Why We Have Dropped The Atomic Bombing Persuasive Essay

Improved Essays
Dropping the Bombs

“We would have kept on fighting until all Japanese were killed, but we would not have been defeated”. This quotes, analyzed by theatlantic.com comes from a high ranking Japanese Army officer while being interrogated about what how he thought the war would have ended if the bombs had not been dropped. The Japanese Fanatical leaders were willing to have their entire population fight to the end then surrender their homeland. If Truman had not dropped the bombs on Japan the only differences in the war would be more deaths American and Japanese deaths and that the civilians killed in the atomic blast would have been replaced with continued fire-bombings. The Japanese Fanatical high command made it impossible for the Allies to reach a peaceful solution to the end of the war. The Americans not only sent peace offers to Japan before and after the first Atomic bombing. Both proposals were ignored by the Japanese government. The Japanese were so radicalized that soldiers were forced to commit suicide rather than surrender. Not only did they force their own soldiers to commit suicide, but they also murdered 6,000,000 Chinese, Indonesians, Koreans, Filipinos, Indochinese and American and British
…show more content…
These people neglect the fact that fire-bombings against Japan were just as destructive, if not more destructive then the atomic strikes. A fire-bombing is were explosive are replaced by an incendiary device. The fire-bombings were especially effective against Japan because their cities were made almost purely of wood and paper, giving them the nickname “paper cities”. The fire-bombing of Tokyo killed 100,000 civilians and devastated the city. This is 20,000 people more than the bombing of and all of it’s effects of Nagasaki. Fire-bombing’s not only destroyed the area that they were dropped in, but they spread throughout the cities destroying

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    With over 200,000 casualties due to his mindset, he failed to account for the other opportunities he had to guarantee America’s success in the war. Other alternatives that could have been substituted for the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki include receiving assistance from the Soviet Union, intensifying existing war strategies and compromising on Japan’s capitulation. With all these in mind, President Truman had no right to put atomic bombs to use on the Japanese population. It is a shame that Harry Truman missed all these opportunities to end World War Two earlier than it did just because he saw it more fit to drop atomic bombs on a civilian population. This does not justify his actions though as mankind can never unseal the great magnitude of nuclear…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Document K Secretary of War Henry Stinson says clearly, “The decision to use the atomic bomb was a decision that brought death to over a hundred thousand Japanese… But this deliberate, premeditated destruction was our least abhorrent alternative”. America had been bombing civilian and industrial cities for almost a year which alone caused many more deaths than the bombs. Also, the operation to invade the Japanese mainland would have ended in a bloodbath of millions of civilian deaths including those in Hiroshima and Nagasaki because the Americans had already planned to bomb those industrial cities months before. It was fair for the Japanese to fear occupation but anyone could tell that the germans and the americans were some of the nicest…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 6, 1945, in response to World War II and Japan’s vicious attacks on the U.S., the United States launched the atomic bomb “Little Boy” on the city of Hiroshima, Japan. 80,000 people died, and sixty percent of the city was destroyed. Three days later, a second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, in which killed 70,000 people instantaneously and many more in the following weeks. These atomic bombs resulted in pure destruction and chaos for Japan and its people. Although the atomic bombs destroyed part of Japan and took many lives with them, the dropping of the atomic bombs were justified because the U.S. aimed for the complete and utter destruction of Japan and Japan remained a major threat that needed to be eliminated.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States tried diplomacy but they rejected the peace treaty. So without trying to make peace again and trying to make sure that there would be no more American deaths, on August 6, 1945 Hiroshima was bombed killing around 80,000 people then 3 days later on August 9, 1945 Nagasaki was bombed killing around 40,000 people. The bombing of Japan had many negative affects on the country. The bomb killed lot’s of innocent people that should not have died, it also made Japan fear us a lot and made them surrender ending the war. Japan had tried to partner with the Soviet Union to go against the United States, but, the Soviet Union had already partnered with the United States.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In fact, an atomic bomb is destructive to the Japanese people and Japanese military and government mental attack. Drop two atomic bomb, it was not represents to be as the official enemy, at the same time, also broke for the successive victory. Only this bombing, Japanese are aware of their country just ordinary small…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    " On the other hand, the United States’ decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was a military measure to ensure that Japan would fully surrender. In Document H titled, Radio Address, Harry S Truman, President Truman stated, “We have used it in order to shorten the agony of war, in order to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans.” He stated that the U.S had used the atomic bombs to end the war quickly and to save more American lives. However, as said by General HH Arnold, the Japanese were already on the verge of collapse.” This meant that even if the bombs weren’t used, then Japan still would have…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second World War was a significant time period in World history and it is interesting to expand knowledge on the subject matter. Paul Kennedy’s main focus was to venture away from previous publications of World War Two and provide the reader with information about middle class people and technologies that contributed to the termination of the war from 1943 to roughly July of 1944. Most publications only will focus on names of important military generals and large scale battles such as the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and in return, D Day. He believes that without certain technologies and motions made by the lesser known contributors, the war would have continued on for many years after 1945. The book is a publication of what mattered…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tens of thousands were killed in the bombing, naming it inhumane. The bomb’s purpose was not to harm innocent people, its purpose was to first get the Japanese government to surrender, if didn’t surrender then attack cities that help create war material. Innocent lives could have been saved if they evacuated the cities as warned. The dropping of the two atomic bombs saved millions of lives of Americans and the lives of Japaneses. The Japanese government plan was to invade America in a land invasion, causing up to 5 to 10 million casualties of Japanese fighters.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is astounding. We seem to emphasize to much how so many people died due to the bombings, yet we are looking at a fraction of the number of civilians who died, many of which were not even fighting on the same side as Japan. Japan killed more civilians than the US ever did; and yet we speak of Japan as though it were a helpless country who were the only nation to suffer so severely, the only nation worth remembering because of the people who died ending the…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Document G shows a picture of the Hiroshima bomb and it states that the mushroom cloud made from the bomb in ten minutes was above 60,000 feet high. A good point to look at is that the fire-bombing in Tokyo killed more people than the Hiroshima bomb. Why was there not an outcry after the Tokyo bombing? People in Japan didn’t cry out after the Tokyo bombing because they were probably already finding a better way to get revenge than the atomic bomb we had.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Given what knowledge that President Harry S. Truman had at the time I would have still dropped the bomb on Hiroshima. We had been bombing Japanese cities as early in the war as 1942. In 1945 we firebombed Tokyo killing more 80,000 people. In response to this Truman remarked, “Despite their heavy losses at Okinawa and the firebombing of Tokyo, the Japanese refused to surrender. The saturation bombing of Japan took much fiercer tolls and wrought far and away more havoc than the atomic bomb.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine loud crashes and destruction all happening in a single second, causing your world to blur in one moment, did you know before that you were about to suffer the worst of all types of pain? The lives of your family were beyond what you could do, they laid motionless and few ashes remain of a few people. That’s how many innocent lives would live today if we had never taken these Atomic bombs seriously. Atomic bombs have been created but only legalized in wars because they are so dangerous to all people, one mistake, and BOOM. Scientists should not continue to test and create atomic bombs because of the lack of safety, the many lives that could be spared, and the results that lay of the bomb.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The nuclear attack of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not justifiable. Due to the fact that the Japanese government was already in the verge of surrendering to the American government.. Also the nuclear bombing was used for several causes, one of which was to cause fear to both the Japanese and Soviet governments. Finally, the bombing of both major cities in Japan caused many deaths, which were not strategic, nor useful towards the war.…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Essay

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This horrific bomb showed the world the true power of the atomic bomb and its horrible aftermath. Most critics argues that the two atomic bombs, Little Boy and Fat Man, that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki by the United States wasn’t necessary. America simply wanted either to show off their power to the world or to get even for Pearl Harbor. Whatever the reason, the devastation from those bombs were so immense that Japan surrendered just a few days after the bombing. Whole cities were wiped out, thousands died instantaneously, and thousands more were victims of radioactive…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Was the U.S justified in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second World War? Discuss the benefits and costs that it resulted.” 1. Introduction During World War Two, the U.S dropped two atomic bombs on the cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, causing high death rates upon the Japanese. Many people may argue that the bombings were devastating and have had a dreadful effect on people’s lives.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays