Why Was Charles Second Wrong

Improved Essays
Charles II (1630-1685) was King of England, Scotland and Ireland between 1660 and 1685. He was the son of the executed king Charles I. Charles I lost the second civil war, between the ‘royals’ and the long parliament. The leader of the parliament, in the civil war, was Oliver Cromwell. So, he came in power short after the execution of Charles the I. Cromwell dismantled the pulicchurch and he chose a strict and sober new course. For example, theathers were forbidden and adultery was punishable by death. However, after his death in 1658, there was nobody that was able to follow the same course as he did. It looked like, at that time, that there was no other option, but to restore the monarchy. So it happened; in 1660, Charles II became king; the monarchy was restored. …show more content…
In 1665 there was a pestilence in London. A year later, the great fire of London took place. Yet another year later, England lost the Second Anglo-Dutch war. A humiliation for Charles, because the flagship, the Royal Charles, was captured by the Dutch. The brother of Charles II, James II, was held responsible, because he was the admiral. That’s why he was not that popular, so many things went wrong. Not only his action made him unpopular, his lifestyle too, because his lifestyle was excessive. It is no wonder that the people and the parliament were not that pleased with king Charles , in his beginning

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Oliver Cromwell is an important figure in English history as he held a unique position of ruling as ‘Lord Protector’ instead of a monarch. This could result in Cromwell being perceived as a military dictator because the legality of his rule could be questioned. In addition to this he could be seen as an opportunist for military power because his increase in status was due to his role in the army in the First and Second English Civil Wars from 1642 to 1649 and he rose to prominence after the execution and abolition of monarchy on the 30th of January 1649. However, Cromwell not being part of the traditional constitution does not mean he should be viewed as a military dictator. The first section of this essay will portray how Cromwell in terms…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    During the late 1600’s England was going through a power struggle of who was going to be appointed the next King of England after the death of Charles II. In the events of 1688 and 1689 known as the Glorious Revolution, Mary and Prince William of Orange took the throne instead of James II who was the brother of Charles. Those events resulted on heated arguments between the proponents and the opponents of those events. One of the people who publicly supported James II legitimacy to the throne was Thomas Cartwright. Thomas Cartwright was a bishop of the Church of England and he was a big supporter of the divine right of Kings.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Was Cromwell Dbq

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages

    providence hath destroyed and laid in the dust.’ But another reason is important to mention; indeed Cromwell was as we stated before an important military figure and the army which he described as ‘the militants as the core of those who were God’s people’ was his costly way to control people disagreeing with his government, so it was important for him to be in good terms with the head of the army, that is to say John Lambert, John Disbrowe and Charles Fleetwood. When Cromwell said he was ready to accept to be crowned King, they threatened to resign. He then had no other choice than to refuse the offer of the Parliament and he kept his title of Lord Protector. Instead, he took powers from the Council to be able to name his successor and declare…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the seventeenth century the political situation was very critical and complicated, the struggle between the political powers specially the struggle between the cavaliers and the roundheads was very severe. But sure am with the roundheads, am so convinced with their point of view; because when James I and his son Charles I, they both believed in divine right and wanted to rule as an absolute monarch so his view caused conflicts with the parliament, as Charles began expanding power, he asked for money but the parliament didn’t grant it to him until he signs the petition of right which limited the king’s power When they refused to give him the money again after signing the document, he dismissed the parliament, and decided to rule on his…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1625-88 Transformation

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages

    To a certain extent it can be argued that there was little to no change in the years 1625 – 88, however when compared to society in years’ prior there is a significant transformation in many different elements of society during 1625-1688. There is some limited evidence to support the view that there was little to no transformation to society in years 1625-88. Firstly, though the growth of population had reached its peak during the mid-17th century, this growth of the population had been gradually occurring since the country was wiped out by the plague in the 14th century. In addition, one third of the population was poor and though this could be seen as a massive change from prior years, these numbers were similar to the numbers of the poor…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    All eyes were on England and their colonies in the mid to late 1700’s. Other countries were watching the escalating tensions between the British Colonies and their mother country. To have the audacity to completely mount a rebellion was unheard of, although, the Colonists were left with no choice. England’s actions were radical and disrespectful at the least, and without them, there would not have been a revolution. England brought the revolution upon themselves, by enforcing the Currency Act, the Intolerable Acts and by fighting in the battles of Lexington and Concord.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Anne Hutchinson Dbq

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Anne Hutchinson- she disagreed with most ministers in New England that thought that good deeds were how to reach salvation. her idea was that one has to ignore the fake prophets of someone’s behavior to see the inside of them and to find salvation. with only two from all the colonies ministers being saved, she influenced people to question the qualifications of them. these followers were called Antinomians, taking up half of people in Massachusetts Bay. her and all her followers were unfortunately banished by John Winthrop Third Anglo-Powhatan War- lasting from 1644 until 1646, this war was caused but the attack of powhatan warriors on Virginians.…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Influence on Government Before The United States became a free country, it was under the rule of Great Britain. The king of Great Britain was a tyrant, he mistreated the people in the colonies. He would raise taxes on the colonies to pay a war debt that Britain was in. He would charge people for random crimes in an unfair trial. The people had enough of the king’s tyrant ways and sent the king the Declaration of Independence.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Compare American and French revolution, and then determine if the American and French Revolution share the same fundamental ideological ideals? Both the American Revolution and French Revolution were developed around the enlightenment ideals (liberty, freedom etc.) that understood the idea of natural rights and equality. However with these revolutions based on such ideological ideas, it becomes clear compare them, that people involved in these revolutions felt the need to be free from oppressive and dictatorial rule of the monarchs and therefore live independent from such dictatorial forces.…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The non-Indian population grew exponentially in the 1700’s throughout America. Europeans from many countries continued to transplant their lives into the colonies, bringing with them their cultures, religions, family values, and their need for prosperity. Many came to America for asylum, to escape religious persecution back home from the grasp of the Catholic Church. Turmoil also plagued England, which brought about the English Civil War in 1642 between the King and his supporters fighting against the Parliament forces who (were mostly Puritans) organized a military force to overthrow and behead the monarch 7 years later (Brinkley, 2012, p. 50). New colonies were being established with settlers moving further south into the Carolinas and…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In England, the support of Parliament was important to Monarchs. The Acts of Supremacy, in 1534, recognized Henry VII as the Supreme Head of the Church of England. King James tried to reestablish an absolute monarchy and as result a Civil War broke out in 1642. Oliver Cromwell come out victorious in the war, sets up dictatorship, and would rule until his death in 1658. In 1685, James II becomes King and names Catholics to high positions in government.…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the time of the 1760s and 1770s the talk of freedom was on the tongues of many in the colonies. In the eyes of a great deal of freedom hungry people, the New World was the image of a haven where people could escape to find what they had been searching for. Many found freedom here, but it came at a costly price. One of the most well known and controversial events during the era of the American Revolution was The Boston Massacre. Many other predicaments came prior to this happening that placed the British soldiers in Boston for The Boston Massacre to take place.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter the Great vs. Louis XIV There has yet to be a king in history that is without fault, that has no failures. In the early 1600’s to the late 1600’s two kings arose, one from Russia and one from France. Peter the Great was from Russia, while Louis XIV was from France. While both of these rulers had obstacles, they both climbed over them and managed to get back on their feet and they made their rule historical. Both Peter the Great and Louis XIV had many goals that they wanted to achieve, they both had many accomplishments and they both had many failures.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Glorious Revolution of 1688, was caused by the removal of King James II of England, who was a Catholic, by Parliament. To prove this, this paper will provide information as to why King James II was removed. As evidence, this paper will discuss details of what was going on in England and British North America during this time, and what the outcome of this removal brought about. King James II of England converted to Catholicism in 1676, and during the next decade he made many efforts to bring Catholics into high political offices in England.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He centralized the monarchy’s power around him and nobody had any political influence. He easily handled the difficulties he faced from the nobles by pacifying the nobility. King Louis XIV of France was undoubtedly the best absolute monarch…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays