Why Not Utopia Mark Bittman Analysis

Improved Essays
Albert Einstein once said: “I fear the day that technology will surpass our human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots.”. In Mark Bittman’s article Why Not Utopia? he explores the correlation between a rise in robotic automation and a flawed distribution of income. Robotic automation is an ineffective replacement due to the fact that they will leave the poor people even poorer as a result of job loss, and the rich will become richer because they can afford to have robots work for them. A flawed model for income distribution has led to a significant amount of capital being kept with the wealthiest citizens, who are not spending a significant amount relative to what they make. Robots used for labour in place of skilled workers …show more content…
Autonomous robots are not a sufficient replacement for human labourers due to the fact that they are not trained to react to situations that have not been programmed into them. This is seen in Brian Stableford’s The Highway Code, in which Tom Haste fails to react properly to a situation he had not experienced before: “he had a pretty good idea what must be happening—but hadn’t the faintest idea what to do about it, or whether there was anything at all that he could do.” (Stableford, 44). When robots are used to complete tasks that humans were trained for, this causes a high unemployment rate. The doctors, engineers and other skilled workers will all be replaced by these robots, leading them to become unemployed. Robots required to complete these tasks will be very expensive, and only the most affluent citizens will be able to afford them, leading to an even greater gap between the rich and poor, essentially removing the middle class. In the long-run, this will ultimately lead to the downfall of humanity because very few people will be able to afford the goods that are produced, causing everyone to be worse off. As a result of capitalism, income distribution is inadequate which is concerning for those skilled workers who are barely making enough to get by. The government must tax the wealthy, and provide a liveable income for those poorer people who are struggling to make ends meet. Only when there is a suitable balance in income distribution, will there be a world where all people are able to afford their basic needs. For an economically just society to come to fruition, human labourers must continue to be employed and not be replaced by autonomous

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    (Andersen 208) Those rich countries can’t use their own population for their production because the labor is heavily expensive in their country and the economy will drop down. However, they use poor country who needs money because labor is cheaper. Social inequality pushed the core countries to send jobs overseas and thus those exploited countries tend to migrate in thinking that all the work is inside, which leads the economy to drop because everyone needs to be…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By selling the sneakers at a much higher price then what it cost to manufacture them, a substantial profit was produced for the business, but no additional benefits were earned by the workers. As the activists and Marx point out, the money-grubbing corporate world expands its capital at the expense of the workers, while the poor workers are guaranteed a lifetime of poverty and unhappiness. In addition to the exploitive nature of the workings of capitalism shown in the first scene, the activists were very conscious and extremely critical of the inequality that existed between their living conditions and that of Hardenberg, the rich businessman whom Jules was deeply indebted. Hardenberg acknowledged that his wealth provided him and his family a high standard of living which included many privileges, such as hiring an expensive attorney that saddled young Jules with a boatload of debt that greatly impacted her chances of…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Trade does, from time to time, create losers and, unfortunately, there is no way of protecting them. When a company relocates its plants to another country, as mentioned above, it costs many people their livelihoods. Protecting these jobs, however important and morally correct it may be, will stunt economic growth in the long run. If a factory is not relocated for the sake of saving jobs, it no longer has the ability to produce more at a cheaper rate. The economy is no longer growing, it is stuck in the same place it was when the company started.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This will lead to unused industrial capacity (the mountain of unsold goods has resulted in a large percentage of machinery of all kinds lying idle, while many pressing needs—but needs that the people who have them can't pay for—go unmet). From unused industrial capacity the unemployment rate will gown. In market economy, the inequality in economic and social is especially high. It's because the rich get richer and everyone else gets poorer. It will cause people with a lot of money begin to think of themselves as a better kind of human being and to view the poor with contempt, while the poor feel a mixture of hatred, envy and queasy respect for the rich.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since when are the rich only aloud to prosper while the rest of us drown in debt and misery? There is an understanding when society says that those who prosper have earned it and should be able to do so because of the free society we live in. However, The poor in our society are not benefiting from the increased wealth in the country. The income gap between low-income families and high-income families is widened. “The rich have been spending more simply because they have so much extra money…These cascades have made it substantially more expensive for middle-class families to achieve basic financial goals” (Frank 582).…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This takes the jobs from developed countries because those countries have a higher wage that the workers have to be paid so companies are leaving to poor countries for lower wages (Wild & Wild, 2014). It is not a good thing when companies out sourcing for lower wages which is happening in the United States which means a lot of unemployment since the jobs are going overseas. China had took over 2.4 million jobs from countries because of the low wages (Collins, 2015). All of these jobs were taken from well developed countries which has made people lose their jobs which is a negative affect because of globalization. The multinational corporations are also taking advantage of poor countries by making the working conditions they work in to be unsafe (Collins, 2015).…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The concept that the amount of money obtained is most important, has its negative consequences on people and the environment. Firstly, an employee working for low wages, results in companies profiting immensely. However, not having the right of democracy or citizen participation in the workplace makes employees resent their jobs even more. The capitalist principals lead to inequality, which result in the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer. Also, the capitalist system shows no ecological concern, and worries solely on economic growth.…

    • 1701 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The wealthy businessmen argued that they had worked hard for their wealth and deserved to be rich, they refused to pay their fair share of taxes to help out the rest of the American people and the American economy. Rich businessmen did not like the establishment of a minimum wage because it took money from their great wealth, despite the fact that the establishment of a minimum wage helped to balance out the uneven distribution of wealth that the US economy was having. According to Sarah Carroll, “There was a major unequal distribution of income that led to the richest 1% of Americans owning approximately 40% of the country’s wealth”(3). The establishment of the minimum wage ensured that the wealth was trickling down instead of just accumulating all at the top with the upper class, which in turn helped the uneven distribution of…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Research shows people are as likely to move downward as they are upward in the class system. Capitalism, is a system which in particular, benefits the rich an government creates arrangement of direct subsidies, tax breaks, and other support for big businesses. Inequality is inevitable within a system that has individual competition at its core, and therefore, people divide into the group of ‘winners’ and ‘losers.’ The increase of immigrants in the U.S. and the loss of jobs cause the unfair competition for immigrants in the U.S.The immigrants and people of color have being affected by class and racial dynamic by not getting the equal job opportunities. Beside the language and culture problems, immigrants have no place…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Big Corporations undermine democracy by avoiding taxes because they can change the market to favor them. They have tons of money so they have power and influence over government, because with their money the government would not be able to function properly so the government has no choice but to pass policies in their favor. It’s been proven that the rich have more say in government while “average citizens” like you and I “have next to no influence.” (Covert) Big Corporations are costing us money by not paying the taxes they are supposed to pay. We could have lower tax brackets and not have lower taxes but because they don’t do their fair share of paying we have to pay higher taxes than we need to. This is insane because it’s costing the united states “around $100 billion per year”…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays