Why Russian People Rebelled Against Tsar Nicholas II

Better Essays
Umme Rahman December 11, 2014
Global History Essay Section 9E Citizens who appreciate and agree upon their ruler have no reason to act upon or rebel against the ruler, which explains why Russian civilians rebelled against Tsar Nicholas Iain 1915, Tsar Nicholas II too complete control of Russia. He was not the ruler the people hoped he would be. By 1917, most Russian civilians lost hope in him, which led to the February Revolution which happened after World War I. The Russian military continued to face humiliations. People could not take any more of Tsars continuous disappointments, which was affecting the Russian nation. Eventually, the Tsar was abdicated on March 2, 1917, after all the chaos he caused and left behind. Some may
…show more content…
This is a valid argument because indeed the World War I disasters had an effect on how people felt about their society and how they believed it should run. They believe that if the disasters if World War I was avoided, then Russians would not have revolted against their government. But to disagree, the current situation in Russia at the time was already intolerable and was eventually going to get worse with the help of the Tsar. Tsar Nicholas II had no idea on how to run a military, not to mention a country. As is states “Unfortunately, the Tsar knew little about the command and organization of large military forces, and the series of defeats and humiliations continued” (The Cause if the Russian Revolution). Politically, the Tsar was unaware of the command tactics. Anything could have gone wrong with the full authority in his hand. As aHe was inexperienced and due to the lack of experience in the field, he continued to lead the military force to disappointment and humiliations. Battle after battle was lost due to the Tsar. If the leader is not strong in political ideals, then eventually there will be certain unwanted situation, which for the Tsar was the Russian

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    He was unqualified to govern Russia because he did not allow Russia to be more modernized and they lack industrialization. The citizens suffered and were treated as slave; they decides to revolt against Tsar. Additionally, Tsar’s wanted extreme power. He refused to share that power with anyone also not doing his job correctly. Also, his poor leadership in war led to the Russian revolution.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Since the early 1600’s Russia had been ruled by the Romanov family. The final Tsars were increasingly ineffective and when Tsar Nicholas II came into power he did not fix the mistakes of the past Tsars and due to his bad leadership he is solely to blame for bringing his country into ruin which in turn led to his downfall, however, the people of Russia were eager for change because of the mistakes of the past Tsars and Nicholas II could not govern the entire country and keep them from wanting a revolution. During the course of Nicholas II reign he made various mistakes that contributed to his downfall. Nicholas II’s father, Alexander II, brought a police of Russification which stated that the non-native people of Russia must give up their…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For revolutionaries, they were not concerned as to who was sitting on their throne, but they saw the Russian system as one that was by definition headed by a tyrant who was an oppressor of the people. Due to Nicholas II’s personal qualities, he was thought to be unfit to be the ideal monarch. Podbolotov does call attention to the fact that the objective circumstances of the era that ultimately prevented the Tsar from reigning “autocratically” were not taken into account by conservatives. Yet, Monarchists’ attempts to influence Nicholas collided with his lack of indifference and initiative, which were attributes that were deemed unsuitable for an autocrat. Podbolotov also explains that the criticism of the Tsar strengthened from the defeats in the Russo-Japanese War and the Tsar’s “childish desire” to conquer Manchuria.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nicholas was charming and intelligent a man who had the welfare of russia at heart. But Nicholas lacked the necessary characteristics for autocratic rule. He was anxious, distrustful of ministers such as Witte and stolypin, who urged reform. his abilities were undermines by his diffidence and irresolution. In the opinion of George Buchanan, British ambassador to St Petersburg from 1910, “The emperor Nicholas was one of the most pathetic figures in history, he was so unfitted for the role and never really governed Russia.” The industrial revolution throughout russia had just been started at the time of the First World War, this is partly to blame for the fall of the Romanov Dynasty.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He was infuriatingly indecisive, and didn't know how to run the Russian government at all. Unable to manage the continuing strikes that had risen up all over Russia, he pretended that everything was all right and that the peasants were just making a fuss because they were ‘bored'. When the Duma (the Russian people's elected parliament, which had little power) tried to warn him of the seriousness of the situation, he ignored and dissolved them instead. This brewed even more hatred toward the Tsar amongst his people. The Tsar was also influenced very easily by people around him, especially his wife, Tsarina Alexandra.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Provisional Government became very unpopular after many of their reforms were not to the liking of the Russian working class. The Provisional Government was blamed with food shortages and rising prices due to continuing to fight in World War One despite the Russian people opposing this action. The Provisional Government wanted to continue fighting so the allies would continue to support them. Another reason why the Provisional Government was disliked was due to failing to hand out land to peasants. The Russian government told farmers to claim their land after the election; however the Provisional Government had not yet allowed the Russian people to vote for their own government.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II’s poor leadership made the people lose faith in him, and therefore lose faith in the Tsarist regime, resulting in anarchy and revolution. Nicholas was unprepared for the difficult situation he was put in as Tsar, and he was totally unequipped to deal with it. Founder of Spartacus Educational and former history teacher John Simkin states, “Nicholas inherited from his ancestors not only a great empire, nut also a revolution. And they did not bequeath him one quality which would have made him capable of governing an empire. Or even a country" [Simkin, 1997] The system needed reform, but he was unwilling to limit his power at all, for the sole reason that he thought it was his duty to pass on his full and complete autocratic powers…

    • 1329 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II Downfall

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The line “…by authorities whom We shall appoint” clearly shows how the Tsar is reluctant to give his people their rights as he wanted to keep his power and the system of Autocracy in Russia. This can be amplified in a letter to his ‘dearest mama’ on the 2nd of November, 1905, “…this terrible decision, which I nevertheless took quite consciously” further reinforcing the fact that Nicholas II was not sincere in improving his own nation from the release of the October Manifesto . The contradicting statements in the October Manifesto further stimulated the growing discontent of the people as the rights that they are given are still limited by Tsar Nicholas. As Trotsky states in 1905, “Everything is given and nothing is given”. Therefore, the release of the October Manifesto was a key event…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    People were demanding social and political reforms but Nicholas was unable to comply because the Aristocracy and the Military elites would not allow these changes. Finally, when the Duma abandoned the Tsar and forced him to abdicate, the entire Tsarist regime was replaced with a strict, socialist system. The people were willing to sacrifice individual liberties in order to achieve social and economic equality. Bibliography Last modified 2002. Accessed November 26, 2014. http://www.johndclare.net.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This was a war that could have been avoided. Russia chose to reject the proposal of defined spheres of influence propositioned by Japan, which spurred Russia into an isolated war with Japan from February 8th 1904 – September 5th 1905. Throughout the conflict, Russia was perceived as arrogant and ignorant of the vast military strength and technological advancements of the supposed ‘infidels’ as referred to by Tsar Nicholas II. Had the war been won, the regime may have been able to gain political capital from this nationalistic upsurge. However, what patriotism flooded through the Russian forces was soon overturned by the realization that they were poorly equipped with outdated weaponry and there were terrible logistical problems in running a war from 6,000 miles away from the fight.…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays