Why Is The Hammurabi Code Unfair

Improved Essays
The Hammurabi code was a very questionable code of laws which most people (at least the sane ones) deem unfair. The reasons for why it’s unfair vastly outweigh the reasons for why it is fair. It’s unfair because rich men are treated better than everyone else, slavery was pretty bad, and the lower classes were treated awfully as well. There are many examples of these subjects which are pretty unfair in the eyes of the modern man, and also the people back then I'm sure. The first subject that will be mentioned is the relationship between men and women in this society. As stated previously, men were treated way better than everyone else including women. Firstly, husbands could divorce whenever they wanted to, but the wife could only divorce under certain circumstances; like if the husband randomly leaves for no reason. Another, more brutal, reason is the unfairness of affairs. So, I think everyone can agree than affairs are pretty dang …show more content…
So it’s pretty obvious that slaves were treated poorly, because they were slaves of course. So if a slave was to somehow escape, and a kind person hid them in their house for safety, they would both be killed if caught. I’m not sure why they’d want to find the slave just to kill him but whatever. A second example could be murder. If a freeman killed another freeman, the killer would be killed as well. However, if a freeman killed a slave, the killer would only have to pay the amount the slave costed to the slave owner. That obviously proves slaves weren't treated as equals (I mean they're slaves so what'd you expect). Now, there’s one more example that’s worth listing. So, if a doctor was to accidentally kill a freeman, he'd have his hands cut of. That’s already unfair since it was an accident, but brace yourself it gets worse. If a slave was to be accidentally killed, or even purposely, the slave would just be replaced. Now that’s what I call

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Hammurabi Dbq Analysis

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hammurabi was a king and wrote a code which included 282 Laws which was not fair and ruled Mesopotamia 4,000 years ago. Hammurabi's Code was not just because it hurt the family, in negatively affected personal property, and was not fair against personal injury. To begin, Hammurabi's code hurt the family. For example, In Document C it says that if a woman who married and is caught adultery they shall bind them in the water.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hammurabi DBQ

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hammurabi Hammurabi created one of the first code of laws dating back about 40 centuries ago! Hammurabi got the laws from Shamash (the god of justice). He wrote 282 laws on one big stone stele. He was the ruler of the kingdom of Babylonia which had about 1,000,000 people in it (BGE). Was Hammurabi’s code just?…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hammurabi Code Dbq

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hammurabi's code was put in ruling in 1750B.C.E. He ruled in Ancient babylonia know now as Irack. His code of laws was a very harsh and unforgiving code of laws. It was the worst to women thought. Sometimes the punishment was worst than the crime itself. Hameribes cobe was a very unfair law.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Together these laws state that if a man has knocked out the eye of a free man his eye shall be knocked out but if a man knocks out the eye of a slave he shall pay half his value (Doc E). Everyone is equal, slave or not slave. This law is also very unfair because a man can’t choose if he is born into a slave family or what color he is. If a man knows that he will only have to pay half a slaves value he could knock out a slaves eye whenever he wanted to, how was that fair to the…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These individuals were seen as property and were treated as much by their owners and in some cases the government. When a slave ran away they would either be returned to their owner or they could be killed as an example. There were cases of a female slave killing her owner's’ family and when caught was executed for the crime, but the state paid the owner of the women six hundred dollars for depriving him of his property. A number of the executions that were done by slave owners never went through the courts and was considered legal to perform. Those slaves who committed a crime and were caught and sentenced to death often saw some of the largest crowds gather to witness the executions.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hammurabi Dbq Analysis

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Law 196 ¨If a man has knocked out the eye of a free man,his eye shall be knocked out. In Law 199 ¨If he has knocked out the eye of a slave... he shall pay half his value.¨(Doc E) These laws are just because a free man is worth more and lives in the upper class. The slave is worth less but at least he is getting payed half of his value.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hammurabi DBQ

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hammurabi was a king in Mesopotamia with laws that he created that you didn’t want to break. All together Hammurabi had 282 laws in total and if you broke them the punishments were harsh . Hammurabi got his laws from the god of justice-Shamash and were wrote on a stele with their writing called “Cuneiform” (BGE Doc A). Hammurabi’s Code: Was It Just? Hammurabi’s code was not just because of its family law, property law and personal injury law that he created with the god of justice.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Did you know that there are seven major sections of Hammurabi’s Code? They are, in order, the prologue, the legal procedures, household laws, slavery, trade and business, religion, and epilogue. It’s one of the oldest sets of laws. King Hammurabi made this organized set of laws. Hammurabi’s Code was a very important set of laws.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Envision how you would feel if you were attacked for speaking against your father. Imagine what it would feel like to lose your mother for that same reason. Hammurabi’s code was a set of laws made to deal with everything from marital problems to property issues. Hammurabi’s code is not just because of his use of religion as an excuse, harsh punishments, and unequal treatment.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hammurabi Dbq Analysis

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages

    First, in Law 28, “If a man has broken through the wall [to rob] a house, they shall be put him to death and pierce him, or hang him in the hole in the wall which he had made,” (Doc D). As, in Law 48, “If a man borrowed money to plant his fields and a storm has flooded his field or carried away the crop,... in the year he does not have to pay his creditor,” (Doc D). Truly, these examples show that Hammurabi’s Code was unjust because In Law 28, If you break into a house, in order to rob, you will be put to death.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hammurabi’s code of laws were seen differently thousands of years ago, opposed to how we see them today. Speaking in an 18th century BCE state of mind, I would say that the laws he established were just. I believe this because in the epilogue, Hammurabi says that as king it is his responsibility to protect his subjects and in my eyes, he does that by enforcing these laws, which makes them just. One of my reasons for believing that his laws were just can be found in Document C which pertains to the laws focused on family. Specifically, Law 168 in which it states that “If a man has determined to disinherit his son and has declared before the judge, ‘I cut off my son,’ the judge shall inquire into the son’s past, and, if the son has not committed a grave misdemeanor…, the father shall not disinherit his son.”…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hammurabi Dbq Analysis

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In law 209 and 213, “if a man strikes a daughter of a free man and causes her to lose the fruit of her womb, he shall pay 10 shekels of silver.” “If man has struck the slave-girl of a free man and causes her to lose the fruit of the womb, he shall pay 2 shekels of silver.” (Doc E). Again, you can see that this isn’t fair. They are both humans.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery Dbq

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Slaveholders denied Africans their basic human rights because they wanted free labor. Slaves were important for the southerners, they believed that the fastest way to run their plantations was free labor. In document 1, we find out that Slaves were denied their basic human rights. This statement is true and will be proven in this paragraphs.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Mckenna Robbins Coach Smith Ancient World History 25 September 2017 Hammurabi’s Code: Was it Just? Hit you your father, You will be left with no hands. King Hammurabi ruled for 42 years. He became king of babylon. He created 292 laws…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I can see why some people say that Hammurabi’s code is unjust because of how harsh they were. An example of how harsh they are, if a woman is caught in the act of adultery, she shall be bound and thrown into the river. To me this law is the harshest of all the laws because it seems like a way to torture someone. As you can see from the evidence that Hammurabi’s code has harsh laws that are a little over the top.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays