Immanuel Kant Essay: Is Torture Ever Justified?

Improved Essays
There are a lot debatable conflicts about the subject of torture and if it is ever justified. Most individuals believe that torture violates the human dignity of the victim. Comparatively, other individuals express that some situations exist in which torture is justifiable, depending on the circumstances. Similarly, my original opinion on torture also expressed the belief that torture may be justified in certain situations. However, throughout the semester the ideals of Immanuel Kant, and the understanding of the human right involving no torture, inhumane, or degrading treatment, have instigated a change in my beliefs. Instead, I believe that individual views can corrupt the initial motive for torture. Therefore, I believe that the circumstantial justification of torture is one of the many reasons why it is an unjust form of interrogation.
Although it may be true that torture is not ever justifiable because of human rights, we can count a lot of reasons where torture is acceptable. First of all, I believed torture was acceptable as a form of interrogation because the physical suffering of one person may be justified if many lives can be saved. I was under the belief of the Utilitarian ticking time bomb scenario. For example, taking the situation from Unthinkable, a terrorist set up bombs in major American cities.
…show more content…
I believe that the motive to not torture is doing what is morally worthy and the most ethical thing to do. I find the practices of torture abhorrent and barbaric. In a sense, torture treats individuals as if they are less than human and undeserving of respect and dignity. Other methods must exist to deal with incidences such as terrorism.Therefore, I believe there is no moral reason to punish an individual with torture when another way may be more effective to make them to correct their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Jessica Wolfendale discusses what permitting torture would involve realistically in her work Training Torturers: A Critique of the “Ticking Bomb” Argument. The hypothetical ticking bomb argument fails to distinguish a justification of the general practice and individual instances of torture. She refers to the discussion as “a new war in which moral constraints do not apply”, for to allow torture is to allow the training of torturers. Historically they have been chosen for obedience, trustworthiness, political beliefs, and endurance of pain. Torturers would have to be trained in interrogational torture.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The government is known to do controversial actions when it comes to interrogation. The most controversial tactic is torture treatment. Torture treatment has always been around, but there have always been issues with it. The main issue is, is it constitutional? The eighth amendment states that no one is subject to cruel and unusual punishment.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When hearing about torture, whether on the news or in an article, we as Americans do not consider the lasting effects it has on people. Physical and psychological torture is mainly employed as war tactics, to get information out of people. Torture is not a concept that is talked about on a day to day basis, because of the many freedoms we experience as Americans. In the article The Case for Torture, Michael Levin portrays torture as something that should be permissible.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If we use torture tactics we could prevent more major terrorist attacks. Torture is the easiest way to get information out of terrorist. The CIA would only use torture methods on Al Qaeda leaders in order to get information that may prevent future attacks. Personally I believe that these torture methods are justified because of what they do to POW’s overseas. 59% of the American society support the CIA’s methods according to new polls conducted by telephone calls.(Adam Goldman reports on terrorism and national security for The Washington Post.)…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the same time the opponents of these methods were convinced that one individual could not be an organizer of so many terrorist plots and revealed their skepticism in relation to his claims. They stated that taking into consideration the types of tortures, which could be applied to an individual, there is never a guarantee that his confessions are true to life and were not made purely with the aim to stop tortures and remain alive. This argument makes everybody doubt as for effectiveness of tortures. “For instance, a torture victim deprived of his clothes will feel so “ashamed and humiliated and cold,” said retired FBI counterterrorism agent Dan Coleman, “he 'll tell you anything you want to hear to get his clothing back. There 's no value in it.”…

    • 1037 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Bowden Torture

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is a thin line between torture, coercion, and persuasion. For some countries, torture is an adequate form of punishment used to not only instill fear, but to also show the consequences of prohibited actions to others. However, for the United States and other countries who have signed the Geneva Convention, torture is strictly prohibited, but is still practiced in different forms. The article “The Dark Art of Interrogation,” written by Mark Bowden, explores various interrogation techniques used throughout the War on Terror by the United States Military, the Israeli government, and the New York City Police force. Each of the agencies consistently agreed that using “hard torture” was “the classic shortcut for a lazy or incompetent investigator”(…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With the infliction of pain on individuals endangering the U.S., it creates a deterrent or a scare tactic towards other nations ("Torture Is a Just Means of Preventing Terrorism."). The idea of torture strikes fear into the hearts of terrorist subjects because it can be brutal when they fail to comply. This fear deterrent now creates a robust and powerful figure for the United States, in that no organization or terrorist has any desire to attack a country that will get all information needed, and one can either suffer or give away vital information of their associates ("Torture Is a Just Means of Preventing Terrorism)". This idea may seem completely immoral to some, however needs to be accepted. The idea of war is immensely immoral, however it is inevitable at different times throughout history.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    America should have torture as a form of punishment. Less crimes would be committed. As for this, with this knowledge being known, crimes such as first degree murder, rape, ect. & instead of shedding the mercy of death to a person who committed such terrible acts, we should rain the misery of life & with this knowledge at hand along with knowledge that this isn’t some threats of barks would bring fear to the sins that make us fear them.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I defend the nature of the balance of civil liberties, rights and torture by drawing upon Jeremy Waldron, Henry Shue and Jeff McMahan’s view on the morality of torture. Torture is the act of deliberately inflicting severe physical or psychological pain to an individual who is restrained and defenseless. Reasons for torture can include punishment, revenge, political re-education, deterrence, interrogation or coercion of the victim or a third party, or simply the sadistic gratification of those carrying out or observing the torture. In this paper I will argue that torture is not morally justified; torture ought not to be legalized or otherwise institutionalized even in the ticking time bomb scenario because the rights of the innocent…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture Vs Torture

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Unfortunately, however, different forms of inhuman and degrading treatment and punishment as well as torture are practised in all parts of the world, including highly industrialised and developed countries. Despite the fact that society is evolving, the effect of torture remains the same: such violations of human rights result in serious harm to the human being, to his physical and mental immunity, and requires a lot of effort to make it stop. Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) says: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment” . For many years international legal institutions have been developing, improving and consolidating different ways of resolving the problem. At…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Wrong To Torture

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Desperate Times Would you ever hurt someone? What if hurting that someone meant that you would be seen as a hero amongst many? What if hurting someone meant that you were able to save innocent lives? What if hurting someone meant that you lost a piece of yourself and what it means to be human? `The topic at hand is if it is ever justifiable to torture someone under any circumstance.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Torture Is Wrong

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Torture is generally ineffective, effects those subjected to it for the remainder of their lives, and is unacceptable no matter the reason. Consider the United Nations, what it is and what it stands for. The United Nations wrote and signed something known as the Geneva Conventions. The Geneva Conventions explicitly state in article 3 that, “humane treatment is required for all people in enemy hands. The use of murder, mutilation, torture, and the use of humiliating or degrading treatment is prohibited.”…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Levin’s hypothetical leads to the illogical “A Case For Torture” is an essay written by Michael Levin in which he tries to make a compelling case for the use of torture as a punishment during certain situations in the United States. One of the ways Levin tries to logically prove his argument is by citing different real life situations; some examples are situations that actually occurred, but most are hypothetical situations. The use of hypothetical situations is meant to help direct the reader to understand the applications of Levin’s policy on torture. With that, Levin is not convincing in his argument as he relies too heavily on the hypothetical. Michael Levin in “A Case For Torture” is not logically convincing in his discussion as to why…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Levin also strategically uses logos to appeal to the reader’s sense of logic. Throughout the article the author discusses reasons of when torture is justified. Knowing that many Americans consider torture unconstitutional, Michael tries to reason with the audience saying, “Millions of lives outweigh constitutionality.” Even though torture is barbic, the audiences come to sense that mass murder is even more barbic. The piece makes the audience re-think their opinion torture if it means lives will be saved.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It may be possible my intuition could be drastically misaligned with military ethics in some manner. In the past, it has been mentioned I allow the ends to justify the means. The same was said of those who believe torture is a viable option to extract information from prisoners in order to prevent future attacks5. Given this realization, I may have some difficult dilemmas awaiting me in the…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays