Why The Death Penalty Should Be Abolished

Improved Essays
“When can we learn by reason[,] judgement[,] understanding and faith that all life is worth saving, and mercy is the highest attribute?” asked Clarence Darrow at the trial for Leopold and Loeb. This was his hope for the country. Darrow was strongly opposed to the death penalty and through his argument was able to get Leopold and Loeb life without parole instead of death. The death penalty is wrong and is against human nature. Capital punishment in the U.S. should be abolished because we have no right to decide someone's fate, only God should decide, the convicts on death row are just piling up and the thought of punishment does not prevent someone from committing a crime.
Think about a person, any human being. It could be the person
…show more content…
It takes half of a lifetime for some convicts to reach their execution date. Others die waiting for execution. In Florida, it would take one hundred and seventy five years to clear out their death row inmates, that is without adding more. California has the highest number of convicts on death row and seven hundred and fifty of them have not made an appeal because of an underfunded defense budget. Moving faster runs the risk of executing the wrong person as there have been one hundred and fifty people on death row found innocent after years of …show more content…
They have not considered that a lot of people on death row do not believe that they have done wrong. The death penalty does not deter people from committing murder. The New York Times did a study that show the murder rates rose and fell almost symmetrically between states with and without capital punishment . Also murder rates in states with the death penalty were forty-eight to one hundred and one percent higher. This proves that capital punishment is ineffective. Others may believe that the death of a convicted murderer might ease the sorrow on the family of the victim. Yet killing the killer will not bring back the victim. I go back to the Leopold and Loeb case for my final argument. They committed the crime because they believed that they had the “perfect crime.” They had no fear of the death penalty and this shocked the world. Those who support the death penalty often say that the states spent thousands of dollars a year on those with life without parole. States also spend millions on buying and developing equipment to execute people. The money used to fund capital punishment could be put to use to rehabilitate criminals and release them back into society. Punishment is meant to discipline, but you cannot discipline a person if they are

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The morality of the death penalty has long been, and still is a controversial topic in the United States. People have been debating for centuries whether or not this form of punishment should exist. Those supporting it have claimed that the death penalty acts as a deterrent of future crimes. On the other hand, those against it have disproved this claim. Studies show that capital punishment should not be used in the United States, since it does not act as a deterrent, certain groups are more likely to be sentenced to death, and it does not offer closure for families.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the death penalty comes the expense of it. Why should the Department of criminal justice pay millions of dollars on one execution when the person who will be executed more than likely didn’t spend any money on the person that they killed? The justice departments have been using the defense that the death penalty will help to cut back on crime and use it as a deterrent effect, but in reality it does little to actually change the amount of crimes that are being committed. The book, Death Penalty in America: Current Controversies talks about how one of politicians main focuses now when discussing crime and the effects of it on the community is that they “worry about appearing soft on crime”. When determining if the death penalty is an efficient…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is only still living due to the misconceptions and can only be put away for good if the US citizens show their distaste for the barbaric punishment. Instead the US is spending millions of unnecessary dollars on executions and believing it deters crime which is also false (OADP). Reggie Clemons lost many years of his life due to the grueling system of death row and prison and the citizens of the US paid for it…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There is absolutely no evidence, out of thousands of statistics, that proves that capital punishment deters crime. In fact, the opposite is true. Studies show that the crime rates in states without the death penalty are lower than crime rates in states with capital punishment (Issitt and Newton 4). Additionally, psychiatrists say that capital punishment may further entice psychopaths to commit crimes because they can feel powerful from testing the limits of the law and its highest penalty (Cuomo 2). In “The Death Penalty Does Not Deter Crime” by Jack Weil, an anecdote is given that further proves that killers are more tempted by the death penalty.…

    • 1788 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Executing a criminal through death penalty costs much more money than by just simply putting them in jail for the rest of their life. The State’s economy is currently under the debt of $18 trillion…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hammurabi Punishment

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The death penalty continues to be a hot topic of debate around the United States. There are those who debate whether the death penalty should be abolished and there are those who affirm or agree with the death penalty. There are those who say it is morally wrong to have the death penalty imposed while others say “an eye for an eye.” While these may be two of the biggest arguments against the death penalty there are also ones that state that the death penalty does not deter criminals from committing the same crime while several other studies show that it is a suitable deterrence for crime. Several states have already abolished the death penalty.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The problem is, some sentenced to death row are spending years awaiting the death sentence to be carried out. According to The Economist,…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is just a very lengthy process in which the peoples tax money is going towards and could be going to better places. Millions of dollars in tax money are wasted on the death penalty and it should be going towards health programs and construction for our cities. For example, a man with life without parole costs one million dollars for fifty years. Even though that person may take up space in a prison, the state is saving money and that tax money can be put to better use. The second con to the death penalty is irreversible mistakes.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Whilst some think that the death penalty is a fair sanction, it is an inequitable penance because many convicts on death row suffered from prejudiced trials, were mentally-ill, or were wrongfully accused. There have been hundreds of unjustified deaths from the death penalty. In conclusion, the death sentence is an unnecessary form of punishment that advocates the obliteration of human life. There is no proof whatsoever that the death penalty serves as a deterrent to…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    More than thirty-five hundred men and women have received the death penalty sentence in California since 1978 and not one of them has been freed, except those few inmates who were able to prove their righteousness. California could save one billion dollars over the course of five years by replacing capital punishment with a lifetime in prison. California taxpayers pay ninety thousand dollars more per inmate who is on death row each year than on inmates in prison. In 2007, New Jersey banned death penalties in the state. This makes absolute sense because we have progressed as a society through the course of the centuries.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are also many botched executions where the promised quick and painless death has been prolonged for as much as two hours. Getting back to the economic aspect of the death penalty, the fact is it is way to expensive to be practical. It is four times more expensive to defend…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, according to a study done by the Death Penalty Information Center, in 2013 states that did not have the death penalty had a 22% lower murder rate than states with the death penalty. As evidence of this, the death penalty should be changed or abolished to lower crime rates, which would keep some would-be criminals out of jail and off of death row. This cuts down on costs for the state, and by extension, the taxpayers. While many would argue that the possibility of being put on death row would scare many would-be criminals away from committing crimes and murders, due to that fact that it has been proven to have the opposite effect, the death penalty should be taken out of the judicial system to cut costs for state…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The one option that would prolong the life of the death penalty would be to lower the cost. One way this could be done would be to reduce the appeals process. However, one issue with reducing the appeals process is that an innocent person could be executed. Another option that could be used to curb the high cost felt by states is to just use the penalty less, and leave it for only the most severe cases.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They say that it would be cheaper to just put them to death and better our society. They may argue “murder is murder, a person has to pay for the crime that they committed.” However, what many people do not know is it actually costs more to put people to death than it does to keep them in prison for the rest of their lives. According to Forbes, it is 10 times more expensive to kill an inmate than to keep him or her alive. “The annual cost of the death penalty in the state of California is $137 million compared to the cost of lifetime incarceration of 11.5 million” (Erb).…

    • 1772 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As statistics, have shown, it does cost an obscene amount of money to execute a person, however it can help save innocent lives, and there isn’t a price that can be put on that. In closing, if someone has committed a heinous crime and is given the death penalty it should be required for them to see it through. As mentioned earlier, this will allow the family to have closure and potentially deter future offenders. Capital punishment very well could solve more problems than originally…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics