Why Was Andrew Jackson Controversial

1230 Words 5 Pages
The fierce election of 1828, featured former president John Quincy Adams against the war hero Andrew Jackson. Jackson felt cheated due to the "corrupt bargain" during the election of 1824,and has decided to take one more shot at presidency. Jackson, the candidate who gained popular support from both the West and South, arrived victorious at the conclusion to the election of 1828. Despite his political campaign, some historians regard Jackson 's presidency as "great," which in terms places him among with the top tier of American presidents. Andrew Jackson, the seventh president, in my opinion doesn 't fit on that magnitude of placement. His presidential reputation is arguably controversial, and one that 's is difficult to simply address. In …show more content…
He can be describe as a short tempered leader, who was constantly involved in duels. Jackson in many occasions, would challenge people out of anger. In general, his fierce temper isn 't one of his positive factor. His early experiences of being in an orphan at a young age, and the participation in the revolutionary war may have effected this. His short temperament affected his presidency, in a way damaging the image of a "great" leader. Adding on to the traits of Jackson, he was more in flavor of brawling and fighting than actually school subjects. The result of this was that he was always rough in his grammar and commonly committing spelling errors in a formal letter. With this aggressive personality, he 's sometime has trouble keeping his cool, which is why I gave a "C" on his overall …show more content…
He described the idea of banks as "money monster," because like a business it controlled values of gold and silver. The bank was more of a private institutions, which held power over political affairs. These didn 't benefit the mass of people, as much as the elite investors. Jackson view the bank as a instrument to subvert democracy. The "bank war" surfaced when a recharter of the Bank of United States was vetoed by Jackson. He claimed that the monopolistic bank was unconstitutional, unlike the Supreme Court who stated it to be constitutional. This farther confuses the idea of determining what is constitution and is not. He vetoed the bank, because in his opinion it harmed the nation. The rejection of a national bank, left the pet banks in charge holding federal funds. This resulted in a disaster because of the fluctuations of value varying from banks. Jackson later passed Specie Circular a decree which required states to hard metallic currency. This left decision left upcoming economic damages , which led to the Panic of 1837. The issue collapsed farther crushing the economy and this is why I decided to give Jackson a

Related Documents