Arguments Against Pas

Improved Essays
Based on a recent study, “57% of physicians practicing today have received a request for physician-assisted suicide in some form or another” (Back et al). The heated debate has been on whether patients possess the right to die via physician-assisted suicide (PAS). This assisted suicide is for the terminally ill who do not wish to continue their suffering due to their fatal conditions. The debate has very different points of view. One is that suicide should never be the answer despite health conditions due to medical ethics. On the other side, it is believed that people deserve the right to decide at what point and under what conditions they are ready to end their own lives. PAS should be legalized because patients have the right and should …show more content…
While the medical community does try to save and prolong the patient 's life, when is enough, enough? The article “Should Doctors be Allowed” points out that death is also a part of medical treatment. Death is inevitable and health care professional denying PAS are letting their patients continue suffering and harm, which is not in any way helping them. “Emphasizing the importance of the principle of autonomy, quality of life is a very personal opinion. By preventing clients from taking their life, healthcare providers are being paternalistic and imposing their views onto their patients” (de Vocht et al). Medical ethics lie on the base of consent of the patient, as well as discretion, judgment, and experience of the medical physician. Healthcare professionals should be able to make the judgment call to respect the patient 's wishes and put their best interest forward. “Should Doctors be Allowed” concludes that helping them to achieve a calm and peaceful end should be thought of as one of the best treatments for terminally ill patients. Overall, the patient’s wishes should be first and PAS should be legalized because this topic is a highly personal and situational decision, thus should not be deemed as unethical or illegal under …show more content…
PAS gives physicians the opportunity of advantages to dying patients. Legalizing PAS will improve the patient’s environment, as well as giving them the chance to die with dignity and peace. Patients deserve right and should be given the power of what happens to their bodies, after enduring suffering brought upon them from health conditions when nothing else can be done to improve them. Neither legislation nor the medical community should be given the power to decide over a patient 's life when the treatment options no longer exist. This is a very sensitive subject due to the extent of how personal the decision is, thus should not be ruled under legislative

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He stated that a doctor’s job is to “save life when we can, to relieve suffering when we cannot, and never to contribute deliberately to the death of any of our patients.”. He noted that if doctors were also involved in ending a person’s life, it would completely change the relationship between a doctor and their patient. A patient trusts their doctor to do whatever it takes to save their life. Once the aspect of ending life is introduced, a tension between a doctor and their patient will form. A patient can no longer fully trust their doctor.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    People arguing in favor of it cite patient independence, kindness and non-abandonment. They hold that patients ought to be given the right to decide about their own death and to decide the extent of suffering they can cope with. If the patient does not get relief even with the most advanced medical practices, the medical practitioner is duty bound to do all within his limits to eliminate such hardships, even if it involves quickening the dying process provided other treatment options are not acceptable to the patient. In terms of non-abandonment, the physician has to ensure that the dying process goes through responsively by outweighing the other limitations during such trying circumstances. The main arguments given against physician assisted death are the lack of justification of killing, medical practitioner integrity and risks associated with abusing the liberty available to the physician.…

    • 1822 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This would have ultimately led to Dax’s death, but it would have been what the patient wanted. In today’s day and age, patient rights are highly considered in every medical decision. The patient has the right to refuse treatment, even if that action may result in a poor prognosis. This is seen often with dialysis patients. If a dialysis patient chooses to stop going to dialysis, they will ultimately die, but if they do not wish to live that way anymore and refuse to go, healthcare providers cannot force the patient to continue on dialysis and eventually need to help the patient in determining end of life care.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dignity Vs Euthanasia

    • 2009 Words
    • 8 Pages

    With many controversies with it, it may never be fully legal in the world. The terminally ill go through so much pain that it should be allowed for them, only, to end their lives. The loss of dignity is not worth what family members to go through and may bring more sorrow to them having assisted suicide. Just imagining being in the shoes of a terminally ill person it would be hard to know that the time is coming to die. As doctors are making better medicine hopefully these deadly diseases go away, but until then it should be a right to the patients to end it on their terms.…

    • 2009 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Opponents of euthanasia say that euthanasia enhances the power and control of doctors, not patients” (Life Information 2). It would make more sense for the patient to have more power especially since they are the ones with their lives on the line. We should not force people who are suffering to live in misery. The law should allow patients to choose what they believe is best for themselves. “A state 's categorical ban on physician assistance to suicide -- as applied to competent, terminally ill patients who wish to avoid unendurable pain and hasten inevitable death -- substantially interferes with this protected liberty interest and cannot be sustained” (ACLU Amicus Brief in Vacco v. Quill).…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If people have the right to refuse life-saving treatments, then they should also have the right to end their own life. Indeed, while religious opponents disagree because they believe God decides when a person dies, I strongly agree that physician assisted suicide should be legal. This right would allow patients to leave this earth with dignity, save families from haunting memories, and relieve patients from insufferable pain. Nobody wants to die, however, when the time comes we should be able to make our own decision on how we will exit this…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If each patient has the right to refuse any treatment that could prolong his/her life, then the only treatment left to ensure no pain and suffrage is physician assisted-suicide. Each patient should be able to receive as best of an equal treatment as others would. So, if a patient with a terminal illness opts out of treatments that would prolong their life with more pain and less dignifying loss of independence to be treated equally, they should be offered physician assisted-suicide treatment. This treatment would be the best option that would equal other treatments offered to similar patients, but just don 't prolong their life. This also pertains to treating the patient fairly and with respect to the wishes he/she chooses.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Assisted Suicide Cons

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It’s not as if every terminally ill patient is being handed death because they are unwilling to try alternatives. Physician assisted suicide is permanent and because of that the physician has to make sure the patients conditions meet the criteria for even being considered for PAS. The patient has to have a disease that is incurable and will result in a severe amount of suffering. They must understand that there are alternatives for comfort, as well as their prognosis. The physician must see that the patient is suffering undoubtedly and not because they are not receiving the proper comfort care.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If we legalize physician assisted suicide, will our society be willing to treat and aid patients who attempt to commit suicide due to unattended mental health issues? Or will suicide become a norm for future generations? Are we ready to trust our physicians with not only our life but also our death? Although many may argue that physician assisted suicide should be allowed in terminal cases, the possible risks and dangers that come with it are quite alarming. While people should be allowed to end their pain and suffering, we must understand we don’t have the right method to conduct or legalize physician assisted suicides without potentially harming other people along the way.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Assisted Suicide Analysis

    • 1945 Words
    • 8 Pages

    According to CQ Researcher AMA rejects death with dignity because it goes against the AMA code of ethics. The AMA states that: “Physician-assisted suicide is fundamentally incompatible with the physicians role as a healer…” (Karaim, 2013, p. 456). Even though the AMA does not support physicians helping patients end their life, they do however support the removal of life sustaining machines in the end stages of life if the patient indicates that as his or her preference. The life sustaining machines include, but are not limited to, ventilators and respirators that keep the patient alive essentially. The AMA supports the removal of such devices because it allows the patient to take up the risk of dying that is part of the illness they have.…

    • 1945 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays