Electoral College Unfair

Improved Essays
In the 2000 presidential election between George Bush and Al Gore, Gore won the popular vote but lost the electoral college; this had only happened four times in history. This brought out a lot of controversy between people who didn’t understand how the electoral college worked. The electoral college is made up of representatives of each state, who vote for the president and vice president. Each representative is voted for by their individual state voters, whom they will represent. Currently, there are 538 total electors, 271 votes needed to win the electoral college. This process of voting has been questioned because, it appears to be unfair to voters, and it doesn’t allow outside American territories (who are American citizens) to vote or …show more content…
This is understandable since, the way the electoral college really works, could seem confusing and appear to be unfair. The representative that is chosen for each state is based on the popular vote of the state. For example, California for the most part is democratic. So, when Obama ran for re-election in 2012, he won California’s popular vote. This means that the representative chosen to vote in the electoral college must represent the popular vote or the values that the state holds. Most of the time this is what happens, but sometimes, like with Al Gore & Bush, they can lose the electoral college because the representative voted differently to the state vote. Unfortunately, this seems unfair but sometimes it could be for the better. Truth is, there are many people who go out and vote for someone or something that they are completely uneducated about. Per say, someone could go out and vote for someone without knowing how that candidate feels about certain education issues, gun control reforms, foreign policy issues etc. The electoral college serves as a backup plan for people who make uneducated votes because, what is popular is not always the best …show more content…
One of the biggest problems, I believe to be of the electoral college is, its discrimination of the outside U.S territories. The process prohibits the U.S. territories from voting in a popular vote or having representatives in the electoral college. Currently, there are about 5 million U.S. citizens who are not allowed to vote because of where they live; this includes: Puerto Rico, Guam, Virgin Islands, American Samoa and Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. In a recent video, John Oliver, of Last Week Tonight with John Oliver, he states, “residents of America 's island territories can 't vote because the Supreme Court found in a series of early 20th century decisions that they belonged to the United States but were "not a part" of the United States. The decisions also found the territories were inhabited by "alien races" who might not be able to understand Anglo-Saxon laws, so the U.S. Constitution didn 't have to apply.” Our constitution guarantees all citizens the civil right to vote; so why do these outside territories gain citizenship and no voice in their government? Technically, the answer to this is because they aren’t a state, just a territory.Unfortunately, the citizens of these territories are

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Many Americans are requesting that the Electoral College be abolished due to inconsistencies, for example: The Electoral College votes are not equally dispersed for each state, or someone could become President by winning only 21.8% of the popular vote, and the swing states vs the safe states which can favor one candidate over the…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Citizens make up the state, so if you do not have citizens you would not have states. Then if we were to get rid of the Electoral College; then the candidates would pay attention to other states more than they do now. They are more worried about the winner take all system that they ignore the state they already know their vote for them. Which disenfranchises voter who supported the losing candidates. This system favors some citizens over others, which denies some people their choice of president.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The popular vote isn’t always the one that decides the election. In the history of the United States four candidates have become president even though they didn’t win the popular vote. George Bush won the 2000 election even though he lost the popular vote to Al Gore who had 48% of the popular votes while Bush only had 47%. However, he received 5 more electoral votes which is how he became president (Kimberling). Since results are based on the number of electoral votes and not the number of popular votes, presidential candidates can still win the election even if the nation voted for the other candidate.…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Negative Effects of the Winner-Take-All Method In the current US election system, citizens do not directly vote for their next president. Instead, a group called the Electoral College carries out that function. Citizens cast their votes and those votes are tallied up by state. Once tallied, the Electors, also known as Representatives, of the states place their votes. Each state has a certain amount of electoral votes.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Electoral College ruins the chances of a president being elected due to the amount of Electoral votes. This puts smaller states at a disadvantage due to the lack of campaigning in a certain state. The only states who even receive a slight bit of consideration when presidents run are the ones with the most votes. Such as Texas, California, Florida and New York. These states are key factors which have a huge effect on what candidate will win the Presidential Election.…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although I do agree with some opinions against the system when they state that it is not an equal manner in which to represent every individual vote in this country. The winner-take-all aspect that most states use prevents diversity and the recognition of the minority of that state. This is a major issue since most states are fastened to one party. On the other hand, I do agree with how the Electoral College prevents the voting of presidents by people who do not really know much about the candidates they are voting for. Sometimes people vote with their emotions, or even sometimes buy into propaganda.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But the winner of the popular vote may end up losing the election, like “Al Gore did in 2000 and Hillary Clinton in 2016. In the 2012 presidential election, Mitt Romney won 48% of the popular vote but only 38% of the electoral vote.” This is because although Americans vote directly for their chosen candidate in the presidential election every 4 years, the president is elected by the institution called the Electoral College. Now for the electoral college, “There are 538 total electors in the Electoral College, who…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All the effort that they went to in order to make sure that the president would not be elected based off of just popular votes would have gone to waste. They would probably fear that uneducated voters would be a large portion of the voter turnout. This may end up resulting in a president who may not have the best qualifications to serve as a leader for the…

    • 1995 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 2000 presidential election, most people were prepared to accept that Al Gore would be the next president even though he would likely lose the popular vote. However, the opposite happened. George Bush won the presidency through a small margin of electoral votes, but had lost the popular vote of the people. This election is an example of how the Electoral College diminishes the importance of the votes of the people. Most people know of the electoral college, they have read about it in their U.S. Government textbooks or have heard it mentioned in a political news broadcast, but some people are unclear on how much power the electoral college possesses; it is the electors who have the power to elect the President of the United States, not…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Voting, defined as an official choice made in an election, usually by ballot, is the go to way for how the United States and other 122 nations handle their democracy. The issue that lies in hand is what occurs when people chose not to vote. This results in lack of support for a government and can lead to the corruption of said government. This has resulted in many nations, such as Australia, to resort to compulsory or mandatory voting. However, mandatory…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays