Why Is The Reign Of Terror Justified

Improved Essays
The Justification of the Reign Of Terror Threatening to end the French Revolution. The French Revolution has been building up for years under the rule of King Louis 16. The things that lead up to the people of France revolting against the king was the serious debt, expensive wars, and the starving of the people of France. After the people of France revolted against the King they formed the new government as a republic. Down the road a man named Maximilian Robespierre introduced the guillotine and thus started The Reign Of Terror. The Reign Of Terror is a period of remorseless repression and bloodshed and some wonder if the The Reign of Terror was justified or unnecessary. The Reign of Terror was justified because of the actions of the people …show more content…
The French government just wanted to protect the better good of the people of France by taking care of the counterrevolutionaries. The counterrevolutionaries were mostly fighting to restore the monarchy. Didn’t the monarchy put the country in serious debt and do nothing for the starving people. That’s why the allied army wanted to go to war with France, to restore the monarchy. The terror is the only reason why France is the country it is today. Without the terror the France would not have stood a chance against the allied countries and the counterrevolutionaries. If Maximilian had never introduced the idea of terror who knows what would have happened to France maybe it would be that same as it is today or restored as a monarchy. So it is basically either going to a republic or restoring the monarchy by saying it was unjustified for the acts of terror. If you think it was unjustified then the terror should have never happened then. Then the people of France would still be starving to death and still suffering the debt the king left it in. Since the terror was established people got their own rights and the people didn’t have to suffer anymore. You live in a contrary were you have rights and opportunity. Using terror is just a strategy plan used by the French to form the new republic and keep the chance of rights alive. Now let’s take the rights away and put you in the shoes of the people who were trying to give everyone rights. Are you going to ask the enemies who are trying to kill you for your rights or fight for them just like America? So yes I do think it the reign of terror was justified because I believe that people should do whatever it takes to get your divine human rights. The French fought for liberty under the idea of terror and at around the same time didn’t America just fight for our

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    During the French Revolution, revolutionaries wanted to create a government that would value people’s rights. Unfortunately, violence started to play a role in order to achieve the goals of the revolution. The period in which the violence started became known as the Reign of Terror. Individual rights were being ignored and thousands of people were being executed because they were suspected of aiding or being an enemy. The Reign of Terror was not justified because the actions toward external threat did not require it, the actions toward internal threat did not deserve it, and the methods that were used were to extreme.…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    September 1792 marks a turning point in history. A time of divided people, a time of beheading, and a time of terror. The Reign of Terror began with to imprisonment of Louis XVI in September of 1792. A new type of government was put in place, republic, causing the division of people. Some were counterrevolutionaires, against the new government, some were pro-revolution, for the new government. The two sides did not get along so the government turned to Terror. With the new invention of the Guillotine, and the power of Robespierre, the man behind the Reign of Terror, this time became brutal and violent. Although the counterrevolutionaries were becoming slightly out of control, the Reign of Terror was not justified because it violated the inalienable rights of citizens, the methods of execution were too extreme, and France was already stronger than all of its internal and external threats.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before the revolution, France had spent the majority of their money helping the Americans gain freedom from the British. With their bank account spent, the leaders of the country would cut back on their share of the money to help the country get back on its feet. King Louis did not do this. Instead he spent “anywhere from 6-25% of the entire French government income” on the upkeep of his massive palace. (The Palace of Versailles). Instead of using the income to help the poor, the King used the money for his own benefit, harming the country. His carelessness with money caused France to fall into a deep debt, upsetting those who had to pay more taxes to repay it. The rebellion was justified because the government was ruining the countries economic state. In modern Tunisia, citizens are oppressed by the government. A street vendor was told he could no longer sell vegetables on the street, and as a form of rebellion he lit himself of fire, dying a few days later. (BBC News). His protest sparked protest in the eyes of other Tunisians and began in the Arab Spring. The government prohibited the street vendor from selling his vegetables, which hurt him and his customers. The government unfairly took his supplies and forced him to stop selling his product. When the government harms the well-being of the country and its citizens, it is justified to…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The French Revolution was an important movement in world history. It marked the first time that the lowest class in a country had overthrown the highest class. In France, the Third Estate had decided that they had had enough of unfair taxes and inequality, and so they wrote the Declaration of the Rights of Man and forced the king at the time, Louis XVI, to share power with the National Assembly. As the Revolution gained more power, its leaders became more paranoid. In 1793, Maximilien Robespierre, who had assumed most of the power in France, declared that a reign of terror would begin. During this period of time, the French government’s first priority was keeping the Revolution safe from people who wanted…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As Charles Dickens once said, “Liberty, equality, fraternity, or death; - the last, much the easiest to bestow, O Guillotine!” The French Revolution has been seen as a war that caused death, pain, and prosperity. Many primary documents, like Simon Schama Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution, have mentioned that the amount of human lives lost during the French Revolution was unnecessary. The amount of deaths in the revolution explains the outcome of how much violence took place. Was the French Revolution worth its human costs? The loss of so many lives in the French Revolution was not worth it. The deaths were of many people who were innocent, as they were not involved in the revolution. France became obsessed with violence, as this became their main focus. Concluding the revolution, the deaths did not benefit the outcome of France.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The French Revolution was a period of pure chaos shortly after the American Revolution. The French revolution started for multiple reasons. Under the rule of King Louis XIV, there was drought, overpopulation, bread wars, overspending, and immense debt from the American Revolution. The people suffering from all of these factors only wanted one thing: a republican form of government. King Louis failed to fulfill this request, and was taken out of power. When this occurs, the lack of power and control opens a window of time in which the citizens of Europe could fight for what they want. Thus causing the Reign of Terror. Mass amounts of death occurred, leaving every man to fight for themselves. The Reign of Terror was justified in sense that it…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reign Of Terror DBQ

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The French Revolution went into a chaotic bloodbath, and played a very big part in forming modern nation with the power of the people. It failed to achieve all of its goals in this bloody process. Once Louis XIV was killed, it lit the fuel to the fire of this terror that occurred. The Reign of Terror was not justified in many ways, because the internal threats were not harmful, the external threats were useless, and the extreme methods were used in a time of need and with unnecessary physical…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robespierre regarded himself as the General Will of France and believed that it was necessary to do anything to defend the Revolution and keep France “free” but he was wrong. The guillotine was not necessary nor justified to bring about the freedom of the republic. Robespierre was heavily influenced by Jean-Jacques Rousseau 's social contract theory which in its simplest state is the belief that the legitimacy of the state is created by the will or consent of its people who are the source of all political power. Robespierre did not follow through with these beliefs within his practice and grew to become a callus and overzealous leader that convicted even the innocent in the name of what he believed to be justice. A just leader cannot convict without proof that those convicted were guilty in the first place. While the overall outcome of the revolution was good and helped to abolish the strict monarchical government of France, the Reign of Terror in and of itself was not necessary to achieve these…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The French Revolution had many causes for its occurrence including, but not limited to, their leader, unfair treatment of the estates, and poor living conditions of the lower class. This led the people to revolt and made life even more chaotic for the residents of France. Their government, an absolute monarchy, gave King Louis XVI the right to do whatever he wanted for the “well-being” of France. As explained in Document 1, “He ruled by the divine right theory which held that he had received his power to govern from God and was therefore responsible to God alone.” This means that the king had complete control over the power and finance of France and often used it to only benefit himself. Another cause of the Revolution was because all of the…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the French revolution an estimated 40,000 people were gruesomely beheaded. Most of these deaths occurred during a time called the Reign of Terror. At the time, mostly due to economic troubles and income inequality, there was chaos and a call for the end of the monarchy whose corruption knew no bounds. Despite the apparent need for the revolution, there is no reason that such a horrid event like the Reign of Terror was justified. The Reign of Terror was not justified because it caused more foreign hostility, it involved an abysmal manner of determining who was executed or not and it caused damage within the country itself.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Absolutism led to unfit monarchs to take rule, enlightenment ideas to be spread and bias rights to be established. The revolution lasted from 1789-1799, during that time the National Assembly made most decisions, although Robespierre, a philosopher and lawyer took on the role as a leader. Later on, during 1793 Louis XVI was put on trial and was then found guilty, where he was sentenced to death while Marie Antoinette remained in prison. At the same time a Catholic and royal army rebelled and started to attack against the revolution leading into a civil war. Overtime more and more people were sentenced to death under Robespierre's rule and the rights of freedom and inequality ended once again. Leading up to what is known today as the Reign of Terror, where thousands of people lost their lives. The idea of an end to a continuous French Monarchy was monumental because it sets out for different systems of government to be established. It also was a direction to what we have today, freedom and equality amongst…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Reign of Terror was to help keep the French government a monarchy, but the people still revolted. The Reign of Terror was not justified because it was unnecessary, it was brutal, and it denied the French people’s natural rights. Thousands of innocent people died during the Reign of Terror. “We must smother…” The Reign of Terror was not…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Reign of Terror was a significant time in the French Revolution impacting the nation and killing many individuals. The Reign of Terror lasted less than two years. During that time, the Revolution was in extreme debt, due to wars. To solve the financial crisis, they created the Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen which ensured liberty, equality, and fraternity. However, Austria and Prussia were unhappy. They feared it increased the chance of a revolution. Led by chief prosecutor, Maximilien Robespierre, found that the king was guilty against the state. In 1793, he was guillotined. The execution lead to the Reign of Terror. 20,000 people were executed.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From 1789 to 1800 a time of revolution took place in France to end monarchy and finally give more power to the people. During the revolution, an era of revolts and many deaths, but also new ideas and extraordinary steps to a much needed government, the era of the Reign of Terror. The bloodiest time in the French Revolution, lead by many people such as Robespierre, an educated man that spoke on the behalf of the people and spread ideas and actions for a better government. This part in the French Revolution will eventually end with the person who started it, Maximilien Robespierre. Although the Reign of Terror had brutal violence, it was justified because of the resistance of the revolution in France, the foreign threats and to protect the public safety inside of France.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Reign of Terror was a crucial time during the French Revolution that negatively affected the lives of many. This horrifying period during the French Revolution all began in the year 1792 when former King Louis XVI was executed for treason. The following year, Maximilien Robespierre took control of France through the Committee of Public Safety. From that point on, the country of France went into a time of mourning and brought great suffering among millions. Was the Reign of Terror, a time of depression and tremendous agony, a reasonable act? In the eyes of many, it was not reasonable due to all the effects it brought among the country of France. Therefore it is clear that the Reign of Terror was not justified, because…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays