Mackie's Argument For The Existence Of God

Superior Essays
Every 10 seconds there is a child that dies from hunger. 1 out of 4 women reports sexual harassment in the workplace, if I am a person of color, then i am more likely to go to jail and be discriminated against. If I don 't have a certain religious view, then I can be beheaded, if I am poor, then I am more likely to be marginalized and discriminated against. Why should a five year old child get shot while playing in the playground just because they live in a neighborhood that is dangerous? Why are children forced to join gangs and leave their families, tradition, and culture? There is so much evil and the world and so much hate that we have to live with. Why have a God when all of these evil exist in this world. Is there even a God, if all …show more content…
The ultimate question is that why do we need a God who is all powerful and good, but let’s evil exist in the world, so Mackie concluded that there is no God. To prove his point Mackie has come up with some anticipated solution with his argument, but gives answers as to why it support his point that God does not exist. One of his arguments is that “Good cannot exist without evil”; Mackie explains that this limits the power of God and if you say that you need evil for you to see the good is just a nonsensical thing to say. Mackie provides an example and says that if you see a murder then would you stop it, but if you do, then you are obscuring good from happening in the world. He says this only proves that God does not have ultimate power he restricts himself because he allowed good and bad to not exist without each other and he cannot stop it. Mackie also argues that “Evil is necessary as a means to good." He states that this also brings restriction to Gods omnipotence, because if evil is necessary, then why did God create it, he could have made the world in a different way where evil does not have to depend on good to exist, why did he not just create the good. Another

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the logical problem of evil, it is made aware that three things must be true in the contemporary version layout for evil to exist. They are that God is all good, He is all…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    No idea of a benevolent God is comfortable in a world with the widow” (para. 15). He introduces a mysterious tone to this paragraph, introducing theology into his essay, and yet he still manages to be informative throughout the previous parts of the essay. Through his modes, literary devices, and diction, Grice is able to express his idea that the world possesses a malicious, unexplainable evil, and he uses the example of the black widow for this. His idea of evil can be examined deeper as well, not only searching for the reasons behind evil, but searching for the reasons behind good in the world. Grice tries to explain the reason behind evil, so why not the reason behind good as well?…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If God, an all-good being, did not exist, then it would make sense for evil to exist. However, Hayes ended her rhetorical question with “I hope not”, showing that her faith had not totally disappeared (McDonagh). Nevertheless, if God did exist, he is still omnibenevolent, so why does evil, such as Hayes’ daughter’s killer, exist within His creation? According to Thomas Aquinas, “... we trace what regards the activity of those with the power of free choice to God as the cause, while only free choice, not God, causes what regards the deordination or deformity of those with the power of free choice. And that is why we say that acts of sin come from God, but sin does not” (Aquinas 148).…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He establishes that God’s limitless power should allow him to create beings who freely choose to do the good thing on every occasion, rather than beings who “sometimes prefer what is good and sometimes what is evil” (p. 124). Mackie proceeds to raises an important question: “can an omnipotent being make things which he cannot subsequently control?” (p. 125). In the second premise, Mackie addresses God’s omnibenevolence. According to Mackie, if God was all loving or infinitely good, he would have wanted his creations to have the same nature and ultimately have done so, rather than creating humans whose freedom of choice sometimes leads to the creation of evil.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evil is necessary because, as stated, without it, how would we ever know what good is? For example, wisdom teeth can cause pain and suffering and getting them pulled is painful and there is suffering for a little while afterward. However, in the end, it is good to get them pulled because now there is no longer any pain or suffering. The evil that is in the world is unavoidable for a reason – to show us what good really is. Evil is just a means to an end, where the “end” is “good”.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For this reason Mackie believes that they are of no help to the theist when trying to solve the problem of evil. One fallacious solution the theist offers is this: Good cannot exist without evil. This brings us back to the adequate solutions though, because by saying good cannot exist without evil than you are setting a limit to God’s power. Therefore, making God not omnipotent. Also, Mackie uses the example of comparing good and evil to red and non-red.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is one prevailing question each of us ask ourselves consistently, “Does God exist?” Even though people’s responses are different, nearly all responses are contingent upon one’s beliefs, experiences, and influences. Despite the lack of knowledge, God is known to be an all-loving, all-powerful, and creator of all things in most communities, but those qualities are often questioned by scientists and philosophers. The existence of God was significantly debated among philosophers during the 18th and 19th centuries, however, each esteemed philosopher had a distinct argument explaining their rationale, while criticizing another’s. In this paper, I will analyze William Paley’s, teleological argument, which is the argument for the existence of…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am going to argue that Blackburn is wrong to claim that the existence of evil strongly suggest that there does not exist a god who is all-good, all-knowing and all-powerful. Exposition - Words (189) Blackburn's argument is that the three characteristics normally attributed to God in any given religion is that he is all powerful, all knowing, and all caring, but that these three qualities cannot resolve itself with the presence of evil in the world. Since evil does exist and is indisputably a part of the world that exists, the characteristics of God must mold itself around its existence. If God is all powerful, then evil only exists at his command.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pascal delineates between three types of existence: the finite, the infinite, and God. The finite makes up the observable universe; its existence and nature are both provable through reason. The infinite (i.e. numbers) may be understood to exist although its nature remains unprovable by reason (i.e. odd or even?). Pascal describes God as a being with “neither extension nor limits” This renders any extrapolation of reason used to prove the existence or nature of God based on the other two realms indeterminate. Pascal further argues that wagering a finite existence (a human life) for the possibility of infinite reward makes the decision to believe in God even without the certainty of his existence an infinitely profitable wager.…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He thought that not a lot of people would be willing to compromise and accept one of those beliefs however, because if someone did they would be left with the conclusion that their high and all mighty God was in fact un-worthy of worshipping. After Mackie comes up with his own take on the problem of evil, he agrees with a lot of the points the problem of evil considers, and comes to the conclusion that the problem of evil is both inconsistent and illogical. Mackie set out to disprove the common belief that God was in fact an “omnipotent and wholly god” by coming up with an argument. He breaks the problem down to three propositions.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Arguments From Evil: Elliot Sober I. Introduction The reality of evil existing in our world has been questioned throughout time based on the argument that an all powerful, all knowing, and all good (all-PKG) God cannot coexist with evil. The problem of evil only appears when there is a PKG God because if God is all powerful, all knowing, and all good then how could there still be evil. Therefore, if one of those properties we removed then there would no longer be a problem because then God couldn 't prevent evil from happening.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kids are killed and preyed upon all because of preferred clothing and indulgences, despite their premature intentions and their character. Police brutality is at an all-time high, and nothing is being changed. Laws are not being reformed. Racial profiling is beyond detrimental for domestic life here in America. When will the realization come to the surface that just because one Latino steals, one African American acts obnoxious, or one white American acts snobbish, that person does not define the next?…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evil exists because we chose it to. We, as free agents can choose between right and wrong. Through this we can justify our actions. What kind of world would we lead if everything was already decided for us and all we would have to do is perform it? God, although knows how we will choose, plays absolutely no role in our process of choosing.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To clarify his central theme of rejecting objectivity in moral reasoning, Mackie explains “The Argument of Relativity” which discusses the variation in moral perspectives from other societies and cultures who experience different methods of living. Since every civilization differs in living standards and their ways of life, it can be agreed that not everyone will have identical sets of moral values. As a result, this dismantles the idea of having objective moral reasoning. This is because it’s not possible for one population cannot be more right or moral than the other since they all have differentiating values. In turn, since this moral disagreement exists amongst individualistic settlements, Mackie says that it’s implausible to have a universalistic,…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before I explain that, I am going to tell you what is cosmological argument. The cosmological Argument (Greek "cosmos"= orderly whole): a posterior, deductive. "god" is the "first (uncaused) cause "of the cosmos. it is deductive, so it is a candidate for soundness. Then the cosmological argument is the argument that the existence of the world or universe is strong evidence for the existence of a God who created it.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics