It is an endless discussion. As a result, I do go for the bomb. I find it more reasonable because it helped the United States in plenty ways. Not only did it help the US, but it also helped the Japanese. The bomb was never for negative intentions. It was to keep peace and to end the War. The US wanted to end the war quickly without costing the lives of soldiers. So, the president agreed to drop the bombs. It made the Japanese surrender because they knew that if they continued the war they could not win. Yes, it is a bad that innocent people died in the atomic bombings, but it could have been worse. Japan was given a clear warning and the US did try to let them surrender. In addition, they had a chance to back down, but they wanted to keep going which is why it was
It is an endless discussion. As a result, I do go for the bomb. I find it more reasonable because it helped the United States in plenty ways. Not only did it help the US, but it also helped the Japanese. The bomb was never for negative intentions. It was to keep peace and to end the War. The US wanted to end the war quickly without costing the lives of soldiers. So, the president agreed to drop the bombs. It made the Japanese surrender because they knew that if they continued the war they could not win. Yes, it is a bad that innocent people died in the atomic bombings, but it could have been worse. Japan was given a clear warning and the US did try to let them surrender. In addition, they had a chance to back down, but they wanted to keep going which is why it was