era of fear in war. I believe firmly that the latter, those who believe that the use of atomic weapons on civilians was an act that was unnecessary and unjustified,…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays