Why Is The Fifth Amendment Important

Improved Essays
The Fifth Amendment protects against unfair treatment in the legal processes, and from the government abusing their power. The fifth amendment states "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."(Bill of …show more content…
The Fifth Amendment was written to protect the rights of individuals against tyrannical government. When a citizen went to court said person would have to answer any and every question thrown at them. The court wouldn’t even have to tell the prosecuted what the charge(s) where and what evidence was collected. So the ‘guilty’ citizen would think they wouldn’t need a lawyer and could end up self-incriminating themselves. The government could also torture one and one could be automatically guilty if they had remanded silent. On December 15th, 1791 the amendment was put into the bill of rights, with the Fifth Amendment the government couldn’t force citizens to testify against themselves. It also played a big part in the Supreme Court case Miranda vs. Arizona in 1966. The police have to read the citizen there Miranda rights, if they don’t any confession you give the officer can’t be used against …show more content…
In the 1900’s several things where changed, one being curfew regulations do not violate the law. The changes occurred in 1943 stating, boundaries would be set and a curfew would be put In place that citizens had to abide by. The court ruled that this was not a violation to the amendment. Another change being organizations do not have the right to self-incriminate, forcing withhold of any papers or records if your business is under investigation as illegal. The Fifth Amendment was made to protect individuals or citizens, it was not made to protect organizations or businesses. Also, the government can take private property. The government didn’t want to get rid of emanate domain, therefore they put this into what’s now referred to as the Fifth Amendment. The reasoning for this was that they needed to be able to fulfil their duties to the people and that their goal is more important than the inconvenience of the people. Also, Prior notice and a hearing are required before the government can take your land. Due process requires a hearing before one is deported. This gives time and notice to anyone who is under investigation by the Immigration agents. The government says if they do not hold a trial it’s depriving them of liberty. A huge one, a citizen has the right to remain silent. Stating one does not have to answer any of the questions they ask you, but if one decides to answer their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This case mainly references the Fifth Amendment, the right against self-incrimination. In the case, Malloy, a petitioner, was sentenced to one year in jail for unlawful gambling. After 3 months, however, he was released from jail and put on probation for 2 years. While malloy was on probation, he was asked to testify to a state inquiry into gambling and other criminal-related activities that Malloy was involved in. When he heard this, he declined to testify and answer their questions because it would have incriminated…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Garrity vs. New Jersey Case Study Critique One Tracey Green CJUS 530 Liberty University ABSTRACT The Fifth Amendment establishes various rights within the criminal and civil courts. When it comes to criminal cases the Fifth Amendment guarantees the right to a grand jury and prevents double jeopardy and it also protects against self-incrimination. Also, it implements due process to be a part of any legal proceedings that would deny a citizen life, liberty or property and requires the government to compensate a citizen when private property is taken for public use.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Salinas Vs Texas Summary

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2) A witness may not use the Fifth Amendment to avoid giving testimony he does not want to give. 3) Invoking the Fifth Amendment makes known to the Government that a witness intends on using this right. Holding – The state court, Court of Appeals, and Court of Criminal Appeals were not in error because a witness does not invoke rights by merely remaining silent and petitioner was required to declare the right in order to protect his interests. Rationale – The court deduced that invoking the Fifth Amendment requires the proper action on the part of the person choosing to use it and proper channels exist to make these indications known for those choosing to invoke such rights.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fifth Amendment says that no one can be accused of a crime unless a grand jury decides that there is enough evidence to charge a person for a crime in court. The defendant has a choice to testify or not to testify. If they choose to testify, the defendant loses his Fifth Amendment privilege and must answer the questions asked. However, at the trial the defendant who has been called to the witness stand by the grand jury can refuse to answer certain…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fifth Amendment grants us right to a grand jury, right of protection against double jeopardy, right against self-incrimination, and right to due process. The Sixth Amendment grants us right of criminal defendants, right to a public trial, right to a lawyer, right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who the accuser is and the charges and evidence against them “and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.” During the Salem witch trials there was no defense given to the accuser, but now they have the right to defend themselves. “nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property.” back then there was self-incriminating questions that they had to answer, but now there is an option given to self-incriminate or not. Those who were accused of witchcraft were walking into a trial where the decision was already made before a word was even said, but now the decision must be completely free of bias when made.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The right to remain silent is located in Fifth Amendment, and the right to have a presence of attorney is located in the Sixth Amendment of the constitution. The Supreme Court ended up ruling that it was unconstitutional to undertake the interrogation without the warning of the rights secured by the Fifth Amendment. Additionally, the court stated that they must protect the individual from the desire to self-incriminate ("Miranda v."). The court created the Miranda Warning which is as follows: "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fifth amendment is part of the bill of rights in which each amendment specifies not only our rights but our protections against the government when needed. It is stated within the amendment that “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury…”. Similarly, it is also divided into three separate clauses that enhance the major phases when dealing in a criminal investigation and prosecutions. The first one is the grand jury, secondly right to self-incrimination, and finally double jeopardy. The way it came to be in this order was due to not only history, but by also the clarification Alfredo Garcia initiated.…

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, the Miranda rights are provided under the 5th amendment, which further ensure proper due process and protects a person’s right to liberty. Due process in the 5th amendment happens through court proceedings and protects someone suspected of a crime. With the 14th amendment, due process is a given right to limit the governments interference with, and control over, personal affairs of the…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One quote is “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime was committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witness against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense (Bill of Rights).” This is the sixth amendment exactly. It gives the people multiple rights. The sixth amendment to the Bill of Rights is the most needed because it grants the right to a speedy trial by jury, to have no one subject to the same offense twice, and to have the assistance of the council for his defense (What the Sixth…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The investigators found a written confession admitting the offense. However, the police officers who arrested Miranda did not advise him to have an attorney during the interrogation. Even though the court charged Miranda for the crimes, the appeal in the Supreme Court of Arizona found no violation of his constitutional rights since he failed to request counsel. The amendment in check was the Fifth Amendment. D. 419 U.S. 565 Goss v. Lopez Argued: October 16, 1974 Decided: January 22,…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The sixth amendment, which is the right to counsel is used to ensure fairness across the board. A right to counsel is needed to avoid unjust convictions as well as to protect the individual’s rights. Every defendant is entitled to counsel. Counsel is automatically provided to those who are facing the death penalty, are illiterate, or don’t have enough money to pay for one themselves. The sixth amendment guarantees the right to waive assistance of counsel and conduct one's own defense.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Worrall, 2012). Someone that have already been charged may have the right to counsel before a grand jury proceedings but the fifth Amendment can off set the protection and refuse to…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (Neubauer & Fradella, 2015) The four amendments of the Bill of Right that deal with criminal procedure protect citizens. The Fourth Amendment states that the law enforcement cannot arrest a citizen or search his or her property unless there is probable cause. The Fifth Amendment…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Courts in Criminal Justice This paper will explain the doctrine of incorporation states that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment applies to the protections of the Bill of Rights to the states. Explaining that incorporation can be selective, and includes those rights deemed as fundamental, such as those protected by the First Amendment. Rights & Protections for the Accused…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Powell V. Alabama Case

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments were established to protect the rights of the suspected, the accused, criminal defendants and that of convicted criminals. There have been several instances of the course time where these protections of rights haven’t been upheld. An example of when these protections of rights have been neglected is the Powell v. Alabama in 1932. There are several things that made this particular case so different from that of other cases. The time period, the series of events in the case, and the doctrines that were established during this time period are just a few to mention.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays