Analysis Of Better Than Hum Take Our Jobs By Kevin Kelly

Better Essays
Kelly’s Future
Robots have been changing jobs and life as we know it. Slowly robots have been given the jobs that we would have been doing decades ago. However, many people wants to know whether that’s a good or bad thing. In the article “Better than Human: Why Robots Will — and Must — Take Our Jobs” by Kevin Kelly he argues that we should welcome our robots because instead of causing problems they are initially helping. The main idea Kelly tried to get across in his article is that robots are now taking over human jobs but they are also creating and replacing humans with better jobs. He also talks about how robots will be able to do jobs no one ever imagined and help expand us in our new job discoveries. Robots are able to learn at a faster
…show more content…
It is true that robots are useful tools that help to save time and money, and many companies show bright results in productivity. Moreover, people can use robots to do their own business, and it is a simple way to earn money. In this case, Kelly concludes, "It’s cheap enough that small-time manufacturers can afford one to package up their wares or custom paint their product or run their 3-D printing machine" (304). This idea leads to the fact that people begin to use digital tools to create new jobs because 3-D printing machines require designers in this field. On the other side, the weak point in this argument is the aspect of the framework of employment. According to Shewan, he states that "for every job created by robotic automation, several more will be eliminated entirely" (Shewan par. 12). This evidence suggests that only ten robots can take jobs of thousands of people. Unfortunately, this data leads to negative consequences to lives of people because they will lose their jobs and will not get new positions in the nearest time. However, both positions of sides lead to the logical conclusion that people will get more free time in the future because of …show more content…
In particular, Kelly is sure that robots can create new jobs because automatic machines can replace the labor force of people. In this case, humans do not need work on farms or other places because robots will do all tasks for them. As a result, millions of people can get more free time for important things, and they will get new jobs. Unfortunately, Kelly does not cover negative sides of automation. The fact is that people cannot satisfy requirements of new jobs, and they lose their jobs. It means that since people cannot earn money, then they cannot pay for education. Thus, Kelly's arguments that automation can bring a comfortable life for people is not valid in the nearest future because of rapid changes in the labor market and lack of

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Better Than Human Essay

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As technology continues to advance with every passing minute, it seems as if the idea of robots taking over human jobs, whether it be physical or intellectual, no longer seems too far off from reality. While it currently seems likely that machines are on a path to take over human jobs, many still feel uncomfortable with this becoming their reality. Kevin Kelly in his persuasive essay, “Better than Human: Why Robots Will-and Must-Take Our Jobs, assumes that his audience is anti-machine job takeover, and attempts to persuade his audience through the use of logos. Kelly heavily relies on logos throughout his essay, it becomes his crutch as there is insufficient amount of strong evidence that prove his claim. Kelly states that a “recurring pattern…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Better Than Human Analysis

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    These machines increase production in factories and make the creation of products much easier. The author uses repetition in this article to make the fact clear that robots are able to do our jobs better, faster, and more efficiently. He says, “It may be hard to believe, but before the end of this century, 70 percent of today’s occupations will likewise be replaced by automation” (Kelly). Based on the percentage, the reader is able to get a better visualization on how much more robots could do, and how many jobs will be taken over by robots. He further explains this point by saying robots will not only take over physically-demanding labor, but also work that requires knowledge.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The machines that were invented during the 19th century actually expanded the need for more jobs and even produced other types of jobs afterwards. This allowed more people to work because the machines were so simple to use, anyone was able to get hired. Robots on the other hand, is going to cause a reverse effect. They are going to wipe out jobs entirely. Lets say for example, Mcdonald’s decided to replace their workers with robots, which will save them tons of cash in the long run due to not having to pay robots a salary.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However, this argument is unwarranted. Yes, robots replace the jobs of humans if the jobs are considered dull, dangerous, or dirty. However, this simply opens humans to contribute to society in a different way. It allows for humans to use their creativity and vision in a career rather than the opposite. While robots taking menial jobs appears to be a problem in modern society, this will be a long-term benefit of robots; society just must wait for the effects to kick in.…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Human Workers Technology

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Companies around the globe are replacing traditional human workers with robots and machines. Manufacturing companies see robotics as the future of assembly, possessing the power and potential to assemble products with more efficiency, allowing the company to manufacture more products than ever believed possible. Based on my research however, I…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Employees have to work as a team to get success. Growth in robotics would increase productivity, raise the economy and would benefit human society rather than taking human jobs and creating unemployment. Cecilian Kang, who is a journalist for The Washington Post, says in her article, “New robots in the workplace: Job creators…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    According to http://www.macworld.com/article/3045299/robots/meet-sophia-the-female-humanoid-robot-and-newest-sxsw-celebrity.html, they have already made one named Sophia. Sophia is human like robot who has the same emotions as human. She is trained to work as hard without getting tired. A lot of people may not approve of this because in doing this there could be a lot of job losses. This could help jobs because the robots can work faster and do more work for free.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    2016 In this article Arnold Brown looks at the possible change in the relationship between humans and robots in the future. He believes that as robotics becomes more advanced there will be fewer jobs that humans are responsible for doing. Arnold Brown is the chairman of the board of World Future Society which is responsible for investigating possible technological advancements in the future, making him an extremely credited source on the topic of robotics effects on jobs. In Brown’s article, he brings up a terrifying question that could soon become a reality. If we were able to produce perfect robotic beings capable of nearly all possible jobs would they be seen as slaves?…

    • 1591 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Corporations can save money using robots because they do not need to pay them. Another way for corporations to better profit is to send jobs overseas. The economy changes frequently makes an insecure occupation…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “Raising the minimum wage to $15 per hour is not the way to get wages up in this country. In fact, it would cause perhaps as many as a million people to lose their jobs” (Trugman) Most people will only see their paychecks go up and not the people in their workplace disappear. They would be greedy if they would rather have more cash for themselves, then a million people getting no paycheck at all. “Raising the salary of some and making or keeping half a million unemployed is not a win for the economy, and it’s not a win for the American worker.” (Trugman) No one would be winning by getting paid more. Everything would go up in prices and the amount of people working would go down making everything so uneven and not what the people want.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays