Why Was World War 2 Be Considered A Good War?

Obviously, Mythmaking and the War to me was an interesting reading I thought was good but also upsetting due to the facts that it discussed. If World War II was considered to be a good war then what would be considered a bad war? War is war I think, and no matter how it is put. How can a war be considered to be a good war. In war goos soldiers are lost on a daily basis and they aren’t not the only causalities that are lost. Among the causalities are the innocent that get caught in between the lines of the soldiers at war. This also leads me to one things that I found upsetting. Which was when the death toll of Americans was compared to other soldiers of other countries. Are causalities were at a high rate but were dwarfed by others such as being compared to the Japanese who lost 2.3 million and the Germans with a 5.6 million. This gave me the feeling that the body count was being taking into account and the ones who lost more were the ones that were a part of the bad war. Was it because Americans didn’t have as much causalities as the others that it was considered to be a good war? Nevertheless its war and don’t think any war should be considered a good or bad war. In my opinion whether the Americans lost the war or won the war, Americans lives were …show more content…
His goals were set on world domination and from what my understanding is he got pretty darn close to what he wanted to achieve during World War II. So when Hitler was compared to Saddam Hussein they are similar in the aspects of being dictators. They did what dictators do and that is to fulfill their greedy needs and it’s what they did that started wars for others that needed to stand up to fight for their freedom. This is another fact that upset me in the reading which was going to war and in war lives are lost. It’s those lives that should be remember for what they did and how they died, as well what they died