Why The Government Shouldnt Have Control Over The Internet

Improved Essays
"Why the Government Shouldn't Have Control Over the Internet I don't think that the Federal Government has the right to go through our social media, wiretap us, or restrict what we can or can_Ñét see. We have our First Amendment right to say what we feel online and look up what we want to see without having the Government only give us some of the information. If the Government can monitor what we can or can_Ñét see, then what stops them from giving us one-sided information. They could ban us from finding liberal sided sources and only give us conservative sided sources. This would basically block the reporters freedom of speech on these sites. One advantage to the Government monitoring internet sites is they would be able to know who visited a terrorist site and this would help the Government stop an attack like 911. They would be able to know if they went on various sites planning an attack and then stop the attack before it happened. At a more local level this would be useful if a child went missing. They could look at sites the child visited and then be able to pinpoint who they were talking to and hopefully find the child. …show more content…
The Fourth Amendments states, _ÑÒThe right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized._Ñù. This Amendment states that the Government has to have probable cause if they want to search through anything we own. If the Government gains access to our internet searches it would be in violation of this

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    This directly goes against the fourth amendment in the bill of rights of the United States. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) was passed in nineteen seventy eight. The United States government used to use FISA and acts like FISA to spy on other nations governments and citizens, the difference with the Patriot Act is, they are spying on their own citizens. “The provisions of Section two hundred and thirteen of the Patriot Act allow federal searches to be conducted and delayed notice to be given to the subject. The subject of the search may never be given notice that a search was conducted if criminal proceedings are not initiated after the search” (the Patriot Act).…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the horrific events of September 11 2001, the Congress has passed the Patriot Act and approved by the Senate and the House of Representatives. But on October 26, when the President Bush signed the Act, no House of Representatives or the Senate reports this. The extensive terrorist attack may be decreased, but the Patriot Act still have false charge and still be accused of dangerous rise of the government surveillance. It’s true that the Patriot Act has acted to violate privacy expectations and suspect regular Americans citizens. “It violates the privacy of millions of innocent people” (source 1).…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “The Internet is a surveillance state”, which appeared on CNN.com on March 16, 2013, Bruce Schneier claims the government can see our every move on the internet. He goes on to state, “Whether we admit it to ourselves or not, whether we like it or not, we’re being tracked at all times.” (55). He uses specific and persuasive examples from his work experience to share his thoughts and beliefs on a subject that not everyone is aware of, but the ones who do are usually chilled by it. This paper will analyze Schneier’s article from his view as an American security technologist, cryptologist, and author of “Liars and authors:…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    H.R. 5800/S. 2981- Secure Data Act of 2014 The United States Constitution under the Fourth Amendment ensures our right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, and by extension has been interpreted to protect our right of privacy. The Fourth Amendment states: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (The Charters of Freedom). There has been much controversy as to what is considered to be protected under constitutional law relating to one’s right of privacy. Although a reasonable right to privacy is not explicitly stated in the Constitution, this particular right has developed into a civil liberty protected by the Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth amendments.…

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Moot Court Case

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    DAVID FALLSBAUER’S RIGHTS UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT WERE VIOLATED BY THE POLICE OFFICERS, BECAUSE WHEN FACED WITH AMBIGUITY REGARDING THE A THIRD PARTY’S CONSENT TO SEARCH THEY FAILED TO MAKE A FURTHER INQUIRY. BY DOING SO, THE OFFICERS VIOLATED DAVID’S RIGHT TO PRIVACY. The primary question before this Court is whether police officers must make a further inquiry when faced with an ambiguity regarding a third party’s consent to search. The Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals have taken different views when deciding the actions a police officer must take when faced with an ambiguity pertaining to third party consent. It is crucial to our society that a person’s right to privacy is protected and able to be exercised.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the United States first formed, James Madison wrote the Bill of Rights as laws to follow throughout time. The Fourth Amendment is one of the most important of the amendments because it permits people to the privacy that they are entitled to. “The Constitution’s Fourth Amendment is inarguably set in stone in declaring that in the United States “no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause.” (Does the Government Actually Understand the 4th Amendment, 2013.) Going alongside this law, it states the fact that the government and law enforcement cannot obtain citizens’ information or belongings without a warrant, but with all of the new technology that is coming out, this law is being broken.…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Americans had experienced this privacy invasion with the British many times. Before the revolution, British claimed the authority to issue Writs of Assistance allowing officials to enter private homes in search for evidence of smuggling. Writs of Assistance never expired and were transferable. The federalists violate the fourth amendment on a daily basis. When federal agency collects our electric data, emails, phone calls, and other private information, that violates this amendment, if they don’t have a legitimate reason.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment: Search and Seizure In the Fourth Amendment, it states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated” (Cornell University of Law). The Fourth Amendment states its main idea in this statement and through it American citizens and their belongings and records are protected from surveillance, searches, and seizures. However, in today’s digital world government officials have used what could be called an unconstitutional approach to the Fourth Amendment, causing them to monitor phone conversations. There have also been instances where personal records have been gained by law enforcement without any relevant reason.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This private information includes phone records, banking statements, and medical reports. Though the Supreme Court has supported the Patriot Act, the law still seems to conflict with parts of the Constitution and infringe upon basic human rights of an individual. The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures unless there is a…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Domestic Wiretapping and Surveillance without a court order. Civilized human beings tend to discuss personal private information with each other everyday. Whether they want the information to be known or not by other people is out of their control. People conduct phone calls and texts messages with each other day in and day out. People assume that these are private one-on-one conversations with each other, but little do they know that there is a third party monitoring their conversations.…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fourth Amendment Privacy

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Even though the United States Constitution does not outright give American citizens the express right to privacy, many amendments contain the protection of certain privacies, more specifically the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments. The Fourteenth Amendment has a very broad claim, stating that “No State shall… deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” The word “liberty” in this statement singlehandedly guarantees this wide sense of privacy to American citizens, as shown through countless amounts of court cases decided based upon this clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In the past few decades, privacy rights are often debated closely relating to technology as new methods of hacking,…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Self-contained intrusions not performing in the color of governmental authority are exempt from the Fourth Amendment. (Barry Friedman and Orin Kerr, n.d) What Does the Fourth Amendment Protect? Searches…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Introduction The Fourth Amendment states that “the rights of the people to be secured in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable search and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause supported, by the oath of affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.” This simply means in laments terms that every US citizens is entitled and promised protections against personal and property invasion as well as entitled to be inform of the nature of the search and detailed what place and things are subject to be searched. The fourth amendments also lays out a requirement that a warrant must be obtained and must be done so only…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a finite line between national security and the privacy of innocent Americans in their day to day lives. The right to have privacy was provided to people when it was installed in the 4th amendment to the constitution. Although the U.S. Government has been stretching out this basic right and invading the privacy right that every American has. The government should not be allowed to freely use surveillance programs to watch over innocent people 's every move. Stated in the 4th amendment there is the right for people “to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most critics of surveillance argue about how it is an abuse of power, a violation of people 's privacy, and most importantly, unconstitutional, while proponents of surveillance claim the benefit of surveillance is a reduction in the probability of high-cost events such as terrorism. Government surveillance programs, when conducted in controlled situations and closely audited by independent organizations, do not directly harm innocent civilians, especially when they benefit the safety of the general public. Surveillance, by definition, is the act of carefully watching someone or something especially in order to prevent or detect a crime. If that definition was used when discussing the issue of government surveillance, most public safety activities,…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays