Why Is The Nuremberg Trials Important

Improved Essays
Nuremberg Trials The Nuremberg Trials were held by the four major Allies of World War II which included the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, the United States, and France. After the war was over, Joseph Stalin, the Soviet Leader, Franklin D Roosevelt, President of the U.S., and Winston Churchill, Prime Minister of Britain signed the Moscow Declaration which stated that the Axis power were to take responsibility for the war. In 1943 US Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson got the four nations together in London to discuss the war crimes committed during the Second World War by Nazi Germany. That is when the leader began discussing a punishment for their crimes. During the Yalta Conference in 1943, Joseph Stalin suggested that they execute …show more content…
There were seven principles to help define war crimes. One of the principles stated that any person who commits a crime under the international criminal law can be punished. Another principle stated that just because the internal law of a country does not punish for an international crime does not exempt the individual from international punishment. In the Nuremberg Trials, the war crimes in Germany committed by many Nazi officers were not crimes in their country at the time but they were still held responsible on an international level. One very important principle is that the orders of a superior officer are not an excuse to break international law. In the Nuremberg Trials many criminals tried to plea that they were only following the demands of their superiors so the judges had to decide whether or not that was an acceptable plea, which it turned out to be not acceptable. When a soldier states that they should not be guilty in court because they were following the orders of a superior officer it is called the Nuremberg defense, since many of the accused German defendants used that defense at Nuremberg. The Nuremberg defense cannot be a defense for any war crimes even today. The Nuremberg Principles also outlined the crimes that are punishable under international …show more content…
In the International Military Tribunal for the Far East (IMTFE) or the Tokyo Trials, the leaders of the Empire of Japan were tried by the United States for similar war crimes as the Nuremberg Trials after the end of World War II in 1946. The Tokyo Trials’ purpose was to prosecute Japanese officials from committing crimes against peace, specifically trying to wage war and crimes against humanity. The framework for both trials is very similar. This is why the Nuremberg Trials served as a model for the IMTFE. The Tokyo Trials showed how the Principles of the Nuremberg Trials could be used for other cases dealing with international crimes. The system of the Tokyo Trials was an improvement compared to the Nuremberg Trials because now it was known that justice could be served to anyone so all criminals could be charged. Each trial afterwards continues to improve from past experience. The Tokyo Trials were just the first steps for the influence of the Nuremberg

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The United Nations also set up a Human Rights Commission, which was set up to help prevent future atrocities. These trials showed that atrocities…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article, “Even Tojo had a trial” denotes the deterioration of the American justice system and how terrorism on American soil has clouded our perceptions of due process. Hellyer references one of the most hated dictator’s capture, trial and execution to compare to the degenerating of our justice system. December 7, 1945 has been labeled, “a date which will live in infamy” when Japan attacked the naval base at Pearl Harbor. Hideki Tojo, the prime minister of Japan during World War II, was captured on September 11, 1945 at his home after a failed attempt at suicide. With U.S. medical care and a transfusion from a U.S. soldier, Sgt.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prisoners In Ww1

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    But in most cases, camp commandants in World War One abided by the Hague convention and treated their prisoners as best they could in wartime…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These wartime laws were in place to promote the safety of soldiers during war, and to ensure that anyone captured would be cared for until the end of the war. During WWII though, it was common for these laws known as the Geneva Conventions to be broken by various countries involved in the war. Japan, Germany, and the Soviet Union were all violators of the Geneva Conventions during WWII, and their acts will forever be remembered…

    • 1027 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, the execution of Henry Wirz, for his maltreatment of Union Prisoners of War during the American Civil War. However, unlike that trial, the Nuremburg Trials contained a tribunal with judges from America, Russia, and Great Britain. Since each of these countries had their own legal practices, it made the trials much more complicated. After some time, the Allies eventually declared the laws and procedures for the trials on August 8, 1945 using the London Charter of the International Military Tribunal (IMT). The IMT included three categories: war crimes, crimes against peace, and crimes against humanity.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On February 4th of 1945, three men with vital roles in World War II met for the first time in two years. President of the United States Franklin D. Roosevelt, British Prime Minister Winston S. Churchill, and Soviet Premier Joseph Stalin, met in Yalta to discuss matters regarding their positions in the war. In accordance with the location, the meeting is historically known as the Yalta Conference. With their own agendas in mind, each man traveled to Yalta. Roosevelt hoped they would come to an agreement upon forming an organization called the United Nations, which held the purpose of increasing economic and political cooperation among its participating countries.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the Holocaust the Germans believed what they were doing by killing the Jews was right because they were led by Hitler to believe they were evil and needed to die. In the article the “Price of Obedience” by authors William Henry III, James O. Jackson, and Kanta Stanchina a guardsman was tired in 1989 for following “shoot to kill” orders when a man attempted to flee and escape West Germany. The authors state “in the eyes of Heinrich’s supervisors his actions were not merely legal but commendable”…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Roosevelt's Role In Ww2

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Big Three is a name that was given to the three major countries that attended the Yalta conference in 1945: the U.S, Russia, and Great Britain. These countries were represented by their leaders the U.S was represented by Franklin D. Roosevelt, Russia was represented by Joseph Stalin, and Winston Churchill represented Great Britain. Peace was restored and World War Two was brought to a successful end though the negotiations, disagreements, and compromises of these three men.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After World War II the United Nations created tribunals for criminal prosecution of war crimes proceeded with the Nuremberg Trials. Since that time there have been other systems including the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) that dealt with the war crimes that occurred in Yugoslavia. Also, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) which prosecuted those involved in the genocide in Rwanda (U.N., 2015). In addition, there are Hybrid Tribunals and the International Criminal Court (ICC). These tribunals and law courts are successful in prosecuting individuals involved in major crimes.…

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I think that it is important that we study the Holocaust because it was a huge part of history. Over 6 million people died in the Holocaust. The Holocaust impacted many lives, including Eliezer’s life. Many families were lost during this time. In the book, “Night” By Elie Wiesel, Eliezer was a part of the Holocaust and lost his family because of it.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Japanese Americans were not given a trial before being found guilty - just by being Japanese made them the culprits. Despite being wrongfully contained in concentration camps, most of the Japanese people complied with what they were being told. Many fought valiantly for the Allies during World War II - even as their families were being held in U.S. internment camps. The Constitution should have protected the Japanese American people from being forced into internment…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The judges were from the Allied powers and they oversaw twenty-two of the major criminals (Nuremberg). Over half of the Nazis were sentenced to death while most of the defendants actually admitted to the crimes they were accused of (Nuremberg). Some of the criminals said they were just following orders of a higher authority, but yet, they seemed not to even blink an eye when tormenting and killing the victims. It just seemed that when the criminals admitted to their crimes that that was the key in figuring out the Holocaust did occur. During the trials, eyewitnesses had reports of Nazi atrocities in Poland and brought them to the Allied governments…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The brutality of World War II was a very defining moment in humanity. Allied powers truly sought to bring about the end of the Axis Powers and Nazi Germany. If the Axis Powers were not defeated the world would truly be much different than it is today. As many concessions were made throughout the war, the agenda of the "Big Three" was to put pressure on Nazi Germany and assure that they country was defeated with the defeat of Japan also. The Yalta Conference would bring about drastic changes post the war that would bring about the establishment of the United…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Germans, both citizens and soldiers, fell into two categories: potential threats and neutralized combatants. In each decision the Allies made, there was a distinction between Allies and Nazis, between the “good guys” and “bad guys.” These distinctions allowed removed leaders to become callous to the murder of those they considered evil. In this respect, the Allies became “a willfully deaf and blind enemy” (193). Carnage committed on enemy soil appeared as clever and practical strategy, while domestic sorrow at the loss of their own soldiers was ever present.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Like little pieces to a puzzle, different aspects of World War Two connect to make a much larger picture. These pieces could be simply be a person or an event. Combined, they fit together in a way never imagined before, to prevail the entire story. Like laying down the first piece, the United State’s inevitable entrance into the second world war began with the attack on Pearl Harbor. Charles De Gaulle worked to save French troops and assist the British in defeating Germany during the war.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays