What Is The Immortal Life Of Henrietta Lacks

Improved Essays
The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot displays the controversy as to whether or not the public has a responsibility to support scientific progress at all costs. This controversy became evident after Henrietta Lacks’ cervical tissues were taken from her body without her consent and then her cells, which became immortal, were used for medical research everywhere and her family did not know about it. These cells have helped the medical field in many ways, including creating a vaccine for the polio virus. Yet these cells were still taken without Henrietta’s consent, and her family suffered greatly as the cost. The public does not have a responsibility to be forced to support scientific progress …show more content…
Lori Andrews argues that personal freedom is more important than science and people should be able to make their own conscious choice as to whether or not their tissue is used. Some may believe that had Henrietta been asked for consent, she would not have allowed her cells to be taken and then all the scientific breakthroughs that came about because of her cells would not have happened, this cannot be determined. Given her low education, it was likely she would in fact give consent as most people did whatever their doctors asked of them. While Henrietta was a poor black woman who did not hold much trust for doctors, she knew she was dying and if given knowledge as to what her cells were going to be tested for, she may have still decided to let the doctors use …show more content…
People deserve to know what part of their body is being used for. If it is being used in the right way, scientific progress will still be advanced and it will be advanced in an ethical way. Because informed consent, human rights and the right to their own property is law, no person has any obligation to science. No person should have to go through the pain that the Lacks family did of being left in the dark to their mothers great help to modern science. Each person has a right to autonomy, therefore they do not have a responsibility to support scientific progress, but hopefully, with informed consent, science can still

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Informed Consent Principal was diminished because the gynecologist, Dr. Howard Jones, removed cancer cells from Henrietta Lacks and sent them to another doctor, Dr. Gey, to conduct research without her or her family’s consent to do so before hand. Although it is illegal now, there was no ethical laws preventing doctors from removing tissue from a live patient; however, there were laws against removing tissue and cells from a deceased patient. Mary Kubicek removed tumor tissue from Henrietta at the request of Dr. Gey and the family had only given consent to perform an autopsy, not removal of the tissue. (The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, by Rebecca Skloot). After receiving the cells from Dr. Jones, Dr. Gey named Henrietta’s cells “HeLa” in order to conceal the identity of the cells from her family as well as from the world, and claimed to receive the cells from a “Helen Lane”.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although she signed the consent form, I don’t believe Henrietta, or her family knew about what the doctors would do to her. She was treated as a science experience in my opinion. Her cells were only useful for research, while they neglected treated her. Given the information, I know about patient informed consent, I don’t believe Henrietta would’ve signed the consent form if she had all knowledge of what she was signing. One aspect to consider is the beneficence factor.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Henrietta wasn’t given this right (to choose her treatment/informed consent), but might have been willing in spirit. As I said, while ethics and laws should be considered together, in The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks they were not. Informed consent was not a requirement at the time, but it should be viewed as unethical. She certainly did not want those cancer cells in her body and -had she been asked- probably would not have been against allowing the doctors using them for research (especially because of racial dynamics). In terms of the spirit of autonomy, I think had Henrietta’s family been compensated, especially considering all of the lives saved and improved because of HeLa cells, that the family would have consented in her place.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Her immortal cells will always continue to live on, but only after Henrietta and her family faced many obstacles. Henrietta lived her life being exploited by researchers. Her or her family never got any recognition or compensation for Henrietta 's role and contribution to Science via the HeLa cell line. Doctors also abused their power and acted inhumanely when caring for her and trying to treat her cancer by taking the cells in the first place. Not much of anything that was done to Henrietta Lacks by doctors and researchers could be justified.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The family, due to their lack of knowledge about human cells still thought Henrietta was alive. While scientists were making profits off of Henrietta’s cells, the Lack’s family could barely afford a doctor’s visit. The family was clueless of the money that was being made off of their mother. Skloot and Deborah begin to investigate Henrietta’s life as well as Elsie’s, to uncover the real truth that was hidden for years. Eventually they go to Crownsville and learn about how Elsie was abused and left to die alone.…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Where the response of the public health field was not adequate was at the individual level. Tests were done with HeLa cells that put individuals at risk. Also, the public health response failed at the individual level because Henrietta 's rights were never considered. Doctors took a piece of her own body to research without her permission. Even after the cell proved to be able to survive in a lab, Henrietta still had no idea.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The center for Disease Control and Prevention says, “The men were never given adequate treatment for their disease. Even when penicillin became the drug of choice for syphilis in 1947, researchers did not offer it to the subjects. The advisory panel found nothing to show that subjects were ever given the choice of quitting the study, even when this new, highly effective treatment became widely used” (CDC). In my opinion, this should never be the case because every patient in a medical study should be informed on what they are participating in and should never be misled. Clinical trials however, are a necessary evil.…

    • 1995 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Henrietta was such a caring and devoted mother that no one other that her sisters and husband even knew that she was sick, “Until that point, no one except Sadie, Margaret, and Day knew Henrietta was sick,” (65). Henrietta just wanted to take care of her children and live her life; sadly, that was cut short because of her cancer. The scientific community, like Henrietta, withheld many secrets from Henrietta’s family. The major one being that they were in possession of immortal cells that were extracted from Henrietta. The book says, “One of Gey’s colleagues told me that Gey created the pseudonym to throw journalists off the trail of Henrietta’s real identity...and because of that, her family had no idea her cells were alive,” (109).…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most notable instance was the removal of patient’s cells without their knowledge or permission. When Henrietta died, the doctors still did not reveal to her husband that they had been using her cells. The doctors, in fact, actually coerced Day into allowing Henrietta to undergo an autopsy without giving him the full details of why they wanted to perform the…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people even tried to fight back against the legalization of abortion, by sending many Human Life amendments sent to congress to attempt illegalizing abortion once again. But none of the of the proposed amendments were passed (34). This affected so many people personally on how they felt about the issue. The bill called Right to Consequence was therefore passed to protect Doctors and Nurses from being forced to perform abortions (34). You would ask why a Doctor or nurse would not like to perform an abortion, most of the times it was against their religious beliefs.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays