Why Police Should Wear Body Mounted Cameras Essay

1174 Words 5 Pages
Why Police Should Wear Body Mounted Cameras
Thomas Jefferson once said, “Whenever you do a thing, act as if the world were watching” (Mims). Recently, there has been a heated debate on the controversial topic of whether or not law enforcement agencies should be required to wear body mounted cameras. The problem that continuously emanates is human error. For example, millions of protests have been elicited by the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri (Stanley). This complication could be mitigated by the use of body mounted cameras. Unfortunately, in 2013, only one out of four police departments reported that they used body mounted cameras. Body mounted cameras would possibly correct the dilemmas between law enforcement
…show more content…
If a camera was mounted to the body of a police officer, the entire situation could be recorded and observed in a whole as opposed to only a fragment of the situation being recalled. According to ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union), cameras can see a total of fourty to ninety degrees more than the human eyes (Geis).

Reducing Complaints In order to avoid complaints from the public about how police officers are abusing their power, body mounted cameras could be implemented instead. The first thing that needs to occur would be, training for the officers (Miller & Toliver). If the law enforcement required training in order to operate the cameras, less complaints would be filed because the cameras would show proof of the actual situation. A complication about wearing these mounted cameras would be, privacy complaints. In order to circumnavigate around the dilemma of recording too much, officers should be required to record only serious matters that arise in the criminal justice field and only withhold the documentation until it is no longer essential to the court of justice to (Stanley).
…show more content…
Essentially, there is not much (if any), documented evidence of the encounters between the law enforcement agencies and the public (Stanley). Therefor, without testimony from either side, how can there be trust between the two? The answer could be implementing body mounted cameras into the law enforcement field. If these cameras were a part of the scarring homicide of Michael Brown, the outcome would have been substantially different (Stanley). The reason as to why the outcome would have been distantly off from what it was, would be given to the fact that body mounted cameras determine whether or not, it was the police or the citizens that cause the confrontation (University). Due to the use of mounted body cameras, documentation of each report, confrontation, or domestic encounter would increase, that proves true for all confrontations; not just Michael Brown. In contrast, the aiding these cameras can potentially provide would confirm with each and every conspirator or witness when they are interviewed, that they willingly give consent to being on camera. In order to avoid obvious privacy concerns. Furthermore, there must also be a policy contrived giving supervisors authorization to review the video recorded from the camera (Miller & Toliver). Studies show, that cameras influence the tone between civilians and

Related Documents