Why The 'Separation Of Powers' Important Today

Improved Essays
Why is the “Separation of Powers” Important Today? Why is the separation of powers important today? The separation of powers is to make sure that not one power is more powerful than the other by all the powers to keep each other in check. The term “separation of powers” originates to Baron de Montesquieu, a French Enlightenment philosopher. History shows that when one group with the same ideology is in power, tyranny and mass slaughter soon follow. There was still the option of the judicial branch saying the law was unconstitutional, but, as human nature is not constant, a traditionally Conservative judge, Chief Justice John Roberts voted in favor of the bill, surprising many.
There are many different ways to separate the powers of a government.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This quote from James Madison declares that the purpose for separation of powers is to make sure that not one person will hold too much power, no matter it be to make laws and enforce them, enforce law and explain them, or any combination of the three. If someone were to have power in more than one field, they would be classified as a tyrant. This is why today, we do not let someone in legislative, executive, and judicial at the same time because no matter what kind of government, a tyrant can still exist within that government. To make sure that no one person can be a part of more than one branch, Articles 1, 2, and 3 state the position of each branch. Article one, Section one gives the legislative power to congress.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the constitutional convention, the federalist and the anti-federalist went head to head trying to create new laws for government. Many articles were written by James Madison; these articles were the federalist papers. Within these paper, Madison outlines that the constitution protects against tyranny by dividing power between state and government, by separating government into branches, having a checks and balances system, and having equal state representation among the states. In document A, James Madison states that power is “First divided between two distinct governments, state and federal.” This describes the idea of federalism, where state and federal governments share power; powers like declaring war and printing money belong…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Separation of powers along with checks and balances correlated together to form the balance that the founding fathers where looking forward to. The Federalist Papers were written by three men, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay. However, Alexander Hamilton and James Madison were the two main ones that I wanted to mention since their point of view reflected on the topic of separation of power. It is a document that brought three men together in order to work things in order to make the nation a well nation compare to others. The three branches are spread out to prevent one from gaining too much power.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fundamental truth of separation of powers and checks and balances is that they prevent the government from gaining too much power which could potentially lead to a tyranny. Checks and balances help keep separation of powers by giving each branch specific powers that can check the other branch's actions. These checks and balances allow the branches to have limited power while maintaining the clear separation of powers into three branches and have ultimately created a limited/balanced form of government. Balance is described as an even distribution of weight enabling someone or something to remain upright and steady. The system of separation of powers distributes the government's power into three even branches while checks and balances allows these branches to stay even in power and prevent the branches from gaining too much power, overall enabling the government to stay upright and perform its duties to the people properly.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Separation of powers defend against tyranny by separating the three branches, legislative, executive, judicial. They should be extremely separate, Madison said in a federalist paper that, “Liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct” (Doc B). Some examples that they are separate is that they all have different jobs, Congress makes laws, the president and his cabinet enforce them, and the justices of the supreme court interpret them. They are only supposed to do their job, not the other branches. You cannot have the president fire judges because they disagree, it would lead to politics influencing the cases.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Separation of Power To ensure no person in the government has too much power. The government is separated into three branches, the congress, executive, and judicial branch. Each branch has different power, duties, responsibilities, and limitation.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Separation of Power limits government by not giving any branch in government complete control…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was an another enlightenment thinker. Montesquieu was the one who developed the separation of power. He believed this would help to divide the power amongst everyone, so that one person would not rule. Montesquieu came up with three branches, so that not only a few people would maintain the power. The Executive, Judicial, and Legislative branch.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Charles de Montesquieu was the first to demonstrate the separation of powers in his work L’Esprit des Lois (the Spirit of the Laws) in 1748, he introduced the theory of the separation of powers as a baseline principle (Bondy, 1896). Legal power is separated between those who make laws, those who apply the laws and those who adjudicate on matters of compliance of law. The Judiciary also ensures that the laws are consistent with the powers given to the legislature or executive in accordance with the Constitution. This principle ensures that we are ruled by laws and not the exercise of unchecked executive power. The phrase “power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely” has become a truism as the concentration of powers in one branch is prone to errors (Civilization of the Political System,…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Constitution Dbq Analysis

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Another time we see separation of powers is in the venn diagram in document 6. It shows the split between powers given to government and powers given to the states. The central governments and the state governments have their own powers but they also share powers. For example, one of powers given to the government is to regulate trade, while on the other hand one of the powers given to the states is to set up local governments and hold elections.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So how the separation of powers worked was the government was split into 3 branches; The executive (The president and “workers”), Legislature (The senate and house of representatives) and the Judicial branch (Supreme court and lower courts.) So checks and balances “act” was built so that no branch would become to powerful. So each one branch is basically watched by the other two. So for example; The president (the “executive branch”) can veto laws by congress. Congress can override the veto by a 2/3rds vote.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American Political System

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The separation of powers, which was intended as a way to strengthen each of the three governmental bodies and prevent tyrannical rule had become unbalanced. Without a serious change to the separation of powers, the legislature would become an unstoppable force, or as Thomas Jefferson noted, “173 despots … just as oppressive as one” (Ellis,…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thus, the separation of powers as seen can be fundamental in keeping the government in check. This stops there from being the same people holding power in many parts of the government, and thus abusing power. As seen separations of power is necessary to protect from abuse of power from the government, and everyday people’s rights, as well as to make sure that there is no corruption with the people in power and to make sure they are doing their…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A philosopher by the name of Montesquieu, “argued for a separation of powers, with political power divided among different classes and legal estates holding unequal rights and privileges” (McKay, 563). His idea on the separation of powers influenced the constitution of France in…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The ‘separation of powers’ is a doctrine that has caused much debate through the centuries, and although it is difficult to find its exact origins, it is possible to distinguish a basic separation of powers doctrine from the writings of Greek philosopher Aristotle. He remarked that a constitution must have three elements to be effective. The three are, first the deliberative, which discusses everything of common importance; second, the officials…; and third, the judicial element. The English political theorist, John Locke, conceived a similar idea about the different types of power.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays